电子商务交易风险的概率统计模型与防范策略
Probability and Statistical Models of E-Commerce Transaction Risks and Prevention Strategies
摘要: 电子商务交易风险涉及支付、信用与物流多个环节,传统基于经验规则的管控手段在常态与高峰场景间难以兼顾灵敏度与稳健性。本模型主要针对非促销常态期的交易风险建模,对于“双十一”等高峰场景,提出了一套基于场景切换的扩展框架。以某电商平台2023年公开披露的100万笔交易为样本,构建了基于泊松分布、正态分布与Copula函数的联合概率风险模型,并提出动态预警与分级管控策略。描述性统计显示,支付风险月度频数均值为12,方差为12.8,接近泊松分布假设;信用损失偏度为0.35,峰度为3.1,基本符合正态分布特征。拟合优度检验进一步实证结果表明,泊松分布和正态分布可作为描述常态下支付风险频数与信用损失中心区间的有效近似。引入Copula进行依赖性诊断后,确定使用t-Copula刻画三类风险的对称尾部相依结构。策略实施后,支付风险强度由12次/月降至8次/月,信用平均单笔损失由500元降至350元,物流风险结构占比由4.0%降至2.5%。研究表明,基于概率统计模型的风险防范策略能够有效压降到达强度、损失规模与结构暴露。
Abstract: E-commerce transaction risks involve multiple links including payment, credit and logistics. Traditional control methods based on empirical rules struggle to balance sensitivity and robustness between normal business scenarios and peak business scenarios. This model mainly constructs transaction risk modeling for the non-promotion normal period. For peak scenarios such as Double 11 Shopping Festival, an extended framework based on scenario switching is proposed. Taking 1 million publicly disclosed transactions of an e-commerce platform in 2023 as samples, this paper constructs a joint probability risk model based on the Poisson distribution, normal distribution and Copula function, and puts forward dynamic early warning and hierarchical control strategies. Descriptive statistics show that the monthly frequency mean of payment risks is 12 with a variance of 12.8, which is close to the assumption of Poisson distribution; the skewness of credit loss is 0.35 and the kurtosis is 3.1, basically conforming to the characteristics of normal distribution. Further empirical results of goodness-of-fit test verify that the Poisson distribution and normal distribution can serve as effective approximations to describe the monthly frequency of payment risks and the central interval of credit losses under normal conditions. After introducing the Copula function for dependency diagnosis, the t-Copula is adopted to characterize the symmetric tail dependence structure of the three types of risks. After the implementation of the strategy, the intensity of payment risks decreased from 12 times per month to 8 times per month, the average single credit loss dropped from 500 yuan to 350 yuan, and the proportion of logistics risk structure fell from 4.0% to 2.5%. The research indicates that the risk prevention strategy based on probabilistic statistical models can effectively reduce risk occurrence intensity, loss scale and structural exposure.
参考文献
|
[1]
|
陈金燕. 电子商务交易模式重构商业形态会计核算如何应对新挑战[J]. 中国商界, 2025(13): 192-193.
|
|
[2]
|
关卫棉. 大数据背景下互联网金融风险防范路径[J]. 金融文坛, 2025(7): 13-15.
|
|
[3]
|
侯佳音. 审计视角下跨境电商企业风险与控制——以“亚马逊”企业为例[J]. 中国储运, 2025(7): 102-103.
|
|
[4]
|
王江涛, 蔡雅, 郑承利. 一类自适应的风险预测算法及其应用[J]. 中国管理科学, 2023, 31(8): 1-8.
|
|
[5]
|
杨文俊, 谢力, 卢毅, 毛维平, 王敦宇. 基于数据驱动Apriori-RMM的装备采购合同履行风险评估[J]. 兵工自动化, 2025, 44(3): 61-65+72.
|
|
[6]
|
何建民, 王晨溪. 物流企业货运风险评估与成本控制研究——基于货运作业模式风险博弈抉择的成本事前测算方法分析[J]. 价格理论与实践, 2024(10): 99-105.
|
|
[7]
|
马潇宇, 贺舟, 林超华. 基于主体建模仿真的供应链风险管理研究: 现状、问题与展望[J]. 管理评论, 2026, 38(5): 238-250.
|
|
[8]
|
焦淑芳. 电子商务企业会计实务处理中的税务合规性研究[J]. 中国科技投资, 2025(19): 52-54.
|
|
[9]
|
王健禹. 基于随机控制的最优配对交易策略问题[J]. 天府数学, 2025(3): 13-16.
|
|
[10]
|
秦星红, 蒋雯, 胡森森, 李贵萍, 曹园园. 考虑制造商质量风险规避的网购供应链延保定价与商业保险联合策略研究[J]. 系统工程理论与实践, 2026, 46(2): 723-737.
|
|
[11]
|
王彦凯, 彭幸春. 带交易成本的时间一致风险控制与投资策略[J]. 数学物理学报, 2024, 44(5): 1400-1414.
|
|
[12]
|
陈华, 石钊颖. 网络风险及保险研究: 文献综述与研究展望[J]. 武汉金融, 2022(5): 66-74.
|
|
[13]
|
杨健. 农村电商供应链风险及法律规制研究[J]. 法制博览, 2025(19): 109-111.
|
|
[14]
|
黄凯熙. 信息化背景下光电企业内部审计的风险识别与应对策略[J]. 财会通讯, 2024(21): 116-120.
|
|
[15]
|
苏婉, 于森. 基于随机微分博弈的企业数据交易合作策略研究[J]. 现代情报, 2025, 45(11): 116-129.
|
|
[16]
|
陈宏微. 创业投资项目风险评估模型及应用研究[J]. 数字经济, 2025(Z1): 93-95.
|