新就业形态下支配性劳动管理标准研究
Research on the Standard of Dominant Labor Management under the New Forms of Employment
摘要: 平台经济催生的新就业形态改变了传统用工模式,以人格、经济、组织三重从属性为核心的传统劳动关系认定标准逐渐显现适用局限,面对算法柔性管控、连环外包、诱导注册个体工商户等用工规避行为易产生裁判分歧。本文梳理我国劳动关系认定标准的历史演变,剖析传统标准在新业态下面临的多重困境。以最高人民法院第42批新就业形态劳动争议指导性案例与2025年网约货运典型案例为样本,系统阐释支配性劳动管理标准的裁判逻辑与适用规则。
Abstract: New forms of employment fostered by the platform economy have transformed traditional employment models. The traditional criteria for identifying labor relations, centered on the triple subordination of personality, economy and organization, have shown growing applicable limitations, and judicial divergences tend to occur in the face of labor evasion practices such as flexible algorithmic control, successive subcontracting, and inducing workers to register as individual industrial and commercial households. This paper sorts out the historical evolution of labor relation identification criteria in China and analyzes the multiple dilemmas of the traditional criteria when applied to new forms of employment. Taking the 42nd batch of guiding cases on labor disputes arising from new forms of employment issued by the Supreme People’s Court and a typical online freight case released in 2025 as research samples, it systematically expounds the judicial logic and applicable rules of the standard of dominant labor management.
文章引用:宋硕. 新就业形态下支配性劳动管理标准研究[J]. 争议解决, 2026, 12(9): 42-50. https://doi.org/10.12677/ds.2026.129253

参考文献

[1] 陆敬波, 周铁军, 王琪. 新就业形态下劳动关系认定标准及其实务研究[J]. 中国律师, 2026(5): 66-68.
[2] 田思路, 李帛霖. 雇主算法权力: 法理构造、内涵特征与规制路径[J]. 社会科学, 2023(1): 169-180.
[3] 肖竹. 劳动关系从属性认定标准的理论解释与体系构成[J]. 法学, 2021(2): 160-176.
[4] 谢增毅. 互联网平台用工劳动关系认定[J]. 中外法学, 2018, 30(6): 1546-1569.
[5] 王全兴, 刘琦. 我国新经济下灵活用工的特点、挑战和法律规制[J]. 法学评论, 2019, 37(4): 79-94.
[6] 王天玉. 互联网平台用工的合同定性及法律适用[J]. 法学, 2019(10): 165-181.
[7] 刘腾. 互联网平台经济背景下新就业形态劳动关系认定标准研究——基于对最高人民法院第42批指导性案例的分析[J]. 滁州职业技术学院学报, 2025, 24(3): 57-61.
[8] 王天玉. 劳动关系认定标准的法理[J]. 中国应用法学, 2025(2): 40-50.