公共产品理论视角下家庭教育的产品属性分析
Analysis of the Product Attributes of Family Education
摘要: 在家庭教育日益受到各界重视的背景下,关注点从分析学校和社会等公共场域的教育产品属性,开始转向分析家庭私人场域的教育产品属性。研究发现,家庭教育产品属性既包含直接产品属性和间接产品属性,也包括私人产品属性和公共产品属性,具有准公共产品属性。直接产品主要体现为家庭的原生环境,涵盖家庭氛围、教育方式,以及所能提供的各类教育资源。而间接产品则主要表现为,经良好家庭教育熏陶后,孩子身上所积累形成的人力资本,每个孩子在自身实现提升的同时,也会促使全社会的效用得到增进。基于公共产品理论来剖析,家庭教育的产品属性可被归类于准公共产品属性范畴。其中,家庭教育的直接产品,其属性更趋近于私人产品;而间接产品属性,则更偏向于公共产品。家庭教育作为教育的起点,是教育生态系统不可或缺的一环,为学校教育与社会教育筑牢了根基。
Abstract: Against the backdrop of growing attention to family education from all sectors, the focus has shifted from analyzing the educational product attributes in public domains such as schools and society to analyzing those in the private domain of the family. Research indicates that the product attributes of family education encompass both direct and indirect product attributes, as well as private and public product attributes, characterizing it as a quasi-public good. Direct products are primarily reflected in the original family environment, encompassing the family atmosphere, educational methods, and the various educational resources it can provide. Indirect products, on the other hand, are mainly manifested in the human capital accumulated and formed in children through exposure to sound family education. While each child achieves self-improvement, this also contributes to the enhancement of overall social utility. Based on public goods theory, the product attributes of family education can be categorized as quasi-public goods. Among these, the direct products of family education lean more towards private goods, whereas the indirect product attributes tend towards public goods. As the starting point of education, family education is an indispensable part of the educational ecosystem, laying a solid foundation for school education and social education.
参考文献
|
[1]
|
缪志心. 新时代家庭教育的权利来源、问题症结与法治化进路[J]. 教育理论与实践, 2025, 45(5): 21-25.
|
|
[2]
|
曹夕多. 论公共产品理论视野下的教师教育产品属性及政府责任[J]. 教师教育研究, 2013, 25(6): 6-12.
|
|
[3]
|
江娟, 肖昊. 对高等教育产品属性的再认识[J]. 贵阳学院学报(社会科学版), 2017, 12(3): 81-83.
|
|
[4]
|
陈晓宇. 论教育的产品属性与营利性学校[J]. 清华大学教育研究, 2012, 33(1): 109-116.
|
|
[5]
|
周金玲. 论教育产品及其经济属性[J]. 学术月刊, 2007(8): 84-88.
|
|
[6]
|
付双双. 家庭社会经济地位对初中生学业成绩的影响: 父母教育期望与亲子关系的中介作用[J]. 教育测量与评价, 2024(6): 97-109.
|
|
[7]
|
王树涛, 李彦. 社会资本影响教育获得的四种范式[J]. 教育与经济, 2024, 40(4): 3-13.
|
|
[8]
|
傅维利. 家庭教育资本的本质属性及投资风险管控[J]. 教育学报, 2021, 17(6): 134-145.
|
|
[9]
|
宋官东, 韩雪. 教育及其产品属性的新阐释[J]. 东北大学学报(社会科学版), 2013, 15(4): 418-423.
|
|
[10]
|
孙长远, 庞学光. 论职业教育的产品属性及其产品属性的可赋予性[J]. 江苏高教, 2016(6): 151-154.
|
|
[11]
|
黄秋萍. 自由市场的伦理限度: 基于“有益品”的反思[J]. 当代中国价值观研究, 2024, 9(1): 15-23.
|
|
[12]
|
马生松, 辛治洋. 家校社协同视域下学校开展家庭教育指导: 必要、可行与限度[J]. 当代教育论坛, 2025(1): 47-54.
|
|
[13]
|
武海英, 赵蕾蕾. 新时期家庭教育的内涵、现状与对策[J]. 河北师范大学学报(教育科学版), 2022, 24(3): 133-140.
|