基于范式的经济学教学模式构建与探索
Research on the Impact of Paradigm-Based Teaching Methods on Students’ Learning Outcomes
DOI: 10.12677/ae.2026.1691948, PDF,    科研立项经费支持
作者: 徐小芳, 刘 强:江苏海洋大学商学院,江苏 连云港
关键词: 范式教学经济学教育理论比较问题迁移Paradigm Teaching Economics Education Theoretical Comparison Problem Transfer
摘要: 本文以政治经济学课程为实践场域,探究基于范式的经济学教学模式与实践路径。不同于以知识传授、单一理论讲解为主的传统教学,本文以经典问题为组织线索,通过多范式呈现、结构化比较和问题迁移,将不同理论置于同一问题框架内,引导学生理解理论分歧及原因。本文通过“价值从何而来”的教学案例,具体展示了范式教学过程中的理论组织方式、比较维度与迁移过程。在此基础上,本文比较了范式教学与PBL、案例教学等教学方式,分析其比较优势以及局限性。本研究可以为推动经济学教育从知识传授向高阶思维能力培养转型提供可实践途径。
Abstract: This paper takes a political economy course as its practical setting and explores the construction and implementation of a paradigm-based economics teaching model. Unlike traditional teaching, which primarily focuses on knowledge transmission and the explanation of a single theoretical framework, this study uses classical questions as the organizing thread. It employs multi-paradigm presentation, structured comparison, and problem transfer to place different theories within a common problem framework and guide students to understand theoretical differences and their underlying causes. Using the teaching case of “Where Does Value Come From?”, the paper specifically demonstrates how theoretical knowledge is organized, compared, and transferred within the paradigm-based teaching process. It then compares paradigm-based teaching with other approaches, such as Problem-Based Learning (PBL) and case-based teaching, and discusses its comparative advantages and limitations. This study provides a practical approach for promoting the transformation of economics education from knowledge transmission toward the cultivation of higher-order thinking skills.
文章引用:徐小芳, 刘强. 基于范式的经济学教学模式构建与探索[J]. 教育进展, 2026, 16(9): 674-680. https://doi.org/10.12677/ae.2026.1691948

参考文献

[1] 刘兴旺, 陈胜辉. 数字技术赋能“政治经济学”课程教学模式创新探析[J]. 湖北开放职业学院学报, 2026, 39(3): 8-11.
[2] Becker, W.E. and Watts, M. (1996) Chalk and Talk: A National Survey on Teaching Undergraduate Economics. The American Economic Review, 86, 448-453.
[3] Becker, W.E. and Watts, M. (2001) Teaching Economics at the Start of the 21st Century: Still Chalk and Talk. American Economic Review, 91, 446-451.
https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.91.2.446
[4] 万莹, 刘雅楠. 基于翻转课堂的新文科人才培养模式创新研究——以税收经济学为例[J]. 昭通学院学报, 2023, 45(4): 99-106.
[5] Arık, S. and Yılmaz, M. (2020) The Effect of Constructivist Learning Approach and Active Learning on Environmental Education: A Meta-Analysis Study. International Electronic Journal of Environmental Education, 10, 44-84.
[6] 张丞, 刘硕. PBL + 案例教学法在统计学课程中的应用[J]. 现代商贸工业, 2022, 43(24): 189-191.
[7] Mearman, A., Wakeley, T., Shoib, G. and Webber, D.J. (2011) Does Pluralism in Economics Education Make Better Educated, Happier Students? A Qualitative Analysis. International Review of Economics Education, 10, 50-62.
[8] Ciccotosto, M., Sokolenko, O. and Proctor, J.C. (2024) Teaching the Polycrisis: Assessing the Effect of Pluralist Education in Italian Economics Programs. Review of Evolutionary Political Economy, 5, 219-269.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s43253-024-00122-4
[9] He, Z. (2025) Debate as a Pedagogical Tool for Pluralist Economics Education. Review of Radical Political Economics, 57, 429-436.
https://doi.org/10.1177/04866134241268407
[10] Facione, P.A. (1990) Critical Thinking: A Statement of Expert Consensus for Purposes of Educational Assessment and Instruction: The Delphi Report. California Academic Press.
[11] Abrami, P.C., Bernard, R.M., Borokhovski, E., Waddington, D.I., Wade, C.A. and Persson, T. (2015) Strategies for Teaching Students to Think Critically: A Meta-Analysis. Review of Educational Research, 85, 275-314.
https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654314551063
[12] Kuhn, D. (1999) A Developmental Model of Critical Thinking. Educational Researcher, 28, 16-46.
https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189x028002016
[13] Kuhn, T.S. and Hacking, I. (2012) The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. 4th Edition, University of Chicago Press.
https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226458144.001.0001
[14] Duschl, R.A. and Grandy, R. (2013) Two Views about Explicitly Teaching Nature of Science. Science & Education, 22, 2109-2139.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-012-9539-4
[15] Matthews, M.R. (2014) Science Teaching: The Contribution of History and Philosophy of Science. Routledge.
[16] Anderson, L.W. and Krathwohl, D.R. (2001) A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching, and Assessing: A Revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy of Educational Objectives. Longman.
[17] 王春雷, 万勇, 罗永华. 数字经济背景下经济学课程教学改革探究[J]. 教育观察, 2025, 14(1): 98-101.