基于长短期记忆网络的常见钻井工况识别方法研究
Study on the Identification of Common Drilling Operating Conditions Based on a Long Short-Term Memory Network
DOI: 10.12677/me.2026.145129, PDF,   
作者: 程柑溶, 段 正, 杨 周:重庆科技大学石油与天然气工程学院,重庆;吴达越:中国石油集团长城钻探钻井二公司,辽宁 盘锦
关键词: 钻井工况门控机制长期依赖LSTM模型Drilling Conditions Gating Mechanism Long-Term Dependency LSTM Model
摘要: 为解决基于阈值设定和专家经验的钻井工况识别方法在时序建模与分类精度的局限,本文提出了一种基于长短期记忆网络的钻井工况识别方法。该方法通过门控机制有效捕捉钻井过程中时序数据的长期依赖关系,能够自动学习不同工况在时间维度上的变化趋势,并通过堆叠多层LSTM单元增强特征提取能力,并在LSTM输出端接入前馈全连接神经网络进行工况分类,以学习最优模型参数。选用川渝地区10口已完钻的水平井的实时钻井数据,对ANN、RNN、CNN、LSTM模型进行了性能测试,结果表明:LSTM模型在所有评估指标上均表现出最优异的性能,其精确率达到0.94,精度和召回率均为0.95,最终得到高达0.96的F1分数,这充分说明了LSTM模型能够有效捕捉这些复杂的序列特征,能够有效学习并记忆关键信息,从而实现最准确的分类预测。该方法为钻井工况的精准识别提供了新的技术路线,并对推动钻井监督智能化升级具有重要意义。
Abstract: To address the limitations of drilling operating condition identification methods based on threshold settings and expert experience in terms of time-series modeling and classification accuracy, this study proposes a drilling operating condition identification method based on a long short-term memory (LSTM) network. Through its gating mechanism, the proposed method effectively captures the long-term dependencies in time-series drilling data and automatically learns the temporal variation patterns associated with different operating conditions. Multiple LSTM layers are stacked to enhance feature extraction, and a feedforward fully connected neural network is connected to the output of the LSTM network for operating condition classification and optimal model parameter learning. Real-time drilling data from 10 completed horizontal wells in the Sichuan-Chongqing region were selected to evaluate the performance of ANN, RNN, CNN, and LSTM models. The results show that the LSTM model achieves the best performance across all evaluation metrics, with a precision of 0.94, an accuracy and recall of 0.95, and an F1-score of 0.96. These results demonstrate that the LSTM model can effectively capture complex sequential features and learn and retain critical information, thereby achieving highly accurate classification. The proposed method provides a new technical approach for the accurate identification of drilling operating conditions and is of great significance for promoting the intelligent upgrading of drilling supervision.
文章引用:程柑溶, 段正, 杨周, 吴达越. 基于长短期记忆网络的常见钻井工况识别方法研究[J]. 矿山工程, 2026, 14(5): 1305-1315. https://doi.org/10.12677/me.2026.145129

参考文献

[1] 李雷, 韩烈祥, 姚建林. 参数耦合在粒子冲击钻井智能决策系统中的应用[J]. 钻采工艺, 2020, 43(3): 4-6, 45, 1.
[2] Yang, X., Wu, M., Lu, C., Li, W., Chen, L. and Du, S. (2024) Prediction of Rate of Penetration Based on Drilling Conditions Identification for Drilling Process. Neurocomputing, 579, Article ID: 127439.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neucom.2024.127439
[3] 永旺, 李坤, 管志川, 等. 降低井底岩石抗钻能力的钻速提高方法研究及钻头设计[J]. 石油钻探技术, 2024, 52(3): 11-20.
[4] 李威明, 侍德益, 王浩, 等. 钻井过程中井漏预警方法研究[J]. 石化技术, 2025, 32(10): 228-230.
[5] Yasseri, S. (2017) Drilling Risk Identification, Filtering, Ranking and Management. International Journal of Coastal and Offshore Engineering, 1, 17-26.
https://doi.org/10.18869/acadpub.ijcoe.1.1.17
[6] 胡志强, 杨进, 王磊, 等. 钻井工况智能识别与时效分析技术[J]. 石油钻采工艺, 2022, 44(2): 241-246.
[7] 孙挺, 赵颖, 杨进, 等. 基于支持向量机的钻井工况实时智能识别方法[J]. 石油钻探技术, 2019, 47(5): 28-33.
[8] 刘胜娃, 曹湘华. 基于决策树的钻井工况智能识别方法[J]. 新型工业化, 2022, 12(1): 28-30.
[9] 江萍, 孟祥芹, 鲍泽富. 应用神经网络技术诊断钻井事故[J]. 西安石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2008(2): 99-102, 121.
[10] 王正, 宋先知, 李洪松, 等. 基于1dCNN-BiGRU和注意力机制的钻井工况智能识别方法[J]. 石油科学通报, 2025, 10(5): 926-940.
[11] Yin, Q., Yang, J., Zhou, B., Jiang, M., Chen, X., Fu, C., et al. (2018) Improve the Drilling Operations Efficiency by the Big Data Mining of Real-Time Logging. SPE/IADC Middle East Drilling Technology Conference and Exhibition, Abu Dhabi, 29-31 January 2018, SPE-189330-MS.
https://doi.org/10.2118/189330-ms
[12] 闫铁, 许瑞, 刘维凯, 等. 中国智能化钻井技术研究发展[J]. 东北石油大学学报, 2020, 44(4): 15-21, 6.
[13] Yin, Q., Yang, J., Tyagi, M., Zhou, X., Hou, X. and Cao, B. (2021) Field Data Analysis and Risk Assessment of Gas Kick during Industrial Deepwater Drilling Process Based on Supervised Learning Algorithm. Process Safety and Environmental Protection, 146, 312-328.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psep.2020.08.012
[14] Yin, Q., Yang, J., Tyagi, M., Zhou, X., Hou, X., Wang, N., et al. (2021) Machine Learning for Deepwater Drilling: Gas-Kick-Alarm Classification Using Pilot-Scale Rig Data with Combined Surface-Riser-Downhole Monitoring. SPE Journal, 26, 1773-1799.
https://doi.org/10.2118/205365-pa
[15] Bengio, Y., Simard, P. and Frasconi, P. (1994) Learning Long-Term Dependencies with Gradient Descent Is Difficult. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks, 5, 157-166.
https://doi.org/10.1109/72.279181
[16] Arnaout, A., Fruhwirth, R., Esmael, B. and Thonhauser, G. (2012) Intelligent Real-Time Drilling Operations Classification Using Trend Analysis of Drilling Rig Sensors Data. SPE Kuwait International Petroleum Conference and Exhibition, Kuwait City, 10-12 December 2012, SPE-163302-MS.
https://doi.org/10.2118/163302-ms
[17] 殷启帅, 杨进, 曹博涵, 等. 基于长短期记忆神经网络的深水钻井工况实时智能判别模型[J]. 石油钻采工艺, 2022, 44(1): 97-104.
[18] Ben, Y.X., James, C. and Cao, D. (2019) Development and Application of a Real-Time Drilling State Classification Algorithm with Machine Learning. Proceedings of the 7th Unconventional Resources Technology Conference, Denver, 22-24 July 2019, URTEC-2019-253-MS.
https://doi.org/10.15530/urtec-2019-253
[19] 罗鸣, 李盛阳, 彭巍, 等. 基于深度卷积特征重构的井漏事故预测[J]. 计算机仿真, 2023, 40(7): 82-88.
[20] 檀朝东, 陈培堯, 杨亚少, 等. 时序示功图驱动的抽油机井结蜡预测及清蜡效果评价[J]. 石油钻采工艺, 2022, 44(1): 123-130.
[21] Lee, K., Lim, J., Yoon, D. and Jung, H. (2019) Prediction of Shale-Gas Production at Duvernay Formation Using Deep-Learning Algorithm. SPE Journal, 24, 2423-2437.
https://doi.org/10.2118/195698-pa