融合多维交互特征的电商直播异常行为识别模型及风控策略研究
Research on an E-Commerce Live Streaming Anomaly Detection Model and Risk Control Strategy Incorporating Multi-Dimensional Interaction Features
摘要: 针对电商直播场景下恶意刷单、虚假互动和恶意套取平台优惠等异常行为影响平台交易秩序与用户体验的问题,本文构建了一种融合多维交互特征的电商直播异常行为识别模型。区别于传统主要依赖交易金额、消费频次和最近消费时间等静态交易特征的识别方法,本文结合直播场景的实时互动特征与账号关联特征,引入弹幕频率、停留时长、设备IP聚集度等变量,形成面向电商直播场景的改进特征体系。针对风控场景正负样本极度不均衡的问题,采用SMOTE算法进行过采样平衡处理,并系统对比了逻辑回归、随机森林与XGBoost模型在分类任务中的性能。实验表明,结合SMOTE处理的XGBoost模型异常识别效果最优,F1-score达0.976,AUC接近1.0。进一步通过SHAP可解释性分析发现,弹幕频率和设备IP聚集度对模型预测结果的贡献较高,说明在电商直播异常行为识别中,交互特征和网络关联特征相较于单一交易特征具有更强的判别作用。基于上述结果,本文进一步提出实时流计算监测、账号关系图谱关联分析和分级风控处置策略,为电商直播平台异常行为识别与风险控制提供参考。
Abstract: To address the issues of abnormal behaviors such as malicious click fraud, fake interactions, and malicious exploitation of platform discounts in e-commerce live streaming scenarios, which disrupt transaction order and user experience, this paper constructs an e-commerce live streaming abnormal behavior recognition model integrating multi-dimensional interaction features. Unlike traditional methods primarily relying on static transaction features like transaction amount, consumption frequency, and recent consumption time, this study combines real-time interaction features of live streaming scenarios with account association features, introducing variables such as danmu frequency, dwell time, and device IP clustering degree to form an improved feature system tailored for e-commerce live streaming. To tackle the extreme imbalance of positive and negative samples in risk control scenarios, the SMOTE algorithm is employed for oversampling and balancing. Systematic comparisons were conducted among logistic regression, random forest, and XGBoost models in classification tasks. Experiments demonstrate that the XGBoost model with SMOTE processing achieves the best abnormal recognition performance, with an F1-score of 0.976 and an AUC close to 1.0. Further SHAP interpretability analysis reveals that danmu frequency and device IP clustering degree contribute significantly to model prediction results, indicating that interaction features and network association features play a stronger discriminative role than single transaction features in e-commerce live streaming abnormal behavior recognition. Based on these findings, this paper further proposes real-time streaming computation monitoring, account relationship graph association analysis, and hierarchical risk control strategies, providing reference for abnormal behavior identification and risk management in e-commerce live streaming platforms.
文章引用:艾健雄, 高梓仪, 吴雨桐. 融合多维交互特征的电商直播异常行为识别模型及风控策略研究[J]. 电子商务评论, 2026, 15(9): 322-331. https://doi.org/10.12677/ecl.2026.1591002

参考文献

[1] Purboyo, P., Said, L.R., Firdaus, M.R. and Mayvita, P.A. (2025) A Systematic Literature Review on Live-Streaming Commerce: Trends, Consumer Behavior, and Business Implications. Access JournalAccess to Science, Business, Innovation in the Digital Economy, 6, 437-451.
https://doi.org/10.46656/access.2025.6.2(11)
[2] Vanini, P., Rossi, S., Zvizdic, E. and Domenig, T. (2023) Online Payment Fraud: From Anomaly Detection to Risk Management. Financial Innovation, 9, Article No. 66.
https://doi.org/10.1186/s40854-023-00470-w
[3] 漆亚林, 杨婧童. S-O-R理论视域下情绪、感知对电商直播用户购买行为的中介效应研究[J]. 新闻界, 2024(8): 55-65.
[4] 袁海霞, 黄丽雯. 电商直播互动模式对消费者购买意愿的影响研究[J]. 哈尔滨商业大学学报(社会科学版), 2022(6): 19-30.
[5] 魏剑锋, 李孟娜, 刘保平. 电商直播中主播特性对消费者冲动购买意愿的影响[J]. 中国流通经济, 2022, 36(4): 32-42.
[6] 韩召, 杜刚, 熊爱华, 等. 明星代言还是主播“场外代言”?——两种代言类型对购买意愿的影响机制研究[J]. 外国经济与管理, 2022, 44(3): 53-68.
[7] 刘江. 电商主播语言风格对消费者冲动性购买意愿的影响——基于心流体验的中介和电子口碑的调节作用[J]. 商业经济研究, 2025(14): 67-70.
[8] Zhao, Y. (2025) RK-W-Stacking: A Hybrid Model Combining Entropy-Weighted RFM-K-Means Clustering and Weighted Stacking Ensemble for User Consumption Prediction. Informatica, 49, 107-118.
https://doi.org/10.31449/inf.v49i32.9086
[9] Hilal, W., Gadsden, S.A. and Yawney, J. (2022) Financial Fraud: A Review of Anomaly Detection Techniques and Recent Advances. Expert Systems with Applications, 193, Article ID: 116429.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2021.116429
[10] Zhao, Z. and Bai, T. (2022) Financial Fraud Detection and Prediction in Listed Companies Using SMOTE and Machine Learning Algorithms. Entropy, 24, Article 1157.
https://doi.org/10.3390/e24081157
[11] Piao, C., Wang, N. and Yuan, C. (2023) Rebalance Weights Adaboost‐SVM Model for Imbalanced Data. Computational Intelligence and Neuroscience, 2023, Article ID: 4860536.
https://doi.org/10.1155/2023/4860536
[12] Ikermane, M., Mohy-Eddine, M. and Rachidi, Y. (2025) Credit Card Fraud Detection: Comparing Random Forest and Xgboost Models with Explainable AI Interpretations. In: Aboudrar, I., Ilahi Bakhsh, F., Nayyar, A. and Ouachtouk, I., Eds., Innovative Technologies on Electrical Power Systems for Smart Cities Infrastructure, Springer, 126-135.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-86705-7_12
[13] 吕鹏, 周旅军, 范晓光. 平台治理场域与社会学参与[J]. 社会学研究, 2022, 37(3): 68-91, 227-228.
[14] 邱科达, 宋姗姗, 张李义. 我国直播电商政策量化分析与优化建议[J]. 当代经济管理, 2024, 46(4): 24-36.
[15] 丁国峰. 协同共治视角下网络直播带货法律治理体系的构建[J]. 学术论坛, 2024, 47(2): 18-31.