直播电商平台银发消费者群体的权益保障困境与对策研究
Research on the Dilemma and Countermeasures of Rights Protection for Senior Consumers in Live-Streaming E-Commerce Platforms
摘要: 随着我国老龄化进程的加速和数字技术的普及,银发群体正加速融入数字社会,成为直播电商中不可忽视的消费力量。然而,该群体在直播购物中的权益保障问题日益凸显:法律层面,现有法规滞后、多元主体责任划分模糊,尤其是“私域直播”场景下的监管严重缺位;侵害行为层面,直播平台对老年人进行“情感绑架”,并对其自身存在的“健康焦虑”进行过度营销,以“隐蔽化”“无痕化”的私域运营方式规避责任;维权能力层面,老年人本身维权意识与能力不足、直播的即时性和信息不对称更加剧了其举证困难程度。对此,本文提出系统性对策:应完善以《直播电商监督管理办法》为核心的一系列法律规范,明确平台全链条责任,特别是将私域交易纳入有效监管;强化平台的技术治理责任,完善针对老年人的风险预警与证据保全机制;最后构建由法律法规、平台履责、家庭教育、行业自律共同形成的“社会共治”防护体系,切实保障银发消费者的知情权、公平交易权与求偿权,形成全方面、多层次的权益保障网络。
Abstract: With the acceleration of the aging process in China and the widespread adoption of digital technology, the elderly population is rapidly integrating into the digital society and has become an indispensable consumer force in live-stream e-commerce. However, the issue of rights protection for this group in live-stream shopping has become increasingly prominent: at the legal level, the existing regulations are lagging behind, and the division of multiple responsibilities is ambiguous; especially in the “private domain live-streaming” scenario, the supervision is seriously lacking; at the level of infringement, live-streaming platforms “emotionally manipulate” the elderly and over-market their own “health anxiety”, using “hidden” and “invisible” private domain operation methods to evade responsibility; at the level of rights protection capabilities, the elderly themselves have insufficient awareness and ability to protect their rights, and the immediacy of live-streaming and information asymmetry further exacerbate the difficulty of their evidence presentation. In response to this, this article proposes systematic countermeasures: a series of legal norms centered on the “Live-stream E-commerce Supervision Measures” should be improved, and the full-chain responsibility of the platform should be clarified, especially including the effective supervision of private domain transactions; strengthening the technical governance responsibility of the platform, improving the risk warning and evidence preservation mechanism for the elderly; finally, a “social co-governance” protection system composed of laws and regulations, platform compliance, family education, and industry self-discipline should be constructed, to effectively protect the right to information, fair trading rights, and claim rights of the elderly consumers, and form a comprehensive and multi-level rights protection network.
文章引用:王品轩. 直播电商平台银发消费者群体的权益保障困境与对策研究[J]. 电子商务评论, 2026, 15(9): 341-347. https://doi.org/10.12677/ecl.2026.1591004

参考文献

[1] 金梦菡, 徐慧, 龚先旻, 等. 主播情绪唤醒度对中老年人直播购物的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2026, 42(1): 50-59.
[2] 邓汉慧, 张子刚. 西蒙的有限理性研究综述[J]. 中国地质大学学报(社会科学版), 2004, 4(6): 37-41.
[3] 李颖. “银发族”直播购物踩坑 数字时代如何避坑[J]. 中国质量万里行, 2026(1): 46-47.
[4] 蒋永霞. 直播电商迈入规范时代[J]. 宁波经济(财经视点), 2026(2): 46-47.
[5] 张馨月, 张冰. 以案释法: 私域直播“围猎”银发族不可回避[J]. 中国质量万里行, 2026(1): 50-51.
[6] 张晓艳. 网络直播视角下电商差异化营销策略研究[J]. 现代营销, 2026(4): 43-45.
[7] 刘金瑞. 合理设定电子商务平台责任 保障电子商务健康有序发展[J]. 中国信息安全, 2018(8): 96-98.
[8] 苟明. 市场监管部门重拳整治私域直播乱象[J]. 中国质量监管, 2025(10): 26-28.
[9] 周辉, 魏日升. 直播电商治理的现实困境与优化路径[J]. 中国市场监管研究, 2025(10): 25-32.
[10] 刘家明, 李洁莹. 放管服视域下平台型治理的生成逻辑、运行机理与效能转化机制[J]. 岭南学刊, 2021(5): 34-41.
[11] 马辉. 消费决策机制变迁视角下的直播营销法律规制[J]. 当代法学, 2022, 36(2): 122-132.
[12] 程樯, 张楠. 媒介、话语与身份: 网络直播平台老年群体的身体叙事[J]. 当代电视, 2026(1): 51-57.