人工智能通识课程中课程思政元素的融入路径与实践——以成都工业学院《人工智能技术概论》为例
The Integration Path and Practice of Curriculum Ideological and Political Elements in General Artificial Intelligence Courses—A Case Study of Introduction to Artificial Intelligence Technology in Chengdu Technological University
DOI: 10.12677/ae.2026.1691974, PDF,    科研立项经费支持
作者: 刘心怡:成都工业学院数智设计学院,四川 成都
关键词: 人工智能通识课程课程思政融入路径General Artificial Intelligence Courses Curriculum Ideological and Political Education Integration Path
摘要: 课程思政是落实立德树人根本任务的重要抓手。人工智能通识课程受众广、跨学科、时代性强,是课程思政建设的重要场域。本研究聚焦人工智能通识课程中课程思政“融什么、怎么融、融到哪”三个核心问题,围绕人工智能课程中重点章节,提出“知识模块–思政元素–教学方法–典型案例”融合方案,并在成都工业学院《人工智能技术概论》课程两年教学实践中加以验证。研究表明,该路径能够显著提升学生的AI素养、科技报国信念与工程伦理意识,为主动应对生成式人工智能带来的教育变革提供可复制、可推广的实践范式。
Abstract: Curriculum ideological and political education is a crucial approach to implementing the fundamental task of fostering virtue through education. General artificial intelligence courses feature a wide audience, interdisciplinary attributes and distinct contemporaneity, serving as an important carrier for the construction of curriculum ideological and political education. Focusing on three core issues of what to integrate, how to integrate, and where to integrate ideological and political elements into general artificial intelligence courses, this study puts forward an integration framework consisting of knowledge modules, ideological and political elements, teaching methods, and typical cases for key chapters of artificial intelligence courses. The framework has been verified through two years of teaching practice in the course Introduction to Artificial Intelligence Technology at Chengdu Technological University. The research results show that the proposed integration path can effectively improve students’ artificial intelligence literacy, strengthen their aspiration to serve the country through science and technology, and enhance their awareness of engineering ethics. It provides a replicable and promotable practical paradigm for responding to educational changes brought by generative artificial intelligence.
文章引用:刘心怡. 人工智能通识课程中课程思政元素的融入路径与实践——以成都工业学院《人工智能技术概论》为例[J]. 教育进展, 2026, 16(9): 875-886. https://doi.org/10.12677/ae.2026.1691974

参考文献

[1] http://www.moe.gov.cn/jyb_xwfb/xw_zt/moe_357/jyzt_2018n/2018_zt19/zt1819_gd/mtpl/pljyb/201809/t20180914_348688.html
[2] http://www.moe.gov.cn/srcsite/A12/s7060/201712/t20171206_320698.html
[3] 教育部关于印发《高等学校课程思政建设指导纲要》的通知[EB/OL].
http://www.moe.gov.cn/srcsite/A08/s7056/202006/t20200603_462437.html, 2026-08-09.
[4] 任珂, 赵雪梅. 生成式人工智能在高等教育中的应用情境、面临挑战与应对策略——基于国内外研究的系统性文献综述[J]. 数字教育, 2026, 12(1): 47-54.
[5] 杨中亚, 张龙, 刘龙飞. 人工智能赋能《体育测量与评价》课程思政效果增值评价的模型设计与实施路径[J]. 中国现代教育学报, 2026, 2(1): 67-73.
[6] Rudolph, J., Tan, S. and Tan, S. (2023) ChatGPT: Bullshit Spewer or the End of Traditional Assessments in Higher Education? Journal of Applied Learning & Teaching, 6, 342-363.
[7] Tlili, A., Shehata, B., Adarkwah, M.A., Bozkurt, A., Hickey, D.T., Huang, R., et al. (2023) What If the Devil Is My Guardian Angel: ChatGPT as a Case Study of Using Chatbots in Education. Smart Learning Environments, 10, Article No. 15.
https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-023-00237-x
[8] 王露凝, 何佳佳, 韦日莲, 等. 基于课程思政与人工智能的混合式教学改革探索[J]. 中国科学与技术学报, 2025, 1(3): 175-179.
[9] 孙仁卫. 人工智能赋能高校思政教育的发展困境与实践路径[J]. 辽宁经济职业技术学院[J]. 辽宁经济管理干部学院学报, 2025(6): 69-71.
[10] 朱加俊, 高德鹏. 教学创新视角下的人工智能课程思政与数字赋能的融合路径[J]. 中国科学与技术学报, 2025, 1(3): 122-127.
[11] 郭强. 人工智能时代下高校计算机专业课程思政实施路径探索[J]. 教育理论与研究, 2025, 3(20), 123-125.
[12] Chan, C.K.Y. (2023) A Comprehensive AI Policy Education Framework for University Teaching and Learning. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 20, Article No. 38.
https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-023-00408-3
[13] Kamalov, F., Santandreu Calonge, D. and Gurrib, I. (2023) New Era of Artificial Intelligence in Education: Towards a Sustainable Multifaceted Revolution. Sustainability, 15, Article 12451.
https://doi.org/10.3390/su151612451
[14] Crawley, E.F., Malmqvist, J., Östlund, S., et al. (2014) Rethinking Engineering Education: The CDIO Approach. 2nd Edition, Springer.
[15] The CDIO Initiative (2026) CDIO Standards 3.0.
https://cdio.org/content/cdio-standards-30
[16] ABET (2026) Accreditation Criteria & Supporting Documents.
https://www.abet.org/accreditation/accreditation-criteria/
[17] Massachusetts Institute of Technology (2019) An Exploration and Review of Ethics Instruction Methods for Undergraduate Engineering Students and an Examination of the MIT Mechanical Engineering Department’s Current Practices in Teaching Ethics. MIT Department of Mechanical Engineering.
[18] Shulman, L.S. (1986) Those Who Understand: Knowledge Growth in Teaching. Educational Researcher, 15, 4-14.
https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189x015002004
[19] Mishra, P. and Koehler, M.J. (2006) Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge: A Framework for Teacher Knowledge. Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education, 108, 1017-1054.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9620.2006.00684.x
[20] Koehler, M.J. and Mishra, P. (2009) What Is Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge? Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 9, 60-70.
[21] Biggs, J. (1996) Enhancing Teaching through Constructive Alignment. Higher Education, 32, 347-364.
https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00138871
[22] Biggs, J. and Tang, C. (2011) Teaching for Quality Learning at University: What the Student Does. 4th Edition, Open University Press.
[23] Bijker, W.E., Hughes, T.P., Pinch, T.J., et al. (2012) The Social Construction of Technological Systems: New Directions in the Sociology and History of Technology. MIT Press.
[24] Jasanoff, S. (2016) The Ethics of Invention: Technology and the Human Future. Harvard University Press.
[25] Friedman, B., Hendry, D.G. and Borning, A. (2017) A Survey of Value Sensitive Design Methods. Foundations and Trends in Human-Computer Interaction, 11, 63-125.
https://doi.org/10.1561/1100000015
[26] Philosophy, Engineering & Technology (2026) Value Sensitive Design: Four Challenges.
https://www.slideshare.net/slideshow/ibo-fpetvsd/4142399
[27] Abramenka-Lachheb, V., Lachheb, A. and Ozogul, G. (2025) Value-Sensitive Design in the Praxis of Instructional Design: A View of Designers in Situ. British Journal of Educational Technology, 56, 1311-1349.
https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13574
[28] Long, D. and Magerko, B. (2020) What Is AI Literacy? Competencies and Design Considerations. Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Honolulu, 25-30 April 2020, 1-16.
https://doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376727
[29] Ng, D.T.K., Leung, J.K.L., Chu, S.K.W. and Qiao, M.S. (2021) Conceptualizing AI Literacy: An Exploratory Review. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 2, Article 100041.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2021.100041
[30] UNESCO (2024) AI Competency Framework for Students. UNESCO.
[31] UNESCO (2023) Guidance for Generative AI in Education and Research. UNESCO.
https://www.unesco.org/en/articles/guidance-generative-ai-education-and-research
[32] 【理响中国】强化科技教育和人文教育协同[EB/OL].
http://theory.people.com.cn/n1/2024/1017/c40531-40341125.html, 2026-08-21.
[33] Adiguzel, T., Kaya, M.H. and Cansu, F.K. (2023) Revolutionizing Education with AI: Exploring the Transformative Potential of ChatGPT. Contemporary Educational Technology, 15, ep429.
https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/13152
[34] 刘心怡. 从理论到实践: 人工智能通识课程的教学改革与实验设计探讨[J]. 教育进展, 2026, 16(1): 879-886.