零工经济视域下产业后备军的再思考
Rethinking the Industrial Reserve Army in the Context of the Gig Economy
摘要: 当代产业后备军的形态与运作逻辑转变,是理解资本积累过程与雇佣关系的核心基础。本文依托马克思产业后备军理论,结合零工经济的发展特征,重新梳理了当代产业后备军的形态变化,剖析其运作逻辑的调整方向,探讨零工经济下产业后备军的当代境遇,最终探寻实现其解放的可能路径。研究认为,当代产业后备军正经历从传统失业群体向广泛社会阶层扩散的结构性转型。在零工经济作用的凸显下,当代产业后备军的形成不再仅依靠劳动力市场的供求波动,而是同时发生在就业状态内部与家庭再生产领域之中。这一双重隐匿,也让“后备”从一种固定身份转变为一种持续处境。
Abstract: The transformation in the form and operational logic of the contemporary industrial reserve army constitutes the core foundation for understanding the process of capital accumulation and employment relations. Drawing on Marx’s theory of the industrial reserve army and incorporating the developmental features of the gig economy, this paper re-examines the evolving forms of the contemporary industrial reserve army, analyzes the reorientation of its operational logic, explores the contemporary conditions under which it emerges within the gig economy, and ultimately investigates potential pathways toward its emancipation. This study argues that the contemporary industrial reserve army is undergoing a structural transition, expanding from its traditional base among the unemployed to a broader diffusion across diverse social strata. With the growing prominence of the gig economy, the formation of the contemporary industrial reserve army is no longer determined solely by fluctuations in labor market supply and demand; rather, it takes place simultaneously within the sphere of employment itself and within the domain of family reproduction. This dual process of invisibilization has transformed the notion of “reserve” from a fixed identity into a persistent condition.
文章引用:美合日班·亚尔麦麦提. 零工经济视域下产业后备军的再思考[J]. 哲学进展, 2026, 15(9): 204-210. https://doi.org/10.12677/acpp.2026.159439

参考文献

[1] 王庆丰, 苗翠翠. “产业后备军”的生命政治[J]. 国外理论动态, 2019(4): 16-25.
[2] Jonna, R.J. and Foster, J.B. (2016) Marx’s Theory of Working-Class Precariousness: Its Relevance Today. Monthly Review, 67, 21-45.
https://doi.org/10.14452/mr-067-11-2016-04_1
[3] (美)阿恩∙卡勒伯格, 凯文∙赫威森, (韩)申光荣. 有工作的穷人: 全球化与亚洲地区不稳定就业[M]. 张凌, 译. 北京: 中国科学技术出版社, 2023.
[4] 马克思恩格斯选集: 第2卷[M]. 北京: 人民出版社, 2012: 231.
[5] 王鹏飞. 平台经济下零工劳动者保护的规范危机与劳动关系认定[J]. 深圳大学学报(人文社会科学版), 2024, 41(6): 103-111.
[6] 任保平, 逄文佐. 数智经济时代马克思劳动价值论的拓展研究[J]. 当代经济研究, 2026(4): 24-33.
[7] 伊德利∙科隆比尼, 张若辰. 平台资本主义与产业后备军[J]. 当代中国马克思主义研究, 2024(2): 143-158.
[8] 陈英杰. 平台经济下“零工后备军”现存困境及对策分析[J]. 甘肃开放大学学报, 2023, 33(5): 84-88.
[9] Rodgers, G. and Rodgers, J. (1989) Precarious Jobs in Labour Market Regulation: The Growth of Atypical Employment in Western Europe. International Institute for Labour Studies.
[10] 汪建华. 灵活用工与资本劳动力经营职能的发展——基于弹性积累体制的分析[J]. 社会学研究, 2025, 40(1): 203-225, 230.
[11] Bernard, S. (2025) Uberization and Overexploitation: Racial Platform Capitalism in Paris, London and Montréal. Palgrave Macmillan.
[12] 何里程. 灵活就业群体的职业边界及社会功能分析[J]. 人口与社会, 2025, 41(3): 37-45.
[13] 魏丽. 新经济形态下我国产业工人的发展演变及其实践启示[J]. 高校马克思主义理论研究, 2025, 11(3): 141-150.
[14] 丁瑜, 梁家恩. 外发工厂妇女的劳动生活困境与应对: 一个零工经济与性别融合的分析[J]. 妇女研究论丛, 2021(6): 32-49.
[15] 玛丽亚∙米斯. 父权制与资本积累: 国际劳动分工中的女性[M]. 李昕一, 徐明强, 译. 上海: 上海书店出版社, 2023.
[16] Munro, K. (2019) “Social Reproduction Theory,” Social Reproduction, and Household Production. Science & Society, 83, 451-468.
https://doi.org/10.1521/siso.2019.83.4.451
[17] Pettas, D. (2024) Platform Labour on the Margins and beyond the Digital Realm: Mapping the Landscape of “Platform-Generated Labour” in the Digitally Mediated Short-Term Rental Market. Digital Geography and Society, 6, Article ID: 100082.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diggeo.2024.100082
[18] 齐昊, 田勋. 平台经济中的“无保障工作”——一个马克思主义政治经济学的分析框架[J]. 国外理论动态, 2022(4): 139-148.
[19] Pais, I. and Zanoni, P. (2024) Deepening or Buffering the Crisis of Social Reproduction under Capitalism? The Case of Digital Care and Domestic Work Platforms. Labour & Law Issues, 10, 77-105.
[20] 蒂姆∙克里斯蒂安斯, 姜昆. 平台合作主义与零工经济中无支配的自由[J]. 马克思主义与现实, 2025(2): 168-176.
[21] 陈龙, 赵磊, 盛禾. 隐匿的她: 女外卖骑手是否遭受算法性别歧视? [J]. 妇女研究论丛, 2025(5): 38-49.