平台语境下无偿数字劳动的异化表征、生成逻辑与治理路径
Alienation Manifestations, Generative Logic, and Governance Pathways of Unpaid Digital Labor in the Platform Context
摘要: 在数字平台快速发展的背景下,社交媒体用户的内容生产、互动行为与行为数据被平台无偿占有并转化为具有价值增殖功能的无偿数字劳动。本文以马克思异化劳动理论四重维度为分析视角,结合本土社交媒体场景,考察这一现象的具体表现与形成原因,并专门讨论数字劳动中愉悦体验与被控制并存的悖论,由此探讨数字劳动对经典异化概念的扩展。研究发现,平台语境下的无偿数字劳动呈现出用户数据与内容分离、劳动过程算法化、自主活动工具化、社会关系数字联结化四重异化表征;其生成是平台资本增殖逻辑、算法技术不透明、用户权利边界模糊与流量导向共同作用的结果。在此基础上,本文从界定数据产权归属、建立算法审计制度、保障用户权利行使、改善平台流量分配规则等方面探讨治理路径,为理解数字劳动异化问题提供一种分析思路。
Abstract: Against the backdrop of the rapid development of digital platforms, social media users’ content production, interactive behaviors, and behavioral data are appropriated by platforms without compensation and transformed into unpaid digital labor with value-augmenting functions. Taking the four dimensions of Marx’s theory of alienated labor as an analytical framework and drawing on domestic social media contexts, this paper examines the concrete manifestations and causes of this phenomenon. It also focuses on the paradoxical coexistence of pleasurable experiences and being controlled in digital labor, thereby exploring how digital labor expands the classical concept of alienation. The study finds that unpaid digital labor in the platform context exhibits four forms of alienation: the separation of user data from content, the algorithmization of the labor process, the instrumentalization of autonomous activities, and the digital interconnectedness of social relations. Its emergence results from the combined effects of the valorization logic of platform capital, the opacity of algorithmic technologies, ambiguous boundaries surrounding user rights, and traffic orientation. On this basis, the paper explores governance pathways, including clarifying the ownership of data property rights, establishing an algorithmic audit system, safeguarding the exercise of user rights, and improving platform traffic-distribution rules, thereby providing an analytical approach to understanding the alienation of digital labor.
文章引用:朱赖蕙. 平台语境下无偿数字劳动的异化表征、生成逻辑与治理路径[J]. 哲学进展, 2026, 15(9): 211-219. https://doi.org/10.12677/acpp.2026.159440

参考文献

[1] 中国互联网络信息中心. 第57次中国互联网络发展状况统计报告[R]. 北京: 中国互联网络信息中心, 2026.
[2] 克里斯蒂安·福克斯. 数字劳动与卡尔·马克思[M]. 周延云, 译. 北京: 人民出版社, 2020: 45-62.
[3] Terranova, T. (2000) Free Labor: Producing Culture for the Digital Economy. Social Text, 18, 33-58.
https://doi.org/10.1215/01642472-18-2_63-33
[4] Kücklich, J. (2005) Precarious Playbour: Modders and the Digital Games Industry. The Fibreculture Journal, No. 5, 1-5.
[5] Hesmondhalgh, D. (2010) User-Generated Content, Free Labour and the Cultural Industries. Ephemera: Theory & Politics in Organization, 10, 267-284.
[6] 李少武, 张衔. 数据税的政治经济学分析[J]. 财经科学, 2025(8): 48-58.
[7] 蓝江. 从幽灵对象到幽灵智能——浅论智能时代的物与劳动的历史演进[J]. 理论与改革, 2023(4): 52-63.
[8] 聂阳. 马克思资本批判视域下的数字劳动异化及其扬弃[J]. 理论探索, 2022(1): 47-53.
[9] 韩文龙, 俞佳琦, 唐湘. 从组织控制到算法控制——数字劳动中控制方式的转向及其治理[J]. 中国经济问题, 2025(2): 29-41.
[10] 成龙, 王楠. 数字异化: 表象、根源及其破解途径[J]. 中国地质大学学报(社会科学版), 2022, 22(6): 1-11.
[11] 刘海霞. 数字劳动异化——对异化劳动理论的当代阐释[J]. 理论月刊, 2020(12): 14-22.
[12] 陈梦君, 冉光仙. 数字劳动背景下自由劳动的实现何以可能[J]. 铜仁学院学报, 2025, 27(3): 36-43.
[13] 马克思. 1844年经济学哲学手稿[M]. 北京: 人民出版社, 2018: 52-57.
[14] 李亚琪. 破解数字拜物教: 数字资本时代拜物教新形式批判[D]: [博士学位论文]. 长春: 吉林大学, 2021.
[15] 傅小兰, 张侃. 中国国民心理健康发展报告(2023-2024) [M]. 北京: 社会科学文献出版社, 2024: 135-142.
[16] 王志伟. 谁是年轻人的主要倾诉求助对象 调查显示好朋友排在首位[N/OL]. 中国青年报, 2024-10-03(03).
https://zqb.cyol.com/html/2024-10/03/nw.D110000zgqnb_20241003_4-03.htm