长期护理保险促进河北省养老服务消费的现实基础、制约因素与优化路径
The Realistic Foundation, Constraints, and Optimization Paths of Long-Term Care Insurance in Promoting Elderly Care Service Consumption in Hebei Province
DOI: 10.12677/fin.2026.165059, PDF,    科研立项经费支持
作者: 董明英:河北金融学院保险与财政学院,河北 保定;张艺馨:国家信息中心经济预测部,北京
关键词: 长期护理保险养老服务消费失能老人支付机制河北省Long-Term Care Insurance (LTCI) Consumption of Elderly Care Services Disabled Elderly Payment Mechanism Hebei Province
摘要: 长期护理保险通过稳定支付预期、降低正式照护服务使用成本,将部分家庭内部承担或未满足的照护需求转化为专业化、市场化养老服务消费。河北省长期护理保险已形成一定制度基础,2026年4月起在全省统一实施,但从保险支付向实际服务消费转化仍受需求识别、待遇支付、服务供给、专业人才和协同治理等因素制约。本文基于“失能风险–需求形成–保险支付–服务消费–供给响应”的分析逻辑,采用基于政策文本和公开资料的制度分析方法,从需求端、支付端、供给端、人才端和治理端五个维度,分析河北省长期护理保险促进养老服务消费的现实基础与制约因素,并提出优化路径。研究发现,需求识别不精准、待遇设计粗放、居家社区供给不足、护理人才短缺和部门数据分割等问题制约了“保险支付–有效需求–专业服务”的转化效率,提升该转化效率是发挥长期护理保险促进养老服务消费作用的关键,政策优化应推动从扩大覆盖向提高实际获得感、从统一待遇向按需保障、从费用报销向战略购买服务、从部门分治向跨部门协同的转变。
Abstract: Long-term care insurance (LTCI) transforms a portion of care needs that are either borne within families or remain unmet into professional and marketized elderly care service consumption by stabilizing payment expectations and lowering the effective cost of formal care services. In Hebei Province, LTCI has established a preliminary institutional foundation and has been implemented province-wide since April 2026. However, the transition from insurance payment to actual service consumption remains constrained by factors such as demand identification, benefit payment, service supply, professional workforce, and coordinated governance. Based on the analytical logic of “disability risk-demand formation-insurance payment-service consumption-supply response”, this paper adopts an institutional analysis approach grounded in policy texts and publicly available data, and examines the current foundation and constraints of LTCI in promoting elderly care service consumption in Hebei Province from five dimensions: the demand side, the payment side, the supply side, the workforce side, and the governance side, before proposing optimization paths. The study finds that imprecise demand identification, undifferentiated benefit design, insufficient home- and community-based service supply, shortage of nursing personnel, and fragmented departmental data have constrained the transformation efficiency of the “insurance payment-effective demand-professional services” chain. Enhancing this transformation efficiency is key to leveraging the role of LTCI in promoting elderly care service consumption. Policy optimization should thus promote a shift from expanding coverage to improving tangible benefits, from uniform benefits to needs-based security, from fee reimbursement to strategic purchasing of services, and from fragmented departmental governance to cross-departmental coordination.
文章引用:董明英, 张艺馨. 长期护理保险促进河北省养老服务消费的现实基础、制约因素与优化路径[J]. 金融, 2026, 16(5): 602-611. https://doi.org/10.12677/fin.2026.165059

参考文献

[1] 董明英, 王晓军. 中国老龄人口健康受损进展与持续时间研究[J]. 保险研究, 2021(7): 45-59.
[2] 王金营, 李天然. 中国老年失能年龄模式及未来失能人口预测[J]. 人口学刊, 2020, 42(5): 57-72.
[3] 陈秉正, 范宸. 中国老年人健康状态转移概率估计——基于两个数据库的比较分析[J]. 系统工程理论与实践, 2020, 40(11): 2848-2860.
[4] 王宗凡. 长期护理保障的中国道路: 从长期护理保险试点探索到全面建制[J]. 社会保障评论, 2025, 9(4): 1-19.
[5] 张盈华. 中国特色长期护理保险制度: 理论逻辑与政策选择[J]. 社会保障评论, 2025, 9(4): 20-31.
[6] 袁辉, 陈烁琦, 杜孟阳. 失能风险、长期护理保险与家庭消费[J]. 中国经济问题, 2025(2): 116-131.
[7] 王树, 苏杰, 姜迪. 老年照护保障与家庭消费——基于长护险试点的政策效应评估[J]. 当代经济科学, 2023, 45(6): 86-96.
[8] 于新亮, 黄俊铭, 张程荷. 农村长期护理保险对家庭消费的激励效应研究[J]. 金融经济学研究, 2025, 40(2): 114-129.
[9] 杨红燕, 邓智宇, 周致远. 服务或现金: 长期护理保险如何影响子女劳动参与——基于三重差分法的效应识别分析[J]. 保险研究, 2025(2): 53-67.
[10] 刘勇, 刘俊霞, 杨雪. 长期护理保险对家庭劳动力市场供给的影响[J]. 人口与发展, 2025, 31(1): 91-100.
[11] 朱铭来, 康琢. 长期护理保险嵌入养老服务体系的经济增长效应[J]. 财经理论与实践, 2024, 45(5): 18-24.
[12] 陈璐, 王璐. 长期护理保险与养老服务供给——基于新增市场主体视角的检验[J]. 经济学动态, 2024(3): 96-111.
[13] Verbrugge, L.M. and Jette, A.M. (1994) The Disablement Process. Social Science & Medicine, 38, 1-14.
https://doi.org/10.1016/0277-9536(94)90294-1