网络层级评价中的词汇重构——“夯”与“拉”语境反义现象探析
Lexical Reconstruction in Online Hierarchies—The Contextual Antonymy of “Hāng” and “Lā”
摘要: 网络层级评价体系中,“夯”与“拉”本无语义关联的两个汉字,在网络构式“从夯到拉”的压制下被临时捏合为一对语境反义词,分别承载“极好”与“极差”的评价功能。本文追溯了“夯”从明代《字汇》所收俗字,到北方方言表“笨拙”,再到借音闽南方言giâ并语法化为性质形容词的语义攀升路径;同时考察了“拉”从《说文解字》“摧也”的动作动词,到明清白话小说表“拖拽”,再到截取东北方言词“拉胯”并继承其消极语义韵的语义坠落过程。在此基础上,本文从语言经济原则与社会心理语用学视角出发,指出该现象是信息过载时代青年群体借助极简化语言符号进行认知降维、寻求高效沟通与群体认同的语用策略,亦是其在不确定性加剧的现实环境中通过符号秩序建构获取掌控感的一种情绪释放机制。“夯”与“拉”的语境反义现象,生动地展示了语言在交际需求驱动下旺盛的自我更新能力,也为我们考察传统汉字在数字时代的语义重构与语用功能转换提供了一个鲜活的样本。
Abstract: In the hierarchical evaluation system prevalent in online discourse, the two Chinese characters hāng and lā, which originally bore no semantic relation, are temporarily conflated into a pair of contextual antonyms under the coercion of the online construction “cóng hāng dào lā” (from hāng to lā), assuming the evaluative functions of “excellent” and “terrible” respectively. This paper traces the semantic ascent of hāng from a colloquial character recorded in the Ming-dynasty lexicon Zihui, through its use in northern dialects to denote “stupid/clumsy,” to its phonetic borrowing of the Southern Min dialectal word giâ and subsequent grammaticalization into a stative adjective meaning “popular/trending.”Concurrently, it examines the semantic descent of lā from a verb meaning “to break/destroy” in the Shuowen Jiezi, through its extension to “to drag/pull” in Ming-Qing vernacular fiction, to its truncation of the Northeastern dialectal word lākuǎ and inheritance of its negative semantic prosody. On this basis, drawing upon the Principle of Economy and sociopragmatic perspectives, the paper argues that this phenomenon represents a pragmatic strategy employed by contemporary youth in the age of information overload—namely, leveraging minimal linguistic signs to achieve cognitive reduction, efficient communication, and group identity recognition. It also serves as an emotional release mechanism through which individuals seek a sense of control by constructing symbolic hierarchies in an increasingly uncertain social reality. The contextual antonymy of hāng and lā vividly demonstrates the robust self-renewing capacity of language driven by communicative needs, and provides a vivid sample for examining the semantic reconstruction and pragmatic functional shift of traditional Chinese characters in the digital age.
文章引用:张润敏. 网络层级评价中的词汇重构——“夯”与“拉”语境反义现象探析[J]. 现代语言学, 2026, 14(9): 264-269. https://doi.org/10.12677/ml.2026.149922

参考文献

[1] Goldberg, A.E. (1995) Constructions: A Construction Grammar Approach to Argument Structure. University of Chicago Press, 265.
[2] [明]梅膺祚. 字汇[M]. 明万历四十三年(1615年)刊本.
[3] 王志平. “工”字补释——兼论“夯” “扛”的历史演变(下) [J]. 文献语言学, 2025(1): 149-160+267.
[4] 田源. 网络流行语中方言成分的生态语言学观照[J]. 长江学术, 2017(4): 90-95.
[5] 梁鑫渊. 网络极简热词折射文字失语症[EB/OL]. 中国社会科学网.
https://www.cssn.cn/skgz/bwyc/202604/t20260402_5979105.shtml, 2026-04-02.
[6] 理查德∙道金斯. 自私的基因[M]. 卢允中, 张岱云, 陈复加, 罗小舟, 译. 北京: 中信出版社, 2012: 215-227.
[7] 李彪. 中国网络流行语演化20年: 机理、规律与转向[J]. 西安交通大学学报(社会科学版), 2025(1): 106-115.
[8] [东汉]许慎. 说文解字[M]. [宋]徐铉, 校定. 北京: 中华书局, 1963.
[9] [西晋]陈寿. 三国志[M]. [南朝宋]裴松之, 注. 北京: 中华书局, 1959.
[10] 黄午宵. 浅析网络热词“拉胯” [J]. 汉字文化, 2023(S1): 29-31.