老龄化背景下失能老人长期照护保障的政策供给与优化路径——基于21个省市政策文本的量化分析
A Study on the Optimization of Long-Term Care Insurance Policies from the Perspective of Care Needs of the Elderly—A Quantitative Analysis Based on Policy Texts from 21 Provinces and Municipalities
摘要: 在人口老龄化加速推进的背景下,长期护理保险承载着为失能老年群体构筑基本照护安全网的核心使命。本文从老年照护需求与政策供给匹配的视角出发,以2016~2025年全国21个省市的长护险专项政策文本为样本,采用内容分析法与文本量化分析法,系统考察供给型、需求型与环境型三类政策工具在不同层次照护需求上的配置特征与匹配状况。研究发现:当前长护险政策呈现“强供给、弱需求”的总体格局,供给型工具占比44.2%,高度集中于基础生存型照护需求,而在回应家庭支持型与社会参与型需求方面力度不足;需求型工具整体薄弱,服务便捷化与社会力量激励尤为欠缺;环境型工具内部“重规制、轻协同”特征明显,多元主体协作机制与社会宣传引导严重不足;东部与西部地区在工具选择偏好上存在显著差异,西部地区更依赖供给型与环境型工具。针对上述结构性问题,本文提出强化需求侧激励、构建整合型照护体系、聚焦农村与低收入老年群体、推动智慧护理创新等优化路径,以期为提升长护险制度对老年失能群体的保障效能提供参考。
Abstract: Against the backdrop of accelerating population aging, long-term care insurance bears the core mission of building a basic care safety net for disabled older adults. From the perspective of matching elderly care needs with policy supply, this study takes 21 specialized LTCI policy documents from provinces and cities across China during 2016~2025 as samples, employing content analysis and quantitative text analysis to systematically examine the allocation characteristics and matching conditions of supply-oriented, demand-oriented, and environment-oriented policy instruments across different levels of care needs. The findings reveal that the current LTCI policy framework exhibits an overall pattern of “strong supply, weak demand”: supply-oriented instruments account for 44.2%, highly concentrated on basic survival care needs, while responses to family support and social participation needs remain insufficient; demand-oriented instruments are generally weak, with service accessibility measures and social force incentives particularly lacking; environment-oriented instruments show a clear tendency of “emphasizing regulation while neglecting coordination”, with multi-stakeholder collaboration mechanisms and public awareness campaigns significantly underdeveloped; notable regional differences exist between eastern and western regions in instrument selection preferences, with western regions relying more heavily on supply- and environment-oriented instruments. To address these structural issues, this study proposes optimization pathways including strengthening demand-side incentives, building an integrated care system, focusing on rural and low-income elderly groups, and promoting smart nursing innovations, aiming to provide references for enhancing the effectiveness of LTCI in safeguarding disabled older adults.
文章引用:王微, 唐蓉. 老龄化背景下失能老人长期照护保障的政策供给与优化路径——基于21个省市政策文本的量化分析[J]. 老龄化研究, 2026, 13(9): 46-53. https://doi.org/10.12677/ar.2026.139624

参考文献

[1] Chen, X., Hu, X. and Jiang, Y. (2015) Predicting the Prevalence of Disability in Older Americans Using a Markov Model. Population Health Metrics, 13, 1-12.
[2] Han, X., Wang, H. and Du, X. (2024) The Impact of Long‐Term Care Insurance on the Utilization of Inpatient Service: Evidence and Mechanisms in China. Health Economics, 33, 2778-2797.
https://doi.org/10.1002/hec.4896
[3] 赵一凡, 关博. 推动长期护理保险制度成熟定型的改革建议[J]. 卫生经济研究, 2024, 41(12): 46-49.
[4] 汤薇, 王超群. 长期护理保险筹资精算模型及应用——基于动态收支平衡视角[J]. 保险研究, 2022(3): 76-91.
[5] Yu, X. (2025) Joint Lives: Health Dependence, Long-Term Care Insurance Pricing and Lifecycle Strategies for Retired Couples. UNSW Sydney.
[6] 卢智增, 靳天瑞. 政策工具视角下我国大学生志愿服务西部计划政策发展研究——基于2003-2024年50份政策文本的量化分析[J]. 中国大学生就业, 2025(7): 28-38.
[7] Rothwell, R. and Zegveld, W. (1985) Reindustrialisation and Technology. Longman.
[8] 戴卫东. 中国长期护理保险制度构建研究[M]. 北京: 人民出版社, 2012.
[9] Rothwell, R. and Zegveld, W. (1985) Reindustrialisation and Technology. Longman.
[10] 季佳林, 刘远立, 仲崇明, 等. 荷兰长期护理保险制度改革对中国的启示[J]. 中国卫生政策研究, 2020, 13(8): 43-49.
[11] 周晓蒙. 老年人长期照护与劳动力需求研究[D]: [博士学位论文]. 大连: 东北财经大学, 2018.
[12] 肖颖, 朱勤, 王雪辉. 长期护理保险的再分配与社会投资功能: 来自德日韩的经验与启示[J]. 中国卫生政策研究, 2023, 16(7): 23-30.
[13] 林玲. 长期护理保险对中老年人子代经济支持的影响研究[J]. 卫生软科学, 2025, 39(8): 32-38.
[14] 姜腊. 河南省长期护理保险试点及制度优化研究[J]. 卫生经济研究, 2025, 42(8): 45-48.