从“承诺”到“财产”视角论碳信用财产权的创设与构造
From the Perspective of “Commitment” to “Property” to Discuss the Creation and Construction of Carbon Credit Property Rights
摘要: 2024年全国温室气体自愿减排交易市场启动后,碳信用交易、质押、清缴等实践日益活跃,但其法律属性悬而未决。本文证成碳信用构成民法上无形财产权,并揭示其独特构造。碳信用并非对已完成减排事实的简单登记,而是项目业主面向未来计入期持续维持减排水平并承担逆转风险之信用承诺的国家法律确认。基于注册登记系统的设权效力,碳信用具备可特定化、可支配、独立经济价值等客体特征,应纳入无形财产范畴。其权能宜采法律控制权、流转权与抵消权的功能性三权能构造,以替代传统四权能体系的机械套用。其特殊性根植于承诺本质,表现为公法与私法深度嵌合及强监管下的受限财产权形态。登记公信力与风险分担技术维持碳信用权利的稳定性。将碳信用纳入财产权体系予以教义学分析,既为无形财产权类型化提供新样本,也为碳市场交易、担保融资、破产隔离等私法制度奠定权利基础。
Abstract: After the launch of the national greenhouse gas voluntary emission reduction trading market in 2024, practices such as carbon credit trading, pledge, and clearing have become increasingly active, but their legal attributes remain unresolved. This paper proves that carbon credit constitutes intangible property rights in civil law and reveals its unique structure. Carbon credit is not a simple registration of the completed emission reduction facts, but a national legal confirmation of the credit commitment of the project owner to maintain the emission reduction level and bear the risk of reversal in the future credit period. Based on the effectiveness of the registration system, carbon credit has the object characteristics of being specific, disposable, and independent economic value, and should be included in the category of intangible property. Its power should adopt the functional three-power structure of legal control right, circulation right and offset right to replace the mechanical application of the traditional four-power system. Its particularity is rooted in the nature of commitment, which is manifested in the deep integration of public law and private law and the form of restricted property rights under strong supervision. Registration credibility and risk sharing technology maintain the stability of carbon credit rights. Incorporating carbon credit into the property rights system for doctrinal analysis not only provides a new sample for the classification of intangible property rights, but also lays the foundation for private law systems such as carbon market transactions, secured financing, and bankruptcy isolation.
参考文献
|
[1]
|
2025年全国温室气体自愿减排交易市场运行情况一览[EB/OL]. 2025-12-31. https://www.ccer.com.cn/wcm/ccer/html/2408scdt1/20260101/090126227.shtml, 2026-07-13.
|
|
[2]
|
温室气体自愿减排交易管理办法(试行) [EB/OL]. 2023-10-19. https://www.mee.gov.cn/xxgk2018/xxgk/xxgk02/202310/t20231020_1043694.html, 2026-07-13.
|
|
[3]
|
科尔. 污染与财产权: 环境保护的所有权制度比较研究[M]. 北京: 北京大学出版社, 2009.
|
|
[4]
|
潘晓滨. 碳信用法律属性界定及其对自愿减排市场司法保障的启示[J]. 当代法学, 2024, 38(2): 112-122.
|
|
[5]
|
涂永前. 碳金融的法律再造[J]. 中国社会科学, 2012(3): 95-113+207.
|
|
[6]
|
陈娟丽. 林业碳汇核证减排量所有权归属的实践样态与应然思路[J]. 干旱区资源与环境, 2021, 35(4): 1-9.
|
|
[7]
|
陆霁. 中国林业碳汇产权研究[M]. 北京: 中国林业出版社, 2017.
|
|
[8]
|
European Parliament and Council of the European Union (2026) Directive 2014/65/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 May 2014 on Markets in Financial Instruments and Amending Directive 2002/92/EC and Directive 2011/61/EU (MiFID II). https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A32014L0065
|
|
[9]
|
Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative (RGGI) (2026) Compliance. https://www.rggi.org/node/106
|
|
[10]
|
武曙红, 张小全. CDM林业碳汇项目的非持久性风险分析[J]. 林业科学, 2007(8): 123-126.
|
|
[11]
|
森林是如何“存碳”的? [EB/OL]. 2026-01-05. https://www.forestry.gov.cn/c/www/zhzs/655020.jhtml, 2026-07-13.
|
|
[12]
|
郭兰潇. 论碳信用作为一种新型权利[J]. 征信, 2026, 44(5): 23-34.
|
|
[13]
|
张金昌. 现代企业财务分析[M]. 北京: 经济管理出版社, 1997.
|
|
[14]
|
徐海燕, 李莉. 论碳排放权设质依据及立法建议[J]. 北方法学, 2014, 8(1): 16-22.
|
|
[15]
|
张叶东. 《生态环境法典》实施视角下碳排放权的解释构造[J/OL]. 深圳社会科学, 1-19. https://doi.org/10.20183/j.cnki.szshkx.20260618.002, 2026-07-13.
|
|
[16]
|
王少祥. 论网络虚拟财产的权利属性[J]. 新东方, 2019(5): 49-55.
|
|
[17]
|
曾彩琳. 林业碳汇权的法律属性及规范完善[J]. 中国人口·资源与环境, 2024, 34(7): 58-65.
|