目的论视角下剑门古蜀道文化负载词英译研究
A Skopos-Theoretic Study of the English Translation of Culture-Loaded Words in Jianmen Ancient Shu Road Culture
DOI: 10.12677/ml.2026.149932, PDF,   
作者: 陈佑轩:四川大学外国语学院,四川 成都
关键词: 目的论剑门古蜀道文化负载词Skopos Theory Jianmen Ancient Shu Road Culture-Loaded Words
摘要: 本文以德国功能派翻译理论中的“目的论”(Skopos Theory)为理论框架,研究了剑门古蜀道文化中特有的“文化负载词”的英译问题。文章首先将这些词汇根据其文化内涵分为地理、历史、文学和典故四类,然后通过具体案例分析了不同类型词汇在翻译过程中所采用的策略,如音译、意译、增译和解释性翻译等。研究发现,剑门古蜀道文化负载词的翻译并非简单的语言转换,而是一个受翻译目的、文本功能和目标读者需求驱动的文化调适过程。译者在翻译过程中,需在“保留源语文化特色”与“确保目标读者理解”之间寻求平衡。文章认为,目的论为地方文化遗产的外译策略选择提供了有效的理论解释。
Abstract: This paper takes Skopos Theory, a core concept of the German functionalist translation theory, as its theoretical framework to investigate the English translation of culture-loaded words specific to the Jianmen Ancient Shu Road culture. The study first categorizes these expressions into four types based on their cultural connotations: geographical, historical, literary, and allusion-based. Through detailed case analyses, it examines the translation strategies employed for different types of these expressions, including transliteration, free translation, amplification, and explanatory translation. The findings reveal that the translation of culture-loaded words in the context of the Jianmen Ancient Shu Road is not a mere linguistic conversion, but rather a process of cultural adaptation driven by translation purposes, textual functions, and target readers’ expectations. Translators are required to strike a balance between “preserving the distinctive features of the source culture” and “ensuring comprehension among the target audience.” The paper argues that Skopos Theory provides an effective theoretical framework for explaining the translation strategy choices in the external communication of local cultural heritage.
文章引用:陈佑轩. 目的论视角下剑门古蜀道文化负载词英译研究[J]. 现代语言学, 2026, 14(9): 348-356. https://doi.org/10.12677/ml.2026.149932

参考文献

[1] Nida, E. (1945) Linguistics and Ethnology in Translation-Problems. Word, 1, 194-208.
https://doi.org/10.1080/00437956.1945.11659254
[2] Bassnett, S. (2002) Translation Studies. 3rd Edition, Routledge.
[3] Kelly, D. (2000) Text Selection for Developing Translator Competence: Why Texts from the Tourist Sector Constitute Suitable Material. In: Schäffner, C. and Adab, B., Eds., Developing Translation Competence, John Benjamins, 157-170.
https://doi.org/10.1075/btl.38.15kel
[4] 张健. 外宣翻译导论[M]. 北京: 国防工业出版社, 2013.
[5] 赵丽丽, 王文雅. 目的论指导下的非物质文化遗产翻译实践——以山西省民俗文化的英文翻译为例[J]. 西部学刊, 2020(15): 123-125.
[6] 韦玉雪, 高芳. 目的论视角下江西农业文化遗产的外宣翻译[J]. 农村经济与科技, 2024, 35(21): 61-65.
[7] 陆志国. 非物质文化遗产介绍性文本的英译研究[J]. 外国语文, 2017, 33(2): 117-121.
[8] 胡庚申. 生态翻译学: 建构与诠释[M]. 北京: 商务印书馆, 2013.
[9] Vermeer, H.J. (2000) Skopos and Commission in Translational Action. In: Venuti, L., Ed., The Translation Studies Reader, Routledge, 221-232.
[10] 谭其骧. 中国历史地图集[M]. 北京: 中国地图出版社, 1982.
[11] 刘连安. 中国专名应用的困境与现代专名学研究[J]. 中国科技术语, 2013, 15(5): 40-43.
[12] 刘宓庆. 翻译美学导论[M]. 北京: 中国对外翻译出版公司, 2005.
[13] 许渊冲. 文学与翻译[M]. 北京: 北京大学出版社, 2003.
[14] 贾和普(Hope Justman). 剑门古蜀道行走记[M]. 邱婷婷, 译. 成都: 四川民族出版社, 2024.