从知识到创新:信息控制类课程“学–思–创”教学改革研究
From Knowledge to Innovation: The “Learning-Thinking-Creating” Teaching Reform for Information and Control Courses
摘要: 信息控制类课程兼具理论性、综合性与实践性,是衔接专业知识学习与创新能力培养的重要载体。针对课程教学重理论轻应用、教学体系呈“知识点–章节–考试”线性结构、创新创业教育割裂于主教学等问题,构建“学–思–创”三维协同育人模型。模型以应用创新型人才培养为目标,以知识链、能力链、项目链为三条主线,通过“学”夯实基础、“思”深化理解、“创”实践产出,将“课程–项目–成果”组织为相互衔接的闭环,并依托三级任务、贯通式项目与“课程–项目–竞赛–成果”一体化链条保障实施,旨在为信息控制类课程由知识传授向知识迁移与创新实践贯通转型提供可操作的教学设计。
Abstract: Information and control courses are characterized by theoretical depth, interdisciplinary integration, and practical orientation, serving as an essential bridge between professional knowledge acquisition and the cultivation of innovative capabilities. To address problems such as an overemphasis on theory at the expense of application, a linear teaching structure organized around “knowledge points-chapters-examinations,” and the separation of innovation and entrepreneurship education from the core curriculum, this study develops a three-dimensional collaborative education model of “Learning-Thinking-Creating.” Aimed at cultivating application-oriented innovative talent, the model is structured around three main threads: the knowledge chain, competency chain, and project chain. It consolidates foundations through “Learning,” deepens understanding through “Thinking,” and fosters tangible outcomes through “Creating.” By organizing “courses-projects-outcomes” into an interconnected closed loop and supporting implementation through three-tiered tasks, integrated projects spanning the entire learning process, and a unified “course-project-competition-outcome” pathway, the model provides an actionable instructional design for transforming information and control courses from knowledge transmission into an integrated process of transfer of learning and innovative practice.
参考文献
|
[1]
|
刘立, 胡德鑫, 孙雨晗. 我国新工科建设的成效、挑战与未来进路——基于第二批新工科研究与实践项目的分析[J]. 清华大学教育研究, 2025, 46(3): 119-128.
|
|
[2]
|
王洪才. 创新创业教育: 高校适应新质生产力发展的根本选择[J]. 江苏高教, 2024(8): 25-33.
|
|
[3]
|
杜启霞, 高锦飚, 祖强, 宋宝香. 从“背离”到“融合”: 专创融合共同体的逻辑起点、内在机理与建设路径[J]. 江苏高教, 2024(2): 60-64.
|
|
[4]
|
刘文杰. 高校“专创融合”何以可能——基于二者本质特点与关系的分析[J]. 复旦教育论坛, 2022, 20(4): 67-73.
|
|
[5]
|
李正, 梁思燕, 焦磊. 国外工程教育项目式课程体系的形成机理研究[J]. 高等工程教育研究, 2024(6): 161-169, 186.
|
|
[6]
|
曲虹霞, 谢慧芳, 丁杰, 等. “学-用-思-创”进阶式案例教学的探索与实践——以《化学反应工程分析》为例[J]. 教育进展, 2025, 15(4): 1112-1116.
|
|
[7]
|
林健. 国家卓越工程师学院建设: 培养造就国家重大战略急需的卓越工程师[J]. 清华大学教育研究, 2023, 44(3): 1-10.
|
|
[8]
|
Chen, J., Kolmos, A. and Du, X. (2021) Forms of Implementation and Challenges of PBL in Engineering Education: A Review of Literature. European Journal of Engineering Education, 46, 90-115. https://doi.org/10.1080/03043797.2020.1718615
|
|
[9]
|
Crawley, E.F., Malmqvist, J., Östlund, S., et al. (2014) Rethinking Engineering Education: The CDIO Approach. 2nd Edition, Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-05561-9
|
|
[10]
|
Spady, W.G. (1994) Outcome-Based Education: Critical Issues and Answers. American Association of School Administrators.
|
|
[11]
|
何克抗. 建构主义——革新传统教学的理论基础(上) [J]. 电化教育研究, 1997(3): 3-9.
|
|
[12]
|
Anderson, L.W. and Krathwohl, D.R. (2001) A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching, and Assessing: A Revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy of Educational Objectives. Longman.
|
|
[13]
|
Morris, T.H. (2020) Experiential Learning—A Systematic Review and Revision of Kolb’s Model. Interactive Learning Environments, 28, 1064-1077. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2019.1570279
|