经济分配中公平因素的心理学研究现状评述
A Review on Research of Fairness Concerns in Economic Distribution
摘要: 经济学中的经典的理性人假设认为，人都希望以尽可能少的付出，获得最大限度的收获。然而行为经济学中经典的最后通牒博弈、独裁者博弈等实验的结果显示了人们在经济分配中不一定都服从理性人假设，作出了非“理性”的选择，他们似乎厌恶不公平的分配，甚至宁愿牺牲自己的利益惩罚不公平的行为。本文主要介绍了行为实验和神经科学实验中使用的最后通牒博弈、独裁者博弈及其主要结果。
Abstract: The hypothesis of rational economic man in classical economics assumes that people always want to maximize their gains and minimize their losses. However, the behavioral results of classical paradigms in behavioral economics like Ultimatum Game and Dictator Game have suggested that people's behaviors in economic distribution are not in line with the rational assumption, and they are likely to make irrational choices. People tend to avoid unfairness in distribution, and even pu-nish unfairness proposers at the cost of their benefits. The present paper reviews the use of Ulti-matum Game and Dictator Game in the psychology and neuroscience studies and relevant results.
文章引用：曹智鹏 (2015). 经济分配中公平因素的心理学研究现状评述. 心理学进展, 5(4), 216-220. http://dx.doi.org/10.12677/AP.2015.54030

参考文献

[1] Boksem, M. A., & De Cremer, D. (2010). Fairness concerns predict medial frontal negativity amplitude in ultimatum bar-gaining. Social Neuroscience, 5, 118-128.
[2] Brune, M., Scheele, D., Heinisch, C., Tas, C., Wischniewski, J., & Gun-turkun, O. (2012). Empathy moderates the effect of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation of the right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex on costly punishment. PLoS ONE, 7, e44747.
[3] de Haan, M., & Thomas, K. M. (2002). Applications of ERP and fMRI techniques to developmental science. Developmental Science, 5, 335-343.
[4] De Neys, W., Novitskiy, N., Geeraerts, L., Ramautar, J., & Wagemans, J. (2011). Cognitive control and individual differences in economic ultimatum decision-making. PLoS ONE, 6, e27107.
[5] Declerck, C. H., Kiyonari, T., & Boone, C. (2009). Why do responders reject unequal offers in the ultimatum game? An experimental study on the role of perceiving interdependence. Journal of Economic Psychology, 30, 335-343.
[6] Eckel, C. C., & Grossman, P. J. (1996). Altruism in anonymous dictator games. Games and Economic Behavior, 16, 181- 191.
[7] Fehr, E., & Schmidt, K. M. (1999). A theory of fairness, competition, and cooperation. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 114, 817-868.
[8] Forsythe, R., Horowitz, J. L., Savin, N. E., & Sefton, M. (1994). Fairness in simple bargaining experiments. Games and Economic Behavior, 6, 347-369.
[9] Güth, W., Schmittberger, R., & Schwarze, B. (1982). An experimental analysis of ultimatum bargaining. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 3, 367-388.
[10] Henrich, J., Boyd, R., Bowles, S., Camerer, C., Fehr, E., Gintis, H., & Tracer, D. (2005). “Economic man” in cross-cultural perspective: Behavioral experiments in 15 small-scale societies. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 28, 795-855.
[11] Hsu, M., Anen, C., & Quartz, S. R. (2008). The right and the good: Distributive justice and neural encoding of equity and efficiency. Science, 320, 1092-1095.
[12] Knoch, D., Pascual-Leone, A., Meyer, K., Treyer, V., & Fehr, E. (2006). Diminishing reciprocal fairness by disrupting the right prefrontal cortex. Science, 314, 829-832.
[13] McCabe, K. A. (2008). Neuroeconomics and the Economic Sciences. Economics and Philosophy, 24, 345-368.
[14] Servátka, M. (2010). Does generosity generate generosity? An experimental study of reputation effects in a dictator game. The Journal of Socio-Economics, 39, 11-17.
[15] Shupp, R., Schmitt, P., & Swope, K. (2006). On the role of the hostage in ultimatum bargaining games. The Journal of Socio-Economics, 35, 399-411.
[16] Straub, P. G., & Murnighan, J. K. (1995). An experimental investigation of ultimatum games: Information, fairness, expectations, and lowest acceptable offers. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 27, 345-364.
[17] Tabibnia, G., Satpute, A. B., & Lieberman, M. D. (2008). The sunny side of fairness—Preference for fairness activates reward circuitry (and disregarding unfairness activates self-control circuitry). Psychological Science, 19, 339-347.
[18] Tan, H. B., & Forgas, J. P. (2010). When happiness makes us selfish, but sadness makes us fair: Affective influences on interpersonal strategies in the dictator game. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46, 571-576.
[19] Wu, Y., Hu, J., van Dijk, E., Leliveld, M. C., & Zhou, X. (2012). Brain activity in fairness consideration during asset distribution: Does the initial ownership play a role? PLoS ONE, 7, e39627.
[20] Wu, Y., Leliveld, M. C., & Zhou, X. (2011). Social distance modulates recipient’s fairness consideration in the dictator game: An ERP study. Biological Psychology, 88, 253-262.
[21] Wu, Y., Zhou, Y., van Dijk, E., Leliveld, M. C., & Zhou, X. (2011). Social comparison affects brain responses to fairness in asset division: An ERP study with the ultimatum game. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 5, 131.