层次分析法在绩效评价指标权重赋值中的应用
Application of Analytic Hierarchy Process in Index Weight Assignment for Performance Evaluation
摘要: 指标权重科学赋值是构建绩效评价体系的核心,直接决定评价结果的客观公正性。层次分析法(Analytic Hierarchy Process, AHP)融合定性判断与定量运算,能够弥补传统赋权方法主观随意性突出的缺陷,是多指标综合评价主流工具之一。文章通过梳理AHP理论逻辑与标准化赋权流程,总结了其在企事业单位、公共治理领域的应用模式,并剖析了该方法在实践中面临的主观判断冲突、矩阵一致性不足、静态模型与动态环境脱节及操作性障碍等现实难题。在此基础上,从标度优化、组合赋权、动态机制、智能工具四个维度提出改进思路,以期为相关领域绩效体系搭建提供方法参考。
Abstract: Scientific assignment of index weights is the core of constructing a performance evaluation system, directly determining the objectivity and fairness of evaluation results. The Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) integrates qualitative judgment with quantitative calculation. It can compensate for the prominent defect of excessive subjectivity in traditional weight assignment methods and serves as a mainstream tool for multi-index comprehensive evaluation. This paper clarifies the theoretical logic and standardized weight‑assignment procedure of AHP, summarizes its application modes in enterprises, public institutions, and public governance, and analyzes practical drawbacks of this method, including subjective judgment conflicts, insufficient matrix consistency, disconnection between static models and dynamic environments, and operational barriers. Improvement ideas are proposed from four dimensions: scale optimization, combined weighting, dynamic mechanisms, and intelligent tools, so as to provide methodological reference for the construction of performance systems in relevant fields.
参考文献
|
[1]
|
翁金香, 王浩名, 林传青, 等. 层次分析法在企业考评体系中的应用与优化[J]. 商业文化, 2025(23): 109-111.
|
|
[2]
|
唐林. 一种解决复杂系统决策的方法——层次分析法[J]. 广西大学梧州分校学报, 1997(1): 60-62.
|
|
[3]
|
杨少梅. 层次分析法在员工绩效评价中的应用[J]. 华北电力大学学报, 2006, 33(4): 96-98.
|
|
[4]
|
翟国栋, 张书勇, 马建斌. 基于层次分析-模糊综合模型的国有企业大监督绩效评价研究[J]. 中小企业管理与科技, 2025(14): 98-101.
|
|
[5]
|
尹越, 廖磊. 基于BSC和AHP的高校学生资助专项资金绩效评价指标体系构建[J]. 西部经济管理论坛, 2022, 33(4): 81-88.
|
|
[6]
|
杜龙波, 王湿杰, 王晓晨, 等. 基于AHP-模糊综合评价法的政府引导基金绩效评价研究[J]. 科技管理研究, 2024, 44(1): 33-41.
|
|
[7]
|
李志刚, 汤书昆. 用层次分析法改进的平衡计分卡及其应用[J]. 价值工程, 2004, 23(10): 52-54.
|
|
[8]
|
马燕, 郭惠芬, 范文翔, 等. 基于AHP-熵值法的硕士研究生科研绩效评价研究[J]. 黑龙江高教研究, 2022, 40(8): 97-103.
|
|
[9]
|
何玮, 王霞. 基于OKR-AHP方法的价值创造影响因素分析——以Z公司基层经营单元目标与关键成果指标体系为例[J]. 现代商业, 2025(13): 108-111.
|
|
[10]
|
郭亚军. 一种新的动态综合评价方法[J]. 管理科学学报, 2002, 5(2): 49-54.
|