多智能体协同技术在钻井参数动态优化与井下风险预警中的应用研究
Application Research of Multi-Agent Collaborative Technology in Dynamic Drilling Parameter Optimization and Downhole Risk Early Warning
DOI: 10.12677/jogt.2026.483053, PDF,   
作者: 周德岐:中法渤海地质服务有限公司湛江分公司,广东 湛江;赵光宇:中法渤海地质服务有限公司海南分公司,海南 海口;朱茂勋, 李皇艺*, 梁馨文:武汉时代地智科技股份有限公司,湖北 武汉
关键词: 智能钻井多智能体系统参数动态优化井下风险预警协同调控Intelligent Drilling Multi-Agent System Dynamic Parameter Optimization Downhole Risk Early Warning Collaborative Regulation
摘要: 深层及非常规油气钻井中,参数优化与风险预警的传统串行处理模式存在优化过程不受安全约束、预警结果难以反控参数调整的结构性缺陷。本文引入多智能体协同技术,构建了适配钻井现场的五层协同架构,提出风险约束型参数动态优化策略,并建立井下多风险耦合预警与参数调控双向闭环机制。在此基础上,系统分析了多智能体相对于传统机器学习与数字孪生技术的定位与优势,从泛化能力、实时性、多任务协同、可解释性及工程落地性五个维度进行了对比分析。分析表明,多智能体协同技术可实现钻井参数动态优化与井下风险预警的双向联动,为破解提速与安全之间的动态平衡难题提供了可行架构。当前主要技术瓶颈在于井下数据传输实时性不足、高质量标注样本稀缺及边缘端算力受限。结合现场需求,提出了机理–数据融合驱动、大模型工具增强及数字孪生虚实联动等重点发展方向。
Abstract: In deep and unconventional oil and gas drilling, the conventional serial processing mode of parameter optimization and risk early warning has a structural defect that the optimization process is not constrained by safety thresholds and the warning results can hardly feed back to adjust drilling parameters in real time. To address this issue, this paper introduces multi-agent collaborative technology and constructs a five-layer collaborative architecture suitable for field drilling operations. A risk-constrained dynamic parameter optimization strategy is proposed, and a bidirectional closed-loop mechanism for coupled multi-risk early warning and parameter regulation is established. On this basis, the positioning and advantages of multi-agent systems relative to traditional machine learning and digital twin technologies are systematically analyzed, and a comparative analysis among the three approaches is conducted from five dimensions: generalization ability, real-time performance, multi-task collaboration, interpretability and engineering deployability. The analysis shows that multi-agent collaborative technology can realize the bidirectional linkage between dynamic parameter optimization and downhole risk early warning, providing a feasible architecture to resolve the dynamic trade-off between drilling acceleration and downhole safety. Current technical bottlenecks mainly lie in insufficient real-time data transmission, scarcity of high-quality labeled samples and limited edge-side computing power. Combined with field application requirements, future development directions including mechanism-data hybrid driving, large-model enhanced agents and digital twin-based virtual-real collaboration are proposed.
文章引用:周德岐, 赵光宇, 朱茂勋, 李皇艺, 梁馨文. 多智能体协同技术在钻井参数动态优化与井下风险预警中的应用研究[J]. 石油天然气学报, 2026, 48(3): 489-499. https://doi.org/10.12677/jogt.2026.483053

参考文献

[1] 成海, 张逸群, 王印, 等. 超深定向井地质工程力学耦合机理研究进展与认识[J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2024, 14(4): 593-599+646.
[2] 孙宝江, 周梓强, 孙骞. 油气钻采工程中的人工智能方法研究进展[J]. 石油学报, 2025, 46(11): 2141-2173.
[3] 曾义金, 王敏生, 光新军, 等. 中国石化智能钻井技术进展与展望[J]. 石油钻探技术, 2024, 52(5): 1-9.
[4] 李昌盛, 张乐, 孙华凯, 等. 基于云边协同的钻井智能分析决策系统[J]. 石油钻探技术, 2026, 54(3): 9-19.
[5] Barbosa, L.F.F.M., Nascimento, A., Mathias, M.H. and de Carvalho, J.A. (2019) Machine Learning Methods Applied to Drilling Rate of Penetration Prediction and Optimization—A Review. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 183, Article 106332.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2019.106332
[6] 王钧泽, 李黔, 尹虎. 基于数字孪生技术的钻井复杂风险智能预警系统架构[J]. 石油钻探技术, 2024, 52(5): 154-162.
[7] 李臻, 宋先知, 李根生, 等. 基于双输入序列到序列模型的井眼轨迹实时智能预测方法[J]. 石油钻采工艺, 2023, 45(4): 393-403.
[8] 郭建明, 李云峰, 韩朝晖. 钻井异常状态实时监测与智能决策系统的研究[J]. 钻采工艺, 2008, 31(2): 32-35.
[9] de Wardt, J., Runia, J., Cayeux, E., et al. (2024) Taxonomy Describing Levels of Autonomous Drilling Systems. 2024 SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, New Orleans, 23-25 September 2024, SPE-217754-MS.
[10] 徐英卓. 基于MAS的远程钻井状态监测与事故诊断系统研究[J]. 计算机工程与应用, 2003, 39(22): 215-217.
[11] 武东升. 基于多智能体钻井故障诊断系统的研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 成都: 西南石油大学, 2015.
[12] 杨立全, 张方舟. 钻井井控虚拟仿真协作模式的研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 大庆: 东北石油大学, 2013.
[13] 西南石油大学. 基于多智能体协同的钻井操作辅助与故障分析方法及系统[P]. 中国专利, CN121561744B. 2026-04-21.