六枝方言的“到”和“起”
“Dao” and “Qi” in the Liuzhi Dialect
摘要: 六枝方言属西南官话,“到[tau43]”(上声)和“起”在六枝方言中均可作持续体标记,且常可互换。本文在前人研究基础上,考察二者在六枝方言中的语法功能及分布差异。发现:“到”“起”作谓语、补语时分工明确,并不混用;作持续体标记时虽多可互换,但在祈使句、连谓结构及特定句式中仍存在显著差异。这些差异主要与二者的词汇来源、动相意义类型及后续语法化路径有关。此外,“到”的功能扩展范围相对更广,进一步发展出句末语气功能,某些结构中的“到”还表现出独立语义进一步弱化,趋于成为无实义结构成分的现象。
Abstract: The Liuzhi dialect is a variety of Southwestern Mandarin. In Liuzhi, both “dao” [tau43] (Shang tone) and “qi” can function as durative aspect markers and are often interchangeable. Building on previous research, this study examines their grammatical functions and distributional differences in the dialect. The findings show that “dao” and “qi” have clearly differentiated functions and are not interchangeable when used as predicates or complements. Although they are interchangeable in many contexts when used as durative aspect markers, they still exhibit significant differences in imperatives, serial verb constructions, and certain specific constructions. These differences are mainly related to their lexical sources, the types of phasal meanings they express, and their subsequent grammaticalization pathways. In addition, “dao” has undergone broader functional extension and has further developed a sentence-final modal function. In some constructions, its independent meaning has become further weakened, and it tends to function as a structural element with little independent meaning.
参考文献
|
[1]
|
贵州省地方志编纂委员会. 贵州省志. 汉语方言志[M]. 北京: 方志出版社, 1998.
|
|
[2]
|
李蓝. 西南官话的分区(稿) [J]. 方言, 2009, 31(1): 72-87.
|
|
[3]
|
田懋勤. 四川话的“倒”和“起” [J]. 西南民族学院学报(哲学社会科学版), 1983(4): 37-40.
|
|
[4]
|
汪平. 贵阳方言的语法特点[J]. 语言研究, 1983(1): 109-124.
|
|
[5]
|
喻遂生. 重庆方言的“倒”和“起” [J]. 方言, 1990(3): 57-64.
|
|
[6]
|
李蓝. 贵州大方话中的“c到”和“起” [J]. 中国语文, 1998(2): 113-122.
|
|
[7]
|
李苑. 成都话的“倒”和“起” [J]. 现代语文(语言研究版), 2008(2): 81-82.
|
|
[8]
|
吴福祥. 南方方言虚词“到(倒)”的用法及其来源[J]. 中国语文研究, 2002(2): 28-46.
|
|
[9]
|
罗自群. 汉语方言读上声的持续标记“倒” [J]. 语言研究, 2006, 26(1): 30-36.
|
|
[10]
|
吴福祥. 南方方言几个状态补语标记的来源(一) [J]. 方言, 2001(4): 344-354.
|
|
[11]
|
蔡瑱. 类型学视野下汉语趋向范畴的跨方言比较——基于“起”组趋向词的专题研究[M]. 上海: 学林出版社, 2014.
|
|
[12]
|
夏俐萍. 跨方言视角下“X起”中“起”的语义扩展与扩展限制[J]. 语言学论丛, 2022(1): 243-265.
|
|
[13]
|
沈敏, 唐贤清. 湘桂边苗族汉话持续标记的来源及其类型学价值——兼论结果体、完结体的语法化双路径[J]. 语言科学, 2023, 22(6): 640-651.
|
|
[14]
|
吴福祥. 重谈“动 + 了 + 宾”格式的来源和完成体助词“了”的产生[J]. 中国语文, 1998(6): 452-462.
|
|
[15]
|
杨永龙. 从稳紧义形容词到持续体助词——试说“定” “稳定” “实” “牢” “稳” “紧”的语法化[J]. 中国语文, 2005(5): 408-417+479.
|