数智时代托育专业产教融合质量评价:理论逻辑与框架构建
Quality Evaluation of Industry-Education Integration in Childcare Programs in the Era of Digital Intelligence: Theoretical Logic and Framework Construction
DOI: 10.12677/ae.2026.1692003, PDF,    科研立项经费支持
作者: 谢文澜:宁波幼儿师范高等专科学校科研处,浙江 宁波;项春烨*:宁波大学教师教育学院,浙江 宁波;岑雨霏:宁波幼儿师范高等专科学校阳明人文学院,浙江 宁波;李甜甜:宁波幼儿师范高等专科学校鹤琴学前教育学院,浙江 宁波
关键词: 托育专业产教融合质量评价岗位胜任数智治理Childcare Programs Industry-Education Integration Quality Evaluation Occupational Competence Digital Governance
摘要: 随着托育服务高质量发展与教育数字化转型的推进,为厘清托育专业产教融合质量评价的对象边界,构建兼顾儿童福祉、岗位胜任与服务贡献的综合评价框架,本文整合产教融合评价、托育质量、工作本位学习、工作整合学习、胜任力和数字治理等领域的研究,区分托育机构质量、托育服务供给质量、托育人才培养质量与托育产教融合质量。研究认为,托育专业产教融合质量的评价对象是职业院校、托育机构及相关主体共同形成的跨组织协同育人系统,评价应坚持儿童本位与安全底线、多主体共责、全过程协同、实践机会公平、情境化胜任、多源证据互证和技术审慎应用。在此基础上,构建“治理基础–资源能力–协同过程–胜任成效–服务贡献”五维框架,并提出了支撑该框架落地的闭环运行与持续改进机制。数智技术应作为证据采集、过程记录和辅助分析的基础设施,遵循数据最小化、分级授权、人工复核、知情申诉和用途限制。该框架有助于推动托育专业产教融合评价由合作项目绩效考核转向协同育人质量治理。
Abstract: With the advancement of high-quality childcare service development and the digital transformation of education, this study aims to clarify the boundary of the evaluation object of industry-education integration quality in childcare programs and construct a comprehensive evaluation framework that incorporates child well-being, occupational competence, and service contribution. This study integrates research on industry-education integration evaluation, childcare quality, work-based learning, work-integrated learning, competency, and digital governance. It distinguishes among childcare institution quality, childcare service provision quality, childcare talent development quality, and industry-education integration quality in childcare programs. The study argues that the evaluation object of industry-education integration quality in childcare programs is a cross-organizational collaborative education system jointly formed by vocational institutions, childcare organizations, and related stakeholders. The evaluation should adhere to principles including child-centeredness and safety as the bottom line, shared responsibility among multiple stakeholders, whole-process collaboration, equity of practical opportunities, contextualized competence, triangulation of multi-source evidence, and prudent application of technology. Based on these principles, a five-dimensional framework of “governance foundation-resource capacity-collaborative process-competence outcomes-service contribution” is proposed, along with a closed-loop operation and continuous improvement mechanism to support its implementation. Digital technologies should serve as infrastructure for evidence collection, process documentation, and assisted analysis, while following the principles of data minimization, tiered authorization, human review, informed appeal, and purpose limitation. This framework contributes to shifting the evaluation of industry-education integration in childcare programs from performance assessment of collaborative projects toward quality governance of collaborative talent cultivation.
文章引用:谢文澜, 项春烨, 岑雨霏, 李甜甜. 数智时代托育专业产教融合质量评价:理论逻辑与框架构建[J]. 教育进展, 2026, 16(9): 1116-1126. https://doi.org/10.12677/ae.2026.1692003

参考文献

[1] 关于开展全国托育服务质量提升行动(2025-2027年)的通知[EB/OL]. 2025-05-16.
https://www.nhc.gov.cn/rkjcyjtfzs/c100148/202505/467849891c25424ebd1daf8096282a22.shtml, 2026-07-28.
[2] 关于加快推进普惠托育服务体系建设的意见[EB/OL]. 2025-07-08.
https://www.nhc.gov.cn/rkjcyjtfzs/c100148/202507/13ef8c0a6cbe4354850f95607888921c.shtml, 2026-07-28.
[3] 《数字中国建设2025年行动方案》近日印发[EB/OL]. 2025-05-16.
https://www.nda.gov.cn/sjj/ywpd/sjzg/0516/20250516160504500412691_pc.html, 2026-07-28.
[4] 关于印发《职业教育产教融合赋能提升行动实施方案(2023—2025年)》的通知[EB/OL]. 2023-06-13.
https://www.ndrc.gov.cn/xwdt/tzgg/202306/t20230613_1357506.html, 2026-07-28.
[5] 李盼道, 王金金. 基于人才培养供给侧与产业发展需求侧匹配性的产教融合政策研究[J]. 重庆交通大学学报(社会科学版), 2020, 20(4): 60-70.
[6] 徐国庆. 产教融合共同体: 走向校企关系的制度化建构[J]. 华东师范大学学报(教育科学版), 2025, 43(11): 1-12.
[7] 王璐. “岗课赛证”背景下高职托育专业人才培养模式研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 济南: 山东财经大学, 2025.
[8] 周蕾. 四川省0-3岁婴幼儿城镇托育机构安全评估指标体系的构建研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 成都: 成都中医药大学, 2019.
[9] 倪陶. 托育机构生活活动保育质量评价指标体系的构建研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 重庆: 西南大学, 2021.
[10] 金宝英. 0-3岁托育机构保育质量评估体系构建研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 哈尔滨: 哈尔滨师范大学, 2024.
[11] 聂秋月. 普惠性托育服务供给评估及实现路径研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 上海: 上海工程技术大学, 2023.
[12] 杨丹. 医育结合背景下婴幼儿托育服务与管理专业毕业生胜任力评价指标体系构建与应用研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 泸州: 西南医科大学, 2025.
[13] Billett, S. (2001) Learning through Work: Workplace Affordances and Individual Engagement. Journal of Workplace Learning, 13, 209-214.
https://doi.org/10.1108/eum0000000005548
[14] Billett, S. (2009) Realising the Educational Worth of Integrating Work Experiences in Higher Education. Studies in Higher Education, 34, 827-843.
https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070802706561
[15] Smith, C. (2012) Evaluating the Quality of Work-Integrated Learning Curricula: A Comprehensive Framework. Higher Education Research & Development, 31, 247-262.
https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2011.558072
[16] 缪学梅. 职业教育产教融合多元利益相关者协同有效性评价研究[J]. 顺德职业技术学院学报, 2021, 19(2): 42-50.
[17] 孙亚男, 陈民伟. 高校产教融合效果评价指标体系构建及实证研究[J]. 山东高等教育, 2022, 10(3): 17-23.
[18] 高慧, 赵蒙成. 利益相关者视阈下高职院校产教融合质量评价: 基于Nvivo的质性研究报告[J]. 职教论坛, 2018(8): 39-43.
[19] 张宏亮, 杨理连. 国外职业教育质量评价“第三方”参与状况对我国的启示——以美、英、德、澳四国为例[J]. 职教论坛, 2016(18): 86-92.
[20] 李冲. 美国高等职业教育第三方评估的外部质量保障体系的构建及启示[J]. 职业教育, 2022, 21(18): 47-54.
[21] 秦凤梅, 莫堃. 基于CIPP模型的职业教育产教融合质量评价研究[J]. 西南大学学报(社会科学版), 2022, 48(3): 194-203.
[22] 王慧霞. 基于CIPP模式的高职院校产教融合评价指标体系建构研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 广州: 广东技术师范大学, 2022.
[23] 姜泽许. 职业教育产教融合质量评价体系的构建[J]. 职教论坛, 2018(5): 34-39.
[24] 谢敏, 顾军燕. 产教融合视阈下高职院校校企融合度研究与评价实践[J]. 中国职业技术教育, 2018(5): 41-44.
[25] 刘志, 吴蓉. “托幼一体化”背景下高校托育专业人才培养的现状与对策[J]. 教育教学论坛, 2026(5): 51-54.
[26] 王慧, 王德云. “托幼一体化”背景下中职幼儿保育专业人才培养模式改革研究: 以奇台中等职业技术学校为例[J]. 教育科学论坛, 2026(12): 74-80.
[27] 孙思玉, 陈瀛. 数字化赋能职业教育高质量发展的实践与创新: 职业教育数字化转型发展论坛综述[J]. 中国职业技术教育, 2022(28): 46-51+44-45.
[28] 刘仁有. 转型与重塑: 数字化赋能职业教育新生态: 世界数字教育大会“职业教育数字化转型发展”论坛综述[J]. 中国职业技术教育, 2023(7): 12-17.
[29] 张地容, 冉洁婷. 数字赋能托育服务高质量发展的价值、挑战及实践路径[J]. 教育导刊, 2025(11): 23-30.
[30] 周春光, 周蒋浒, 王俊杰, 等. 高职教育产教融合绩效评价研究: 基于灰色聚类评估模型的分析[J]. 教育发展研究, 2021, 41(19): 70-76.
[31] 陈微. 基于大数据背景的高等职业教育产教融合质量评价体系建设研究: 以台州科技职业学院为例[J]. 中外企业文化, 2023(1): 214-216.
[32] 魏孔鹏, 谷洪彬. 基于数据挖掘的产教融合质量评价模型建构[J]. 数字技术与应用, 2020, 38(9): 206-208.
[33] WS/T 821-2023托育机构质量评估标准[S]. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2023.
[34] 教育部关于印发《幼儿园保育教育质量评估指南》的通知[EB/OL]. 2022-02-11.
http://www.moe.gov.cn/srcsite/A06/s3327/202202/t20220214_599198.html, 2026-07-28.
[35] 国务院办公厅关于深化产教融合的若干意见[EB/OL]. 2017-12-05.
https://www.gov.cn/gongbao/content/2018/content_5254308.htm, 2026-07-28.
[36] 北京市卫生健康委员会关于印发北京市托育机构质量评估标准(试行)的通知[EB/OL]. 2023-09-06.
https://wjw.beijing.gov.cn/zwgk_20040/qt/202309/t20230908_3254735.html, 2026-07-28.
[37] 广东将投3.86亿元建设示范托育机构 打造覆盖全省的普惠托育指导体系[EB/OL]. 2024-06-07.
https://czt.gd.gov.cn/tpzt/content/post_4437475.html, 2026-07-28.
[38] 市政府办公厅关于印发南京市加快推进普惠托育服务体系建设实施方案的通知[EB/OL]. 2024-08-28.
https://www.nanjing.gov.cn/zdgk/202408/t20240830_4754241.html, 2026-07-28.
[39] 浙江省卫生健康委员会 浙江省发展和改革委员会关于印发浙江省“十四五”托育服务发展规划的通知[EB/OL]. 2023-01-06.
https://wsjkw.zj.gov.cn/art/2023/1/6/art_1229123421_5050920.html, 2026-07-28.
[40] National Center on Child Care Quality Improvement (2013) QRIS Quality Standards Web Sites (No. 437). Office of Child Care, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
[41] National Association for the Education of Young Children (n.d.) Accreditation of Higher Education Programs.
https://www.naeyc.org/accreditation/higher-ed/accreditation
[42] U.S. Department of Labor (n.d.) Education.
https://www.apprenticeship.gov/apprenticeship-industries/education
[43] Department for Education (2026) Early Years Foundation Stage Statutory Framework.
https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/6a5f8e4fb00f3323bf1a23a1/EYFS_group_and_school_based_from_September_2026.pdf
[44] Ofsted (2026) Early Years Inspection: Guidance and Resources.
https://www.gov.uk/government/collections/early-years-inspection-guidance-and-resources
[45] Skills England (2025) Early Years Educator.
https://www.eyalliance.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/L3-Early-Years-Educator-Apprenticeship-Standard.pdf
[46] Ofqual and Institute for Apprenticeships and Technical Education (2026) End-Point Assessment Guide for Apprentices.
https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/end-point-assessment-guide-for-apprentices-2024/end-point-assessment-guide-for-apprentices
[47] Australian Children’s Education and Care Quality Authority (2026) National Quality Standard.
https://www.acecqa.gov.au/nqf/national-quality-standard
[48] Australian Children’s Education and Care Quality Authority (2026) Quality Improvement Plan.
https://www.acecqa.gov.au/assessment/quality-improvement-plans
[49] Australian Government (n.d.) CHC50125 Diploma of Early Childhood Education and Care.
https://training.gov.au/training/details/CHC50125
[50] Early Childhood Development Agency (2026) Educator Certification.
https://www.ecda.gov.sg/early-childhood-educators-%28ece%29/becoming-a-certified-educator/educator-certification
[51] National Institute of Early Childhood Development (2026) Diploma in Early Childhood Care & Education—Teaching (DECCE-T).
https://niec.edu.sg/our-courses/diplomas/diploma-in-early-childhood-care-education-teaching-decce-t/
[52] Early Childhood Development Agency (2026) Professional Development Programme for Educators.
https://www.ecda.gov.sg/early-childhood-educators-(ece)/professional-programmes/professional-development-programme/professional-development-programme-educators