数学专业学生AI素养评价——基于组合赋权云模型
Assessment of AI Literacy among Mathematics Majors—Based on a Combined Weighting Cloud Model
DOI: 10.12677/ae.2026.1692020, PDF,    科研立项经费支持
作者: 潘兴侠, 王佳欣:南昌航空大学数学与信息科学学院,江西 南昌
关键词: 数学专业学生AI素养KSAVE模型组合赋权云模型Mathematics Majors AI Literacy KSAVE Model Combination Weighting Cloud Model
摘要: 针对数学专业AI素养评价学科适配性不足、评价存在模糊性与随机性的问题,构建基于最小相对熵组合赋权–云模型的AI素养评价体系。以KSAVE模型为基础,面向数学专业优化指标内涵,建立AI素养评价体系;采用层次分析法与熵权法分别确定主、客观权重,基于最小相对熵原理求解组合权重;引入云模型刻画评价不确定性,实现等级判定。以南昌航空大学202名数学专业学生为样本实证分析,结果表明:学生AI素养整体处于良好偏下水平,AI技能是核心短板;AI方案设计能力与模型数学原理认知权重最高;数学建模竞赛对AI素养提升显著,但作用限于知识与技能层面。该方法兼顾专家经验与数据规律,可为数学专业AI教育改革与分类培养提供科学支撑。
Abstract: To address the issues of insufficient disciplinary alignment and the ambiguity and randomness in the evaluation of AI literacy for mathematics majors, this study constructs an AI literacy evaluation system based on the Minimum Relative Entropy Combined Weighting-Cloud Model. Building upon the KSAVE model, we optimized the indicator definitions for mathematics majors to establish the AI literacy evaluation system; we used the Analytic Hierarchy Process and the entropy weighting method to determine subjective and objective weights, respectively, and calculated the combined weights based on the principle of minimum relative entropy; we introduced the cloud model to characterize evaluation uncertainty and implement grade classification. An empirical analysis was conducted using a sample of 202 mathematics majors at Nanchang University of Aeronautics. The results indicate that students’ overall AI literacy is at a slightly below-average level, with AI skills being the core weakness; AI solution design ability and understanding of the mathematical principles underlying models received the highest weightings; and while mathematics modeling competitions significantly enhance AI literacy, their impact is limited to the knowledge and skills levels. This method integrates expert experience with data patterns and can provide scientific support for AI education reform and differentiated training in mathematics programs.
文章引用:潘兴侠, 王佳欣. 数学专业学生AI素养评价——基于组合赋权云模型[J]. 教育进展, 2026, 16(9): 1265-1277. https://doi.org/10.12677/ae.2026.1692020

参考文献

[1] Long, D. and Magerko, B. (2020) What Is AI Literacy? Competencies and Design Considerations. Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Honolulu, 25-30 April 2020, 1-16.
https://doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376727
[2] Heyder, T. and Posegga, O. (2021) Extending the Foundations of AI Literacy.
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/355318850_Extending_the_foundations_of_AI_literacy
[3] 周琼, 徐亚苹, 蔡迎春. 高校学生人工智能素养能力现状及影响因素多维分析[J]. 图书情报知识, 2024, 41(3): 38-48.
[4] 刘琼, 刘星, 刘桂锋. “人工智能 + 高等教育”应用场景下的AI素养框架研究[J]. 农业图书情报学报, 2024, 36(8): 43-55.
[5] 张静. 高校学生AI赋能外语学习素养: 框架建构与量表开发[J]. 外语电化教学, 2025(1): 69-78+122.
[6] 邵铭宇, 魏亮, 李均强, 等. 生成式人工智能与动态可视化软件整合: 原理、应用与展望[J]. 数学教育学报, 2025, 34(4): 27-35.
[7] 陈张欣宇, 廖博文, 周联. 大学生使用人工智能赋能数学学习现状的调查与研究——以上海海事大学数学专业学生为例[J]. 统计学与应用, 2026, 15(1): 43-55.
[8] 陈荣, 李建霞, 饶海侠, 等. 科研人员人工智能素养评价指标体系构建及应用研究[J]. 情报理论与实践, 2026, 49(7): 87-95+104.
[9] 张志成, 刘徐璋, 刘伟. 基于AHP-熵值法的高椅古村品质提升综合评价[J]. 家具与室内装饰, 2023, 30(9): 124-131.
[10] 胡国强, 弋顺超. 基于层次分析法和熵权法的高校教师教学质量评价——以学生评价教师为例[J]. 内蒙古师范大学学报(教育科学版), 2019, 32(8): 62-66.
[11] 李德毅, 刘常昱, 杜鹢, 等. 不确定性人工智能[J]. 软件学报, 2004, 15(11): 1583-1594.
[12] 姚萱, 杨红刚, 陈必群, 等. 基于博弈论组合赋权-云模型的河流型水源地环境风险评价研究[J]. 环境科学学报, 2025, 45(2): 177-189.
[13] 吴娟, 刘宗毅, 余乐, 等. 基于云模型的网络地理空间情报服务质量综合评估[J]. 情报理论与实践, 2022, 45(4): 47-51+82.