AI智能测评视域下英语师范生教学设计能力的诊断与干预策略
Diagnosis and Intervention Strategies for Pre-Service English Teachers’ Instructional Design Competency from the Perspective of AI-Driven Assessment
摘要: 本研究基于AI智能测评,构建了英语师范生教学设计能力诊断体系,并通过闭环干预模式验证了其有效性。研究采用准实验设计,将189名师范生随机分为三组:A组(人机协同组,接收AI报告 + 教师解读)、B组(传统教师反馈组)、C组(纯AI反馈组)。结果表明,A组在目标设计、内容选择、活动安排及评价方法四个维度上均取得极其显著的提升(p < 0.001),其效果显著优于仅接收教师反馈的B组(p > 0.05)和仅接收AI报告的C组。方差分析进一步证实,A组在所有维度上均表现最佳,而C组在目标设计与评价设计上显著优于B组。该模式通过AI提供的客观诊断与教师的支架式引导,有效提升了师范生的教学设计能力,尤其对低起点学生具有良好补偿效应,为AI赋能教师教育提供了实践路径。
Abstract: This study constructs a diagnostic system for the teaching design ability of English student teachers based on AI intelligent assessment and verifies its effectiveness through a closed-loop intervention model. Using a quasi-experimental design, 189 student teachers were randomly assigned to three groups: Group A (human-AI collaboration, receiving AI reports + teacher interpretation), Group B (traditional teacher feedback), and Group C (AI-only feedback). The results show that Group A achieved extremely significant improvements in all four dimensions of teaching design ability (p < 0.001), significantly outperforming Group B (p > 0.05) and Group C. Further ANOVA analysis confirms that Group A performed best across all dimensions, while Group C significantly outperformed Group B in target design and evaluation design. This model effectively enhances student teachers’ teaching design ability by combining objective AI diagnostics with teacher-led scaffolding, particularly benefiting low-achieving students, and provides a practical pathway for AI-empowered teacher education.
文章引用:王蕾, 陈愉. AI智能测评视域下英语师范生教学设计能力的诊断与干预策略[J]. 创新教育研究, 2026, 14(9): 403-411. https://doi.org/10.12677/ces.2026.149703

参考文献

[1] 钟博维. 基于大语言模型的师范生教学设计智能评价模型的构建及应用[J]. 高教论坛, 2025(4): 73-80.
[2] 刘晓红, 朱敏捷, 陈孝然, 叶新燕, 穆肃. 多智能体支持的职前教师教学能力实训: 建构、实施与成效剖析[J]. 中国电化教育, 2026(5): 111-118.
[3] 中华人民共和国教育部. 普通高中英语课程标准日常修订版(2017年版2025年修订) [S]. 北京: 人民教育出版社, 2020.
[4] Black, P. and Wiliam, D. (1998) Assessment and Classroom Learning. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 5, 7-74.
https://doi.org/10.1080/0969595980050102
[5] Berliner, D.C. (1988) The Development of Expertise in Pedagogy. American Association of Colleges for Teacher Education.
[6] 蒋宇瑛, 谢玉晓, 张燕明. 基于教育大数据的教师专业发展策略研究[J]. 教育科学论坛, 2022(1): 63-66.
[7] Charmaz, K. (2006) Constructing Grounded Theory: A Practical Guide through Qualitative Analysis. Sage Publications.
[8] Smith, P.L. and Ragan, T.J. (2005) Instructional Design. 3rd Edition, Wiley.
[9] Hattie, J. and Timperley, H. (2007) The Power of Feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77, 81-112.
https://doi.org/10.3102/003465430298487
[10] 刘晓玫. 知行合一能致远[J]. 教师视界, 2020(35): 35.