Z世代“朋克养生”与体重管理的心理机制——基于结构方程模型的实证分析
The Psychological Mechanism of Generation Z’s “Punk-Style Health Maintenance” Behavior and Weight Management—An Empirical Analysis Based on Structural Equation Modeling
摘要: 在国家持续推进“体重管理年”行动的背景下,Z世代群体中“朋克养生”与科学体重管理之间的行为矛盾日益凸显。本研究整合计划行为理论、健康信念模型、认知失调理论与自我效能理论,构建“认知–心理–社会–行为”整合分析框架,采用结构方程模型对315份有效问卷数据进行实证检验。研究发现:心理动机是朋克养生行为的最强预测变量(β = 0.522, p < 0.001),外部情境(β = 0.113, p = 0.001)与健康认知(β = −0.118, p < 0.001)亦与矛盾行为显著关联;朋克养生行为与体重管理效果呈显著负向关联(β = −0.494, p < 0.001)。中介效应分析表明,健康认知通过心理动机的部分中介作用间接关联行为(间接效应 = −0.075,95% CI [−0.125, −0.028]),外部情境通过“健康认知 → 心理因素”的链式中介路径产生间接关联(间接效应 = 0.008,95% CI [−0.000, 0.020],假设未达统计显著)。调节效应分析发现,自我效能感既能增强体重管理行为与朋克养生行为的负向关联(交互项β = −0.243,p < 0.001),又会意外加剧心理动机与体重管理效果的负面关联(交互项β = −0.083,p = 0.003),揭示了自我效能感的“双刃剑”效应。研究揭示了“认知–心理–社会–行为”多层传导机制,为理解当代青年健康矛盾行为提供了系统的心理视角与实证依据。
Abstract: Against the backdrop of the national “Weight Management Year” initiative, the behavioral contradiction between “punk-style health maintenance” and scientific weight management among Generation Z has become increasingly prominent. This study integrates the Theory of Planned Behavior, the Health Belief Model, Cognitive Dissonance Theory, and Self-efficacy Theory to construct an integrated analytical framework of “cognition-psychology-society-behavior”. Using structural equation modeling, empirical tests are conducted on 315 valid questionnaire responses. The findings reveal that psychological motivation serves as the strongest predictor of “punk-style health maintenance” behavior (β = 0.522, p < 0.001), while external context (β = 0.113, p = 0.001) and health cognition (β = −0.118, p < 0.001) are also significantly associated with such behaviors. Punk-style health maintenance behaviors are significantly negatively associated with weight management outcomes (β = −0.494, p < 0.001). Mediation analysis indicates that health cognition is indirectly associated with behavior through the partial mediating role of psychological motivation (indirect effect = −0.075, 95% CI [−0.125, −0.028]), and external context is indirectly associated with behavior through the chain mediation path of “health cognition → psychological factors” (indirect effect = 0.008, 95% CI [−0.000, 0.020], hypothesis not statistically significant). Moderation analysis reveals that self-efficacy not only strengthens the negative association between weight management behaviors and punk-style health maintenance behaviors (interaction term β = −0.243, p < 0.001) but also unexpectedly intensifies the negative association between psychological motivation and weight management outcomes (interaction term β = −0.083, p = 0.003), revealing the “double-edged sword” effect of self-efficacy. This study clarifies the multi-layer transmission mechanism of “cognition-psychology-society-behavior”, providing a systematic psychological perspective and empirical evidence for understanding contradictory health behaviors among contemporary youth.
文章引用:杨荟如, 盛阳 (2026). Z世代“朋克养生”与体重管理的心理机制——基于结构方程模型的实证分析. 心理学进展, 16(9), 147-159. https://doi.org/10.12677/ap.2026.169439

参考文献

[1] 何绍辉(2022). Z世代青年的形成背景与群体特征. 中国青年研究, (8), 14-20.
[2] 李爱琴, 谭斯元(2025). Z世代青年消费行为透视及其应对策略. 边疆经济与文化, (11), 128-134.
[3] 李晓艳(2025). 矛盾式在场: 青年“朋克养生”的亚文化现象解析. 青少年学刊, (3), 34-40.
[4] 王奇金(2026). “治未病”与全程管理: 《“体重管理年”活动实施方案》解读. 海军军医大学学报, 47(2), 155-159.
[5] 魏丽莎, 叶子(2024). 中国青年热衷“朋克养生”. 英语世界, 43(1), 26-30.
[6] 杨胜淞, 吕春瑾, 曹峰, 等(2025). 朋克养生现象及对策研究. 现代养生, 25(9), 714-716.
[7] 于振懿(2024). 基于扎根理论的Z世代青年朋克养生消费文化实践研究. 硕士学位论文, 杭州: 浙江传媒学院.
[8] Ajzen, I. (1991). The Theory of Planned Behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50, 179-211.
https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-t
[9] Bandura, A. (1986). Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory. Prentice-Hall.
[10] Festinger, L. (1957). A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance. Stanford University Press.
[11] Hewitt, P. L., & Flett, G. L. (2002). Perfectionism: Theory, Research, and Treatment. American Psychological Association.
[12] Jones, E. E., & Berglas, S. (1990). Control of Attributions about the Self through Self-Handicapping Strategies. In R. L. Higgins, C. R. Snyder, & S. Berglas (Eds.), Self-Handicapping: The Paradox That Isn’t (pp. 3-28). Plenum Press.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-0861-2_5
[13] Prochaska, J. O., & DiClemente, C. C. (1983). Stages and Processes of Self-Change of Smoking: Toward an Integrative Model of Change. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 51, 390-395.
https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-006x.51.3.390
[14] Rosenstock, I. M., Strecher, V. J., & Becker, M. H. (1988). Social Learning Theory and the Health Belief Model. Health Education Quarterly, 15, 175-183.
https://doi.org/10.1177/109019818801500203
[15] World Health Organization (WHO) (2000). Obesity: Preventing and Managing the Global Epidemic. WHO.