心理丰富性问卷在沿边地区应用型高校大学生中的信效度分析
Reliability and Validity of the Psychological Richness Questionnaire in Application Oriented College Students in Border Areas
DOI: 10.12677/ap.2026.169443, PDF,    科研立项经费支持
作者: 杨益昌, 郭 君, 杨 翠：滇西应用技术大学珠宝学院，云南 腾冲；瞿艳明：云南省腾冲市教育体育局，云南 腾冲；邓德凡：云南省腾冲市科学技术协会，云南 腾冲
关键词: 心理丰富性问卷；沿边地区应用型高校；信度；效度；Psychological Richness Questionnaire； Application-Oriented Colleges in Border Regions； Reliability； Validity
摘要: 目的：检验中文短版心理丰富性问卷在沿边地区应用型高校大学生群体中的信效度。方法：以西南某省两所沿边地区应用型高校1027名大学生为研究对象，以认知灵活性问卷作为效标工具，幸福倾向量表的意义分量表和快乐分量表为聚合–区分度工具。对数据进行项目分析、探索性因子分析、效标效度分析、聚合–区分效度分析和信度分析，4周后选取100名被试重测。结果：项目分析显示，中文短版心理丰富性问卷具有良好的鉴别力；因子分析结果支持短版心理丰富性问卷的单因素结构，量表的Cronbach’s α系数为0.94，分半信度为0.91，4周后重测信度为0.80；中文短版心理丰富性问卷与认知灵活性问卷呈显著正相关，与快乐、意义分量表呈中等程度显著正相关。结论：中文短版心理丰富性问卷在沿边地区应用型高校大学生群体中具有稳定的单因子结构和良好的信效度，可作为评估该地区大学生心理丰富性的有效工具。
Abstract: Objective: To test the reliability and validity of the Chinese short version psychological richness questionnaire in the Application-oriented College Students in the border areas. Methods: 1027 college students from two application-oriented universities along the border in a southwest province were selected as the research objects. The cognitive flexibility questionnaire was used as the criterion tool, and the meaning subscale and happiness subscale of the happiness tendency scale were used as the aggregation discrimination tools. The data were analyzed by item analysis, exploratory factor analysis, criterion validity analysis, aggregation discrimination validity analysis and reliability analysis. After 4 weeks, 100 subjects were selected to retest. Results: the item analysis showed that the Chinese short version psychological richness questionnaire had good discrimination; the Cronbach’s α coefficient was 0.94, the split half reliability was 0.91, and the test-retest reliability was 0.80 after 4 weeks; the Chinese short version of the psychological richness questionnaire was significantly positively correlated with the cognitive flexibility questionnaire, and moderately significantly positively correlated with the happiness and meaning subscale. Conclusion: The Chinese short version psychological richness questionnaire has a stable single factor structure and good reliability and validity in the application-oriented college students in the border areas, and can be used as an effective tool to evaluate the psychological richness of college students in this area.
文章引用：杨益昌, 郭君, 杨翠, 瞿艳明, 邓德凡 (2026). 心理丰富性问卷在沿边地区应用型高校大学生中的信效度分析. 心理学进展, 16(9), 188-195. https://doi.org/10.12677/ap.2026.169443

参考文献

[1] 石霞飞, 王芳, 左世江(2015). 追求快乐还是追求意义? 青少年幸福倾向及其对学习行为的影响. 心理发展与教育, 31(5), 586-593.
[2] 王亚静, 任孝鹏, 张力(2022a). 心理丰富性量表在中国大学生样本中信效度检验. 中国临床心理学杂志, 30(4), 936-939.
[3] 王亚静, 任孝鹏, 张力(2022b). 心理丰富性: 一种新的幸福感形式. 心理技术与应用, 10(10), 631-640.
[4] Besser, L. L., & Oishi, S. (2020). The Psychologically Rich Life. Philosophical Psychology, 33, 1053-1071.
https://doi.org/10.1080/09515089.2020.1778662
[5] Diamond, A. (2013). Executive Functions. Annual Review of Psychology, 64, 135-168.
https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-113011-143750
[6] Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J. et al. (2010). Multivariate Data Analysis (7th ed.). Prentice Hall.
[7] Martin, M. M., & Rubin, R. B. (1995). A New Measure of Cognitive Flexibility. Psychological Reports, 76, 623-626.
https://doi.org/10.2466/pr0.1995.76.2.623
[8] Mauro, F., Di Trani, M., & Simione, L. (2025). The Psychologically Rich Life Questionnaire: Italian Validation and Exploration of Its Relationships with Mindfulness, Self-Compassion, and Cognitive Fusion within the Health Psychology Framework. Frontiers in Psychology, 16, Article 1525300.
https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1525300
[9] Oishi, S., & Westgate, E. C. (2022). A Psychologically Rich Life: Beyond Happiness and Meaning. Psychological Review, 129, 790-811.
https://doi.org/10.1037/rev0000317
[10] Oishi, S., Choi, H., Buttrick, N., Heintzelman, S. J., Kushlev, K., Westgate, E. C. et al. (2019). The Psychologically Rich Life Questionnaire. Journal of Research in Personality, 81, 257-270.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2019.06.010
[11] Oishi, S., Choi, H., Koo, M., Galinha, I., Ishii, K., Komiya, A. et al. (2020). Happiness, Meaning, and Psychological Richness. Affective Science, 1, 107-115.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s42761-020-00011-z
[12] Oishi, S., Graham, J., Kesebir, S., & Galinha, I. C. (2013). Concepts of Happiness across Time and Cultures. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 39, 559-577.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167213480042
[13] Peterson, C., Park, N., & Seligman, M. E. P. (2005). Orientations to Happiness and Life Satisfaction: The Full Life versus the Empty Life. Journal of Happiness Studies, 6, 25-41.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-004-1278-z
[14] Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2001). On Happiness and Human Potentials: A Review of Research on Hedonic and Eudaimonic Well-Being. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 141-166.
https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.141