技术植入与主体消解:数字时代养老服务中的人技关系与反思
Technological Implantation and Subject Dissolution: Human-Technology Relations and Reflections in Elderly Care Services in the Digital Age
摘要: 数字技术的深度介入正在重塑养老服务的实践形态与人际格局。本文以人机传播与技术社会形塑(SST)理论为分析框架,通过资阳市“数智康养”、太仓市“数智工单”、宿迁市“e养通”及Z市虚拟养老院等多个案例,考察数字技术嵌入养老服务的过程与效应。研究发现,技术植入虽在效率维度上实现了对传统养老模式的“赋能”,却在关系维度上催生了老年主体消解的风险。然而,这种消解并非技术单向作用的结果,而是技术逻辑与社会结构相互建构的产物。本文主张,智慧养老的出路应倡导人本主义与价值共创,推动从“技术适配”到“价值共创”的转变,并借鉴国内外参与式设计经验,提出老年用户深度参与、制度激励相容、行业标准引领等具体路径,使技术真正服务于老年人的主体性。
Abstract: The deep integration of digital technologies is reshaping the practical forms and interpersonal dynamics of elderly care services. Using Human-Machine Communication (HMC) and the Social Shaping of Technology (SST) theory as an analytical framework, this study examines the process and effects of digital technology embedding in elderly care through multiple case studies, including the “Digital Smart Health and Elderly Care” in Ziyang City, the “Digital Smart Work Order” system in Taicang City, the “e-Yangtong” platform in Suqian City, and the virtual nursing home in City Z. The research finds that although technological implantation achieves “empowerment” of traditional care models in terms of efficiency, it also generates risks of elderly subject dissolution in relational dimensions. However, this dissolution is not a one-way result of technology but a product of the co-construction of technological logic and social structures. This paper argues that the way forward for smart elderly care lies in advocating humanism and value co-creation, promoting a shift from “technological adaptation” to “value co-creation”, drawing on domestic and international participatory design practices to propose specific pathways involving in-depth user participation, institutional incentives, and industry standards.
文章引用:许曦文. 技术植入与主体消解:数字时代养老服务中的人技关系与反思[J]. 老龄化研究, 2026, 13(9): 163-169. https://doi.org/10.12677/ar.2026.139640

参考文献

[1] 吴君槐, 陈溢瑞. 智慧养老的技术伦理问题及解决进路[J]. 华北水利水电大学学报(社会科学版), 2025, 41(4): 105-114.
[2] 申琦. 以人机传播推动老龄社会治理[N]. 中国社会科学报, 2024-08-27(A06).
[3] 李霄骞, 彭兰. 智能时代的关系织造: 迈向人与非人的对称共生——2025年中国智能传播研究述评[J]. 福建师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2026(1): 131-145, 172.
[4] 杨钊. 智能化养老工具理性和价值理性的分野与耦合[J]. 新疆社会科学, 2024(3): 167-175.
[5] 曹磊. 江苏省太仓市“数智工单”织密居家养老服务质量监管网[N]. 中国社会报, 2026-03-26(A04).
[6] 赵思燕, 陈军硕, 叶良均. 数智技术赋能农村居家养老的困境与路径——基于黄山乡村的实证研究[J]. 海南开放大学学报, 2025, 26(3): 140-146.
[7] 张洋阳, 黄建洪. 数字时代虚拟养老的实践逻辑及风险规避——以Z市虚拟养老院为例[J]. 内蒙古社会科学, 2023, 44(3): 165-174.
[8] 张钒. 技术-制度互构: AI赋能养老服务的现实图景、结构性冲突与协同路径[J]. 人口与社会, 2025, 41(6): 104-115.
[9] 江颖, 张佳妮. 从“数字赋权”到“数字迷失”: 数字时代老年生存境遇的伦理审思[J]. 湖南开放大学学报, 2026(2): 1-10.
[10] 朱荟, 吴梓睿. 人工智能 + 中国式养老的理论转向、算法风险与赋能路径[J]. 南开学报(哲学社会科学版), 2026(2): 58-67.
[11] 朱智渊. 论人工智能时代智慧居家养老服务平台的构建逻辑与实践路径[J]. 攀枝花学院学报, 2025, 42(6): 22-30.