从“角色退出”到“角色替代”:老龄化进程中老年社会参与的困境与重构机制
From “Role Withdrawal” to “Role Substitution”: The Dilemmas and Reconstruction Mechanisms of Elderly Social Participation in the Aging Process
摘要: 人口老龄化的深层挑战并非单纯的经济赡养压力,而是老年人在退出职业与家庭等场域后所面临的“社会属性”丧失危机。本文构建“角色推出–社会属性丧失–角色替代”的分析框架,探讨老年人社会参与困境的生成机制与重建路径。研究发现:传统家庭模式的瓦解导致老年人在家庭内部经历了从“当家人”到“被赡养者”的身份降级;退休制度的强制性则在社会层面制造了结构性的角色真空。而当前以银发经济和智慧养老为代表的政策产业实践,仅将老年人定位为“消费者”或“被服务者”,加剧了其社会参与的单向度性与边缘化。老年人社会属性的重建,关键在于从“被赡养”转向“被需要”。互助养老中的“助人者”角色、民族文化传承中的“传承者”角色以及老年组织中的“行动者”角色,构成了角色替代的三条可能路径,其共同机制在于恢复老年人作为社会行动主体的价值感与尊严感。
Abstract: The profound challenge of population aging lies not merely in economic support pressures, but in the crisis of “social identity” loss that older adults face after withdrawing from professional and family spheres. This paper constructs an analytical framework of “role withdrawal-loss of social identity-role substitution” to explore the mechanisms underlying the dilemmas of older adults’ social participation and pathways for reconstruction. The study finds that the dissolution of traditional family models has led to a demotion of older adults’ identities within the family, from “head of the household” to “dependent”; meanwhile, the mandatory nature of retirement systems has created a structural role vacuum at the societal level. Current policy and industrial practices, exemplified by the “silver economy” and “smart aging”, position older adults solely as “consumers” or “service recipients”, thereby exacerbating the one-dimensionality and marginalization of their social participation. The reconstruction of older adults’ social attributes hinges on shifting from being “dependent” to being “needed”. The roles of “helper” in mutual-aid eldercare, “transmitter” in the inheritance of ethnic culture, and “actor” in senior organizations constitute three potential pathways for role substitution. Their common mechanism lies in restoring older adults’ sense of value and dignity as agents of social action.
文章引用:马苑妮. 从“角色退出”到“角色替代”:老龄化进程中老年社会参与的困境与重构机制[J]. 老龄化研究, 2026, 13(9): 176-183. https://doi.org/10.12677/ar.2026.139642

参考文献

[1] 杜鹏, 陈民强. 积极应对人口老龄化: 政策演进与国家战略实施[J]. 新疆师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2022, 43(3): 91-99+2.
[2] 朱琳, 左亚梅. 老年人社会参与研究进展及启示[J]. 中国老年保健医学, 2026, 24(1): 134-138.
[3] 康帆, 许思媛. 老年艺术教育促进社会参与的路径研究[J]. 住宅与房地产, 2026(10): 63-65.
[4] 张文娟. 老龄工作管理[M]. 北京: 中国人民大学出版社, 2017: 41-44.
[5] Mancini, N.W. (1975) Role Exits among the Aged. Master’s Thesis, Portland State University.
[6] 詹茜舒. 社会工作介入独居长者居家适老化改造的实务研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 广州: 广东工业大学, 2025.
[7] 沈费伟. 城乡融合发展背景下乡村社会的重建逻辑[J]. 西安建筑科技大学学报(社会科学版), 2025, 44(1): 30-36.
[8] 费孝通. 家庭结构变动中的老年赡养问题——再论中国家庭结构的变动[J]. 北京大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 1983(3): 7-16.
[9] 阎云翔. 私人生活的变革: 一个中国村庄里的爱情、家庭与亲密关系[M]. 龚小夏, 译. 上海: 上海人民出版社, 2016: 128-209.
[10] Atchley, R.C. (1976) The Sociology of Retirement. Schenkman Publishing Company.
[11] 王辉, 陈筱媛. 以农村互助养老促进老有所为: 内在机制、现实困境与优化路径[J]. 中国农村经济, 2026(4): 26-47.
[12] 郝亚光, 潘琼. 差序整合: 农村互助养老实现的机制分析[J]. 云南社会科学, 2024(2): 140-148.
[13] Li, B. (2026) Oral Records and Research on Intangible Cultural Heritage Inheritors of Yi Ethnic Medicine. ProbeMedia and Communication Studies, 8, 59-61.
[14] 翟天麟. 美育视阈下非遗撕纸艺术对老年群体健康促进的价值与路径研究[J]. 艺术教育, 2026(6): 234-237.
[15] 丁妍. 非遗文化融入老年教育的标准化路径探索与实践成效研究[J]. 标准生活, 2026(3): 102-104.
[16] 汪龙鑫, 钟丹, 陈涛. 重构社会基础: 结构-行动视角下农村互助养老的行动逻辑[J]. 华中农业大学学报(社会科学版), 2025(6): 172-181.
[17] 沈燕. 老有所为: 数字化时代老年人社会参与与老年健康[M]. 北京: 中国经济出版社, 2024.