基层治理视角下社区体育公共资源配置优化研究

Research on the Optimization of Community Sports Public Resource Allocation from the Perspective of Grassroots Governance

摘要: 社区体育公共资源是全民健身公共服务体系落地基层的重要载体，也是推动基层治理现代化、构建基层共建共治共享治理格局的重要支撑。文章以协同治理理论为研究基础，立足基层治理现实场景，搭建“理论要素–现状研判–问题剖析–优化策略”的闭环研究体系，系统梳理我国社区体育公共资源配置的现有发展成效。研究发现，当前社区体育资源配置工作仍存在多元主体权责划分不清、治理力量分散割裂；资源供给模式单一固化、供需精准对接水平不足；配套管理制度不够完善、资源长期运维利用效率偏低；各类资源相互阻隔、整体治理效能难以释放等现实问题。针对以上现存问题，文章从四个层面探索适配基层治理场景的社区体育公共资源配置优化路径：一是厘清多元主体权责关系、搭建基层共治体系；二是立足群众实际需求、优化资源供给结构；三是健全长效管理机制、提升资源运维质量；四是破除各类资源壁垒、推动治理提质增效。

Abstract: Community sports public resources are an important carrier for the national fitness public service system to be implemented at the grassroots level. They are also an important support for promoting the modernization of grassroots governance and building a grassroots co-construction, co-governance, and shared governance pattern. This article uses the theory of collaborative governance as the research basis, based on the actual scenario of grassroots governance, and builds a closed-loop research system of “theoretical elements, status quo analysis, problem analysis, optimization strategies” to systematically review the existing development results of my country’s community sports public resource allocation. The study found that the current community sports resource allocation work still faces practical problems such as unclear division of rights and responsibilities among multiple subjects, scattered and fragmented governance forces; a single and solidified resource supply model, and an insufficient level of accurate connection between supply and demand; insufficient supporting management systems, low efficiency in long-term operation and maintenance of resources; various types of resources blocked from each other, and the overall governance efficiency is difficult to release. In response to the above existing problems, this article explores the optimization path of community sports public resource allocation that adapts to grassroots governance scenarios from four levels: first, clarifying the rights and responsibilities of multiple subjects and building a grassroots co-governance system; second, optimizing the resource supply structure based on the actual needs of the masses; third, improving long-term management mechanisms and improving the quality of resource operation and maintenance; fourth, breaking down various resource barriers and promoting governance to improve quality and efficiency.