开放型区域产教融合实践中心研究的进展、逻辑与展望

Research Progress, Logic and Prospects of Open Regional Industry-Education Integration Practice Centers

摘要: 本文旨在把握开放型区域产教融合实践中心领域的研究进展，梳理该领域的理论脉络与核心争议。以“开放型区域产教融合实践中心”为主题词，检索中国知网2022年12月以来刊发的文献，经逐级筛选确定8篇核心期刊论文与4篇高下载量、高被引普通期刊论文作为核心分析样本，并以3份政策文件为互证文本，采用内容分析法作三级编码。研究发现：既有研究围绕内涵特征、价值功能与现实困境已形成共识性认识；共生理论、资源理论与现代组织理论分别从结构整合、资源机制与组织设计层面拓展了理论纵深，但三者缺乏实质性对话，实践中心从“场所”向“枢纽”跃迁的微观机制尚未得到充分解释。据此，本文构建“结构–过程–设计”三维整合分析框架，阐明三种理论的内在逻辑关联与潜在张力，演绎出四条可证伪的研究命题；进而按照“理论深化–方法拓展–视角补位–议题延伸”的逻辑提出未来研究纲领，将框架维度与研究问题、研究方法及可观测指标一一对应，形成可操作的研究议程。

Abstract: This article reviews research on open regional industry-education integration practice centers in China, tracing the field’s theoretical threads and core debates. Taking “open regional industry-education integration practice center” as the subject term, we searched CNKI for literature published since December 2022. Stepwise screening yielded 8 core-journal articles and 4 highly downloaded, highly cited general-journal articles as the core analytical sample, while 3 policy documents served as corroborating texts; content analysis with three-level coding was then applied. The findings show that existing studies have reached a consensual understanding of the centers’ connotations and characteristics, value functions, and practical dilemmas. Symbiosis theory, resource theory, and modern organization theory have each added theoretical depth from the angles of structural integration, resource mechanisms, and organizational design; yet the three perspectives rarely engage with one another, leaving the micro-level mechanisms behind the centers’ transition from “venues” to “hubs” inadequately explained. We therefore construct a “structure-process-design” three-dimensional integrative analytical framework, in which the logical connections and potential tensions among the three theories are clarified, and four falsifiable research propositions are derived. Following the logic of theoretical deepening, methodological expansion, perspective restoration, and thematic extension, we further propose a research agenda that maps the framework’s dimensions onto research questions, methods, and observable indicators, offering an actionable reference for subsequent studies.