数字时代地方应用型本科院校思政课教学转型的生态学考察
An Ecological Study on the Transformation of Ideological and Political Education in Local Applied Undergraduate Institutions in the Digital Age
DOI: 10.12677/ass.2026.159760, PDF,    科研立项经费支持
作者: 闫彩虹*:淮安大学马克思主义学院,江苏 淮安;李 娴:南京工业职业技术大学马克思主义学院,江苏 南京
关键词: 地方应用型本科院校思政课数字化教学教育生态学教学转型Local Application-Oriented Undergraduate Institutions Ideological and Political Courses Digital Teaching Educational Ecology Teaching Transformation
摘要: 数字技术正深刻重塑高校思政课教学生态。地方应用型本科院校作为我国高等教育体系的重要组成部分,其思政课数字化转型既承载着教育现代化的时代使命,又面临着区别于研究型大学的特殊困境。以教育生态学为理论视角,构建了“主体–介体–环体–功能”四维分析框架,通过对已有文献的系统梳理和典型院校案例的比较分析,揭示了当前面临的教师数字胜任力不足与学生主体性参与缺失的结构性矛盾、数字化教学资源供需错配与话语体系适配性不足、虚实融合教学场域的条件制约与价值风险、教学评价精准化诉求与传统模式间的张力等四重困境。在此基础上,从主体生态位调适、介体话语体系重塑、环体协同场域构建、功能精准化供给四个维度提出生态重构路径,以期为地方应用型本科院校思政课数字化教学提供理论参考与实践借鉴。
Abstract: Digital technology is profoundly reshaping the teaching ecology of ideological and political courses in higher education institutions. As an important component of higher education system in China, local application-oriented undergraduate institutions bear the contemporary mission of educational modernization in the digital transformation of their ideological and political courses, while simultaneously confronting unique dilemmas that distinguish them from research-oriented universities. From the theoretical perspective of educational ecology, this study constructs a “subjects, mediators, environment, and functions” four-dimensional analytical framework. Through systematic review of existing literature and comparative analysis of case studies from representative institutions, it identifies four major structural dilemmas: insufficient digital competence among teachers and lack of student agency; misalignment between supply and demand for digital teaching resources and inadequate adaptation of discourse systems; constraints and value risks associated with integrating virtual and physical teaching environments; and tensions between the demand for precise teaching evaluation and traditional assessment models. Based on these findings, the paper proposes an ecological reconstruction pathway across four dimensions: adjusting the ecological niche of subjects, reshaping the discourse system of mediators, building collaborative teaching environments, and enabling precise functional delivery. This framework aims to provide theoretical guidance and practical insights for the digital transformation of ideological and political education in local applied undergraduate institutions.
文章引用:闫彩虹, 李娴. 数字时代地方应用型本科院校思政课教学转型的生态学考察[J]. 社会科学前沿, 2026, 15(9): 340-349. https://doi.org/10.12677/ass.2026.159760

参考文献

[1] 林顺华, 刘喜如. 例谈数字化教学资源与思政课教学的深度融合[J]. 思想政治课教学, 2024(5): 27-30.
[2] 卞靖懿. 基于虚拟仿真技术的高校思政课数字化教学平台构建研究[J]. 情报科学, 2023, 41(12): 91-98, 126.
[3] 任艳妮. 以“融合式教学”推进高校思政课高质量发展的价值意蕴和实践理路[J]. 黑龙江高教研究, 2025, 43(1): 104-111.
[4] 田永静, 李潇涵. 数智技术赋能“大思政课”实践教学研究[J]. 思想教育研究, 2024(6): 114-119.
[5] 陈琳, 戴建兵. 数字化时代高校思政课教师工作内在逻辑的“变”与“不变” [J]. 黑龙江高教研究, 2025, 43(11): 108-112.
[6] 郭小平, 连育青. 数字化赋能应用型本科院校“双师型”教师队伍建设的探析[J]. 中国多媒体与网络教学学报, 2024(5): 105-108.
[7] 侯赞华. 数智时代高校思政课教学生态的崭新图景、现实挑战与优化路径[J]. 江苏高教, 2026(1): 84-92.
[8] 姜仕华, 马俊峰. 思政课数字化转型教学话语生态重塑动因、表征与优化路径[J]. 黑龙江高教研究, 2025, 43(5): 83-88.
[9] 季海菊, 王艺润. 数字生态下高校思政课教学相长的认知逻辑与效果反馈[J]. 南京社会科学, 2024(10): 123-133.
[10] 侯保龙. 应用型本科院校思政课教学方法改革的原则与路径[J]. 思想理论教育导刊, 2015(6): 92-94.
[11] 李慧. 智能教育时代思政课教学生态系统的动态平衡[J]. 天津电大学报, 2020, 24(2): 5-9.
[12] 蒋松. 教育数字化背景下思想政治理论课教学资源库建设初探[J]. 思想理论教育, 2024(1): 77-82.
[13] 高艳杰. 高校思政课数字化教学资源库建设论析[J]. 思想理论教育, 2026(3): 71-77.
[14] 许瑞芳, 张羽晰. 数智技术赋能大中小学思政课一体化的机遇和挑战[J]. 中国德育, 2025(20): 38-42, 57.
[15] 刘祥玲. 教育数字化转型中高校课程思政的困境与应对[J]. 中国电化教育, 2022(8): 100-105.
[16] 陈静. 思政课教学质量评价的数字化建设[J]. 思想政治课教学, 2023(6): 22-24.
[17] 米晓娟. 数字化赋能应用型高校思政课规范化建设研究[J]. 中国标准化, 2025(20): 238-243.
[18] 李明雨. 应用型本科院校教育数字化转型路径研究[J]. 阅江学刊, 2023, 15(6): 140-148.