考虑自动与人工驾驶车辆运动异质性的冲突风险影响因素研究
Influencing Factors Analysis of Conflict Risk Accounting for Motion Heterogeneity between Automated and Human-Driven Vehicles
DOI: 10.12677/ojtt.2026.155058, PDF,    科研立项经费支持
作者: 李大鸣, 杨丽平*, 王建豪, 张 萌:山东交通学院交通与物流工程学院,山东 济南;陆 键:山东交通学院交通与物流工程学院,山东 济南;同济大学交通学院,上海
关键词: 交通安全自动与人工驾驶车辆冲突风险影响因素随机参数Logit模型Traffic Safety Automated Vehicles and Human-Driven Vehicles Conflict Risk Influencing Factors Random Parameters Logit Model
摘要: 本研究旨在探究无信号交叉口中自动驾驶车辆(AV)与人工驾驶车辆(HV)混合交通环境下的冲突风险影响因素。研究基于公开数据集Argoverse-2,提取了直行与左转车辆的冲突事件。研究采用后侵入时间(PET)作为风险度量指标,并通过平均残余寿命图法来确定高/低风险冲突的阈值。核心方法上,研究构建了考虑均值异质性的随机参数Logit模型,以分析两种交互场景下(AV左转-HV直行;AV直行-HV左转)车辆运动特征、交互特征以及通行顺序对冲突风险的影响。研究发现:在AV左转场景中,HV直行时的紧急制动是关键风险因素;在AV直行场景中,HV左转时较高的速度和加减速度,以及对AV路权优先性的不遵守,会显著增加冲突风险。研究同时指出,AV能通过主动的速度调控有效降低风险。该研究为混合交通环境下的交叉口安全管理提供了理论依据。
Abstract: This study aims to investigate the factors influencing conflict risk in mixed traffic environments involving an Autonomous Vehicle (AV) and a Human-driven Vehicle (HV) at unsignalized intersections. Based on the publicly available Argoverse-2 dataset, conflict events between straight-moving and left-turning vehicles were extracted. Post-Encroachment Time (PET) was adopted as the risk metric, and the mean residual life plot method was applied to determine the threshold between high-risk and low-risk conflicts. A random parameters Logit model with heterogeneity in means was developed to analyze the effects of vehicle motion features, interaction features, and passing order on conflict risk under two interaction scenarios (AV left turn and HV straight; AV straight and HV turning left). The results indicated that in the AV left-turn scenario, emergency braking by a straight-moving HV was a key risk factor. In the AV straight-moving scenario, higher speed and greater acceleration/deceleration of a left-turning HV, as well as non-compliance with the right-of-way priority of the AV, significantly exacerbated conflict risk. It was also found that the AV could effectively reduce risk through active speed regulation. Theoretical support for intersection safety management in mixed traffic environments can be provided by these findings.
文章引用:李大鸣, 杨丽平, 陆键, 王建豪, 张萌. 考虑自动与人工驾驶车辆运动异质性的冲突风险影响因素研究[J]. 交通技术, 2026, 15(5): 676-686. https://doi.org/10.12677/ojtt.2026.155058

参考文献

[1] Liu, P. (2024) Social Interactions between Automated Vehicles and Human Drivers: A Narrative Review. Ergonomics, 68, 1761-1780.
https://doi.org/10.1080/00140139.2024.2435038
[2] Sarran, S. and Hassan, Y. (2025) Intersection Sight Distance in Mixed Automated and Conventional Vehicle Environments with Yield Control on Minor Roads. Smart Cities, 8, Article 73.
https://doi.org/10.3390/smartcities8030073
[3] Lee, S., Jo, Y., Jung, A., Park, J. and Oh, C. (2024) Evaluation of Automated Driving Safety in Urban Mixed Traffic Environments. IET Intelligent Transport Systems, 18, 2963-2976.
https://doi.org/10.1049/itr2.12602
[4] Li, Z.C., Li, L.J. and Huang, J.L. (2026) Exploiting the Benevolent Machine: Psychological Antecedents of Human Drivers’ Strategic Exploitation Intentions toward Autonomous Vehicles in Mixed Traffic. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 120, Article ID: 103616.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2026.103616
[5] Zheng, L., Ismail, K. and Meng, X.H. (2014) Traffic Conflict Techniques for Road Safety Analysis: Open Questions and Some Insights. Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, 41, 633-641.
https://doi.org/10.1139/cjce-2013-0558
[6] 蔡建伟, 李天能, 潘江雄, 等. 高速公路改扩建施工区合流段交通冲突时空分布研究[J]. 中国安全生产科学技术, 2026, 22(7): 106-113.
[7] Wei, S.S. and Shao, M.H. (2024) Existence of Connected and Autonomous Vehicles in Mixed Traffic: Impacts on Safety and Environment. Traffic Injury Prevention, 25, 390-399.
https://doi.org/10.1080/15389588.2023.2291337
[8] Jiao, Y., Li, G.P., Calvert, S.C., van Cranenburgh, S. and van Lint, H. (2024) Beyond Behavioural Change: Investigating Alternative Explanations for Shorter Time Headways When Human Drivers Follow Automated Vehicles. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 164, Article ID: 104673.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2024.104673
[9] 鲁光泉, 谭海天, 张浩. 自动驾驶车辆对人工驾驶车辆跟驰行为影响分析[J]. 上海理工大学学报, 2023, 45(4): 321-331.
[10] Li, G., Jiao, Y., Calvert, S.C. and van Lint, J.W.C. (2024) Lateral Conflict Resolution Data Derived from Argoverse-2: Analysing Safety and Efficiency Impacts of Autonomous Vehicles at Intersections. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 167, Article ID: 104802.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2024.104802
[11] Ashraf, M.T. and Dey, K. (2025) Conflict Resolution Behavior of Autonomous Vehicles at Intersections under Mixed Traffic Environment. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 211, Article ID: 107897.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2024.107897
[12] Yang, M.L., Yang, X.B., Mu, C.X. and Zhu, S. (2026) Influence Factors and Model Selection for Conflict Risk in Different Car-Following Behaviors: Insights from Automated and Human-Driven Vehicles. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 224, Article ID: 108286.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2025.108286
[13] Markkula, G., Madigan, R., Nathanael, D., Portouli, E., Lee, Y.M., Dietrich, A., et al. (2020) Defining Interactions: A Conceptual Framework for Understanding Interactive Behaviour in Human and Automated Road Traffic. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science, 21, 728-752.
https://doi.org/10.1080/1463922x.2020.1736686
[14] Wilson, B., Qi, W., Agarwal, T. et al. (2023) Argoverse 2: Next Generation Datasets for Self-Driving Perception and Forecasting. arXiv: 2301.00493.
[15] Paefgen, J., Kehr, F., Zhai, Y. and Michahelles, F. (2012) Driving Behavior Analysis with Smartphones: Insights from a Controlled Field Study. Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Mobile and Ubiquitous Multimedia, Ulm, 4-6 December 2012, 1-8.
https://doi.org/10.1145/2406367.2406412
[16] Gemonet, E., Bougard, C., Masfrand, S., Honnet, V. and Mestre, D.R. (2021) Car Drivers Coping with Hazardous Events in Real versus Simulated Situations: Declarative, Behavioral and Physiological Data Used to Assess Drivers’ Feeling of Presence. PLOS ONE, 16, e0247373.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0247373
[17] Mahmud, S.M.S., Ferreira, L., Hoque, M.S. and Tavassoli, A. (2017) Application of Proximal Surrogate Indicators for Safety Evaluation: A Review of Recent Developments and Research Needs. IATSS Research, 41, 153-163.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iatssr.2017.02.001
[18] Hussain, F., Li, Y., Arun, A. and Haque, M.M. (2022) A Hybrid Modelling Framework of Machine Learning and Extreme Value Theory for Crash Risk Estimation Using Traffic Conflicts. Analytic Methods in Accident Research, 36, Article ID: 100248.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amar.2022.100248
[19] Geng, Z.S., Ji, X.F., Cao, R., Lu, M. and Qin, W. (2022) A Conflict Measures-Based Extreme Value Theory Approach to Predicting Truck Collisions and Identifying High-Risk Scenes on Two-Lane Rural Highways. Sustainability, 14, Article 11212.
https://doi.org/10.3390/su141811212
[20] 温惠英, 成杰, 赵胜. 基于随机参数Logit模型的车辆冲突风险影响因素研究[J]. 重庆交通大学学报(自然科学版), 2023, 42(12): 113-120.