崩坡积体浅埋偏压隧道超前支护体系受力变形特征研究
Study on Stress and Deformation Characteristics of Advanced Support System in Shallow-Buried Bias Tunnel under Colluvial Deposit
DOI: 10.12677/hjce.2026.159229, PDF,   
作者: 委珍业, 郭亚鹏, 严艳锋, 单高飞, 鲁正元:中交三公局第六工程(河北)有限公司,河北 石家庄;郭鸿雁*:招商局重庆交通科研设计院有限公司,重庆
关键词: 浅埋偏压;崩坡积体;超前支护体系;ABAQUS模型;Shallow-Buried Bias; Colluvial Deposit; Advanced Support System; ABAQUS Model
摘要: 以黄河岸索同坡崩坡积体浅埋偏压隧道为背景,为探究在崩坡积体松散、偏压及浅埋等复杂地质条件下,超前支护体系在动态开挖过程中的受力变形特征,采用ABAQUS有限元软件建立三维精细化数值模型,模拟了单侧壁导坑法施工全过程,对超前管棚和超前小导管进行了受力及变形分析。结果表明:(1) 管棚轴力在空间上呈“左凹右凸”分布,随开挖深度增加,受力趋势由拉力逐渐转变为压力,下导坑开挖是管棚轴力变化的主要控制因素;(2) 小导管轴力同样呈“左凹右凸”形态,其轴力受施工阶段和断面位置控制,轴力响应表现为“激增–阶梯递减–稳定”三阶段演化规律,且对上导坑开挖敏感性较强;(3) 在量值上,小导管所受轴力较管棚小一个数量级,支护效果远不及管棚。研究揭示了浅埋偏压崩坡积体隧道超前支护体系的受力演化机制,可为同类工程设计与施工提供参考。
Abstract: Taking the Suotongpo Tunnel, a shallow-buried bias tunnel located in a colluvial deposit on the bank of the Yellow River, as the engineering background, this study aims to investigate the stress and deformation characteristics of the advanced support system during dynamic excavation under complex geological conditions, including loose colluvial deposit, bias pressure, and shallow overburden. A three dimensional refined numerical model was established using the ABAQUS finite element software to simulate the entire construction process using the single side heading method, and the stress and deformation of the advanced pipe roofs and advanced small pipes were analyzed. The results show that: (1) The axial force of the pipe roofs exhibits a spatial distribution of “concave left and convex right” (i.e., compression on the left and tension on the right). As excavation depth increases, the axial force gradually transitions from tension to compression, with the lower side heading excavation being the dominant controlling factor of the axial force variation. (2) The axial force of the small pipes also exhibits a “concave left and convex right” pattern; it is governed by the construction stage and cross section location, and its evolution follows a three stage trend of “sharp increase-stepwise decrease-stabilization”, with strong sensitivity to upper side heading excavation. (3) In terms of magnitude, the axial force of the small pipes is one order of magnitude smaller than that of the pipe roofs, indicating that the support effectiveness of the small pipes is far inferior to that of the pipe roofs. This study reveals the mechanical evolution mechanism of the advanced support system in shallow-buried bias tunnels under colluvial deposits, which can provide a reference for the design and construction of similar projects.
文章引用:委珍业, 郭亚鹏, 严艳锋, 单高飞, 鲁正元, 郭鸿雁. 崩坡积体浅埋偏压隧道超前支护体系受力变形特征研究[J]. 土木工程, 2026, 15(9): 117-127. https://doi.org/10.12677/hjce.2026.159229

参考文献

[1] 谢亦朋, 杨秀竹, 阳军生, 等. 松散堆积体隧道围岩变形破坏细观特征研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(12): 4925-4934.
[2] Xiao, J.Z., Dai, F.C., Wei, Y.Q., Min, H., Xu, C., Tu, X.B., et al. (2014) Cracking Mechanism of Secondary Lining for a Shallow and Asymmetrically-Loaded Tunnel in Loose Deposits. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 43, 232-240.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2014.05.013
[3] 毛雪松, 王楠, 高胜雨, 等. 川藏公路南线(西藏境)松散堆积体类型[J]. 长安大学学报(自然科学版), 2014, 34(5): 8-14.
[4] 杨建周. 穿越松散堆积体围岩加固与隧道施工技术[J]. 铁道科学与工程学报, 2019, 16(5): 1266-1273.
[5] 冯冀蒙, 谭玉梅, 姚仕钰, 等. 浅埋黏质黄土隧道变形控制机制及措施研究[J]. 隧道建设(中英文), 2023, 43(10): 1712-1722.
[6] 邓祥辉, 刘锦涛, 王睿. 浅埋卵石土层隧道超前支护措施研究[J]. 公路交通科技, 2023, 40(1): 136-143.
[7] 姬云鹏, 房灵国, 唐昊天, 等. 隧道开挖全过程管棚支护受力研究[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2023, 60(3): 123-138.
[8] 张小波, 张雕, 姚池, 等. 考虑微拱效应的隧道洞口段管棚合理间距确定方法及参数分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(6): 1625-1635.
[9] 赵金鹏, 谭忠盛, 梁文广, 等. 超浅埋大跨隧道管棚支护机理及效果分析[J]. 土木工程学报, 2021, 54(S1): 87-96+120.
[10] 阳超, 王玉锁, 张雪松, 等. 砂卵石地层暗挖隧道超前管棚支护技术研究[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2019, 56(S2): 299-307.
[11] 方华昌, 赵东平, 李栋, 等. 砂卵石地层盾构始发下穿管线群加固方案比选研究[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2021, 58(S1): 277-284.
[12] 戴志仁, 胡瑞青, 王泽宇, 等. 砂卵石地层矿山法隧道长管棚支护机理及应用[J]. 铁道工程学报, 2024, 41(4): 68-74.
[13] 张霄, 王明年, 王志龙, 等. 大断面软弱围岩隧道超前支护体系加固机理研究[J]. 中国公路学报, 2025, 38(9): 255-267.
[14] 王明年, 张霄, 赵思光, 等. 软弱围岩隧道机械化全断面施工超前支护体系设计方法研究[J]. 铁道学报, 2020, 42(8): 146-154.
[15] 杨礼铠. 隧道软弱围岩大管棚小导管超前支护施工技术研究[J]. 工程技术研究, 2025, 10(23): 49-51.