低成本平衡压井液性能评价及关键影响因素研究
Research on Performance Evaluation and Key Influencing Factors of Low Cost Balanced Well Killing Fluid
DOI: 10.12677/jogt.2026.483054, PDF,   
作者: 漆国斌, 陈 伟:中国石油集团川庆钻探工程有限公司井下作业公司,陕西 西安;李子欣, 赵益霏*:陕西省油气田环境污染控制技术与储层保护重点实验室,陕西 西安
关键词: 低成本平衡压井液岩心渗透率滤失Low Cost Balanced Well Killing Fluid Core Permeability Fluid Loss
摘要: 为满足油气田低成本、高性能压井作业需求,以低成本平衡压井液为对象,系统开展了岩心渗透率与滤失量性能评价,并考察密度、温度、膨润土类型及稠化剂种类等关键因素的影响。结果表明,该压井液岩心渗透率损害率仅1.56%~14.73%,滤失量7.0~51.0 mL,综合性能良好,且较常规锌盐加重体系具有显著的成本优势。密度升高加剧渗透率损害,温度对滤失呈非线性调控作用。优选配方动塑比最高达1.61,密度可调范围1.5~1.7 g/cm3,具备良好剪切稀释性、悬浮稳定性和储层保护能力。本研究为低成本平衡压井液配方优化与现场应用提供了实验依据。
Abstract: To satisfy the demands of low-cost and high-performance well killing operations in oil and gas fields, a low-cost balanced well killing fluid was taken as the research subject. Systematic performance evaluations including core permeability and fluid loss were carried out, and the influences of key factors such as fluid density, temperature, bentonite type and thickener category were investigated. The experimental results reveal that the core permeability damage rate of the well killing fluid ranges from 1.56% to 14.73%, with fluid loss controlled between 7.0 mL and 51.0 mL, demonstrating good comprehensive performance with a significant cost advantage over conventional zinc-salt weighted systems. Increasing fluid density aggravates core permeability damage, while temperature exerts a nonlinear regulating effect on fluid loss. The optimized formulation achieves a maximum dynamic-plastic viscosity ratio of 1.61 with an adjustable density range of 1.5~1.7 g/cm3, and exhibits favorable shear thinning property, suspension stability and reservoir protection capacity. This study provides experimental support for formula optimization and field application of low-cost balanced well killing fluids.
文章引用:漆国斌, 陈伟, 李子欣, 赵益霏. 低成本平衡压井液性能评价及关键影响因素研究[J]. 石油天然气学报, 2026, 48(3): 500-507. https://doi.org/10.12677/jogt.2026.483054

参考文献

[1] 张绍槐, 罗平亚. 保护油气层技术[M]. 北京: 石油工业出版社, 2000.
[2] 吴方惠, 朱元华. CO2井高密度螯合压井液体系技术研究[J]. 复杂油气藏, 2026, 19(1): 32-38.
[3] 李志. 修井用压井液体系研制及现场应用[J]. 石油知识, 2025(6): 58-59.
[4] 王尚卫, 徐军, 李锋, 等. 低压气井修井用压井液体系研制与现场应用[J]. 精细石油化工, 2024, 41(5): 58-62.
[5] 司佳豪. 平衡压修井用高密度均相压井液的研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 西安: 西安石油大学, 2024.
[6] 张焊钰. 超深层高密度抗高温清洁压井液技术研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 北京: 中国石油大学(北京), 2024.
[7] 章志轩, 李方明, 焦蓉, 等. 涩北气田压井液工艺研究[J]. 当代化工, 2022, 51(6): 1431-1434+1438.
[8] 徐同台, 王平全. 钻井液与完井液新技术[M]. 北京: 石油工业出版社, 2019.
[9] Basfar, S., Shokry, A., Iqbal, A., Elkatatny, S. and Alajmi, S. (2025) Evaluation of the Effects of Kaolin Clay on the Performance of Barite-Weighted Oil-Based Drilling Fluid. ACS Omega, 10, 9976-9985.
https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.4c07376
[10] Erdogan, Y., Kok, O.E., Ozdemir, A. and Ozturk, S. (2025) Effect of Olivine, Barite and Calcium Carbonate on Cutting Carrying Capacity of Water-Based Drilling Fluids. Current Analytical Chemistry, 21, 1246-1251.
https://doi.org/10.2174/0115734110309877240812094622
[11] Ketegenov, T., Kamunur, K., Batkal, A., Gani, D. and Nadirov, R. (2022) Recent Advances in the Preparation of Barium Sulfate Nanoparticles: A Mini-Review. ChemEngineering, 6, Article No. 30.
https://doi.org/10.3390/chemengineering6020030
[12] 刘骁, 张盼盼, 张泉, 等. 置换法压井技术在延安气田井下作业中的应用[J]. 延安职业技术学院学报, 2020, 34(4): 106-108.
[13] GB/T 16783.1-2025, 石油天然气工业钻井液现场测试第1部分: 水基钻井液[S]. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2025.
[14] SY/T 5336-2006, 岩心分析方法[S]. 北京: 石油工业出版社, 2006.