健康风险视角下我国潜在返贫风险人群影响因素探索及预测研究——基于CHFS数据
Exploration and Prediction Study of Influencing Factors of the Population at Risk of Potential Return to Poverty in China under the Perspective of Health Risk—Based on CHFS Data
摘要: 目的:识别潜在返贫风险高危因素,精准识别潜在返贫风险家庭可以为潜在返贫风险人群的早期识别、超前干预提供理论依据。方法:基于中国家庭金融调查数据库2019年数据,利用相关性分析以及LASSO回归结合多因素Logistic回归识别潜在返贫危险因素,利用十折交叉验证训练Logistic回归和XGBoost模型,比较两模型对于潜在返贫风险家庭的预测效能。结果:相关性分析与LASSO回归筛选变量后纳入17个潜在风险变量,多因素Logistic回归显示潜在返贫风险与健康状况、资产、收入、教育、户籍类型、大病保险、政府帮扶、脱贫户等因素有关。Logistic模型的F1值为0.609、AUC值为0.734,XGBoost模型的F1值为0.943、AUC值为0.948,XGBoost模型预测效能优于Logistic回归,收入、脱贫户、政府帮扶、户籍、存款是对模型贡献度最高的五个变量。结论:XGBoost模型能较为准确地预测潜在返贫风险,该模型能早期识别潜在返贫风险人群,为相关部门实施早期干预提供理论依据,助力全面推进乡村振兴。
Abstract: Objective: To identify high-risk factors associated with the potential risk of return to poverty; accurately identifying households at such risk provides a theoretical basis for the early detection of—and proactive intervention for—the affected population. Methods: Based on data from the 2019 China Household Finance Survey, this study employed correlation analysis, LASSO regression, and multivariate logistic regression to identify risk factors. Ten-fold cross-validation was used to train logistic regression and XGBoost models, and their predictive performance regarding households at risk of return to poverty was compared. Results: Seventeen potential risk variables were selected for inclusion following correlation analysis and LASSO regression. Multivariate logistic regression indicated that the risk of return to poverty was associated with factors such as health status, assets, income, education, household registration type, critical illness insurance, government assistance, and status as a household that had previously escaped poverty. The logistic model yielded an F1 score of 0.609 and an AUC of 0.734, whereas the XGBoost model achieved an F1 score of 0.943 and an AUC of 0.948; the XGBoost model demonstrated superior predictive performance. Income, status as a household that had escaped poverty, government assistance, household registration type, and savings were the five variables contributing most significantly to the model. Conclusion: The XGBoost model can accurately predict the risk of return to poverty. It enables the early identification of at-risk populations, provides a theoretical basis for relevant authorities to implement early interventions, and supports the comprehensive advancement of rural revitalization.
文章引用:彭朋, 周艺林, 庞艳, 汪清雅. 健康风险视角下我国潜在返贫风险人群影响因素探索及预测研究——基于CHFS数据[J]. 统计学与应用, 2026, 15(9): 205-216. https://doi.org/10.12677/sa.2026.159219

参考文献

[1] World Bank (2020) Poverty and Shared Prosperity 2020: Reversals of Fortune. World Bank.
[2] 2025年分层分类社会救助体系不断完善[EB/OL].2026-01-02.
https://www.gov.cn/lianbo/202601/content_7053671.htm, 2026-07-07.
[3] 姜晓萍, 郑时彦. 乡村振兴中规模性返贫风险的发生机理与阻断机制[J]. 理论与改革, 2023(1): 130-142+168.
[4] 医保“三重保障”制度让我国因病返贫人数显著下降[EB/OL]. 2020-10-16.
http://www.xinhuanet.com/politics/2020-10/16/c_1126619621.htm, 2026-07-07.
[5] 中国公益研究院. 新发展阶段社会政策|两会代表共议慈善医疗救助的统筹与联合[EB/OL]. 2021-03-04.
https://www.bnu1.org/show_2241.html, 2026-07-07.
[6] Xu, L., Guo, M., Nicholas, S., Sun, L., Yang, F. and Wang, J. (2020) Disease Causing Poverty: Adapting the Onyx and Bullen Social Capital Measurement Tool for China. BMC Public Health, 20, Article No. 63.
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-020-8163-5
[7] 翟绍果. 健康贫困的协同治理: 逻辑、经验与路径[J]. 治理研究, 2018, 34(5): 53-60.
[8] 刘艳丽, 刘政. 互联网嵌入、社会资本与农村居民贫困脆弱性[J]. 云南财经大学学报, 2023, 39(8): 85-100.
[9] Jan, S., Laba, T., Essue, B.M., Gheorghe, A., Muhunthan, J., Engelgau, M., et al. (2018) Action to Address the Household Economic Burden of Non-Communicable Diseases. The Lancet, 391, 2047-2058.
https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(18)30323-4
[10] Jiang, Y., Huang, C., Yin, D., Liang, C. and Wang, Y. (2020) Constructing HLM to Examine Multi-Level Poverty-Contributing Factors of Farmer Households: Why and How? PLOS ONE, 15, e0228032.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0228032
[11] Sun, H., Li, X., Li, W. and Feng, J. (2022) Differences and Influencing Factors of Relative Poverty of Urban and Rural Residents in China Based on the Survey of 31 Provinces and Cities. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19, Article 9015.
https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19159015
[12] Bulthuis, S.E., Kok, M.C., Raven, J. and Dieleman, M.A. (2020) Factors Influencing the Scale-Up of Public Health Interventions in Low-and Middle-Income Countries: A Qualitative Systematic Literature Review. Health Policy and Planning, 35, 219-234.
https://doi.org/10.1093/heapol/czz140
[13] Sunil, K., Ranjan, P.J. and Bahadur, D.R. (2023) Can Rural Livelihood Programs Enhance Capabilities and Reduce Vulnerability to Poverty? Evidence from a Tribal Region of Eastern India. Economic Analysis and Policy, 77, 85-98.
[14] 张学敏, 史玲燕, 薛艳, 等. 乡村振兴视阈下返贫预警评价指标体系构建与实证[J]. 统计与决策, 2021(13): 58-62.
[15] 李泽峰, 左停, 林秋香. 推进乡村振兴过程中脱贫户防返贫预警工具构建——基于六个国家级脱贫县建档立卡数据的探索[J]. 农村经济, 2023(1): 53-62.
[16] Liu, M., Hu, S., Ge, Y., Heuvelink, G.B.M., Ren, Z. and Huang, X. (2021) Using Multiple Linear Regression and Random Forests to Identify Spatial Poverty Determinants in Rural China. Spatial Statistics, 42, Article 100461.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spasta.2020.100461
[17] Grueso, H. (2023) Unveiling the Causal Mechanisms within Multidimensional Poverty. Evaluation Review, 47, 1107-1134.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0193841x221140936
[18] 姚领, 谢家智. 贫困脆弱性的生成与测度: 基于风险“冲击-应对”的视角[J]. 统计研究, 2022, 39(11): 117-132.
[19] 国务院扶贫办: 坚持“一个收入、两个不愁、三个保障”综合性脱贫标准不动摇[EB/OL]. 2020-03-12.
https://m.gmw.cn/baijia/2020-03/12/33642368.html, 2026-07-07.
[20] 钱鹏博, 程维朝, 江洋. 脱贫农村家庭人均收入影响与返贫防控分析——以安徽省亳州市为例[J]. 中国集体经济, 2023(1): 1-5.
[21] 李壮壮, 龙莹. 新发展阶段农村多维贫困的识别与测度[J]. 华南农业大学学报(社会科学版), 2022, 21(2): 15-27.
[22] Wang, B., Shi, H., Wang, Z., Xu, S., Deng, N., Qiu, Y., et al. (2023) Pandemics Erode Poverty Alleviation Process: Impact on Productive Livelihood and Poverty Return. iScience, 26, Article 107177.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isci.2023.107177
[23] Lázár, A.N., Adams, H., Adger, W.N. and Nicholls, R.J. (2020) Modelling Household Well-Being and Poverty Trajectories: An Application to Coastal Bangladesh. PLOS ONE, 15, e0238621.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0238621
[24] Werner, L.K., Ludwig, J., Sie, A., Bagagnan, C.H., Zabré, P., Vandormael, A., et al. (2022) Health and Economic Benefits of Secondary Education in the Context of Poverty: Evidence from Burkina Faso. PLOS ONE, 17, e0270246.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0270246
[25] 王岚. 因教返贫与依教反贫: 乡村振兴背景下职业教育可持续性精准帮扶的困境与突破[J]. 黑龙江高教研究, 2024(3): 142-147.
[26] Yan, Z., Wang, J., Dong, Q., Zhu, L., Lin, W. and Jiang, X. (2022) XGBoost Algorithm and Logistic Regression to Predict the Postoperative 5-Year Outcome in Patients with Glioma. Annals of Translational Medicine, 10, 860.
https://doi.org/10.21037/atm-22-3384
[27] 颜兵倩. 基于logistic回归与XGBoost机器学习模型预测卒中相关性肺炎的对比研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 承德: 承德医学院, 2023.
[28] 张利斌, 吴宗文. 基于XGBoost机器学习模型的信用评分卡与基于逻辑回归模型的对比[J]. 中南民族大学学报(自然科学版), 2023, 42(6): 846-852.
[29] Ding, C., Guo, Y., Mo, Q. and Ma, J. (2022) Prediction Model of Postoperative Severe Hypocalcemia in Patients with Secondary Hyperparathyroidism Based on Logistic Regression and XGBoost Algorithm. Computational and Mathematical Methods in Medicine, 2022, 1-7.
https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/8752826
[30] Larsson, A., Berg, J., Gellerfors, M. and Gerdin Wärnberg, M. (2021) The Advanced Machine Learner XGBoost Did Not Reduce Prehospital Trauma Mistriage Compared with Logistic Regression: A Simulation Study. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, 21, Article No. 192.
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12911-021-01558-y
[31] 崔严尹, 许子英, 蔡义国, 等. 健康冲击对中老年人家庭致贫返贫的影响路径研究[J]. 卫生经济研究, 2023, 40(4): 43-47.
[32] Ma, Y., Xiang, Q., Yan, C., Liao, H. and Wang, J. (2022) Poverty Vulnerability and Health Risk Action Path of Families of Rural Elderly with Chronic Diseases: Empirical Analysis of 1,852 Families in Central and Western China. Frontiers in Public Health, 10, Article 776901.
https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2022.776901
[33] 金华宝, 伍科. 乡村振兴促进共同富裕的三重逻辑[J]. 理论与改革, 2022(5): 69-81.