子女同住对养老第三支柱建设的影响研究——基于CFPS 2022数据的实证分析
The Impact of Coresidence with Adult Children on the Development of the Third Pillar of Pension System—Empirical Evidence from CFPS 2022
摘要: 在人口老龄化与多层次养老保障体系改革的背景下,子女同住能否促进养老第三支柱发展,是积极应对老龄化战略的核心议题之一。本文利用中国家庭追踪调查(CFPS) 2022年数据,从金融参与视角探讨子女同住与养老第三支柱建设之间的关联及其作用机制。研究发现:子女同住与老年人持有风险金融资产的概率和金额呈显著负向关联;机制分析提示,子女同住可能通过抑制老年人互联网使用间接降低金融参与,揭示了“数字依赖”替代“数字反哺”的抑制性模式;子女经济支持未能转化为风险金融投资;年龄、教育和收入显著正向影响金融参与,男性参与意愿较低。上述发现表明,数字化背景下鼓励子女同住并不能自动提升老年人金融参与能力,政策应通过社区数字扫盲、适老化金融产品设计与家庭联合金融教育等方式,直接赋能老年群体的自主金融参与能力。
Abstract: Against the backdrop of population aging and the ongoing reform of China’s multi-tiered pension system, whether coresidence with adult children can promote the development of the third pillar of pension system has become a central issue in the strategy of actively responding to population aging. Using data from the China Family Panel Studies (CFPS) 2022, this paper investigates the association between intergenerational coresidence and the construction of the third pension pillar and its underlying mechanisms from the perspective of financial participation. The findings reveal that coresidence with adult children is significantly negatively associated with both the probability and the amount of risky financial asset holdings among older adults. Mediation analyses suggest that coresidence may indirectly reduce financial participation by suppressing internet use among older adults, revealing an inhibitory pattern wherein “digital dependence” substitutes for “digital back-feeding.” Furthermore, financial transfers from children to parents fail to translate into risky financial investment. Age, education, and income are significantly and positively associated with financial participation, while male older adults exhibit lower willingness to participate. These findings suggest that, in the digital era, encouraging coresidence alone cannot automatically enhance older adults’ financial engagement. Policy interventions should directly empower older adults’ autonomous financial participation through community-based digital literacy programs, age-friendly financial product design, and family-based joint financial education initiatives.
文章引用:李晓怡. 子女同住对养老第三支柱建设的影响研究——基于CFPS 2022数据的实证分析[J]. 社会科学前沿, 2026, 15(9): 501-510. https://doi.org/10.12677/ass.2026.159778

参考文献

[1] 中华人民共和国2024年国民经济和社会发展统计公报[R/OL]. 2025-02-28
https://www.neac.gov.cn/seac/c103544/202606/1190889.shtml, 2026-07-15.
[2] 国务院办公厅关于推动个人养老金发展的意见[EB/OL]. 2022-04-21.
https://www.gov.cn/gongbao/content/2022/content_5688780.htm, 2026-07-15.
[3] 何圆, 钱雨婷, 王伊攀. 子女同住对养老第三支柱建设的影响研究——基于CFPS的经验证据[J]. 南方经济, 2023(1): 49-65.
[4] 靳永爱, 周峰, 翟振武. 居住方式对老年人心理健康的影响——社区环境的调节作用[J]. 人口学刊, 2017, 39(3): 66-77.
[5] 卢洪友, 余锦亮, 杜亦譞. 老年父母照料家庭与成年子女劳动供给——基于CFPS微观数据的分析[J]. 财经研究, 2017, 43(12): 4-16.
[6] 张川川, 陈斌开. “社会养老”能否替代“家庭养老”?——来自中国新型农村社会养老保险的证据[J]. 经济研究, 2014, 49(11): 102-115.
[7] 刘一伟. 互补还是替代: “社会养老”与“家庭养老”——基于城乡差异的分析视角[J]. 公共管理学报, 2016, 13(4): 77-88+156.
[8] 汤凌霄, 潘文东. 隔代照料对家庭金融资产配置的影响——基于CHFS数据的实证分析[J]. 消费经济, 2021, 37(1): 39-49.
[9] 卢亚娟, 孟丹丹, 刘澍. 农村家庭结构对金融资产选择的影响分析[J]. 财贸研究, 2019, 30(6): 61-73.
[10] 穆怀中. 家庭子女养老与个人养老“互补替代”效应: 理论与实证[J]. 社会科学文摘, 2022(6): 87-89.
[11] Guo, N., Huang, W. and Wang, R. (2025) Public Pensions and Family Dynamics: Eldercare, Child Investment, and Son Preference in Rural China. Journal of Development Economics, 172, Article ID: 103390.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdeveco.2024.103390
[12] Feng, C., Zhang, Y., Yang, L., Wu, L. and Liu, B. (2025) How Do Children’s Cohabitation and Family Asset Reserves Impact Rural Individuals’ Participation in Commercial Pension Insurance? Frontiers in Public Health, 13, Article ID: 1548241.
https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2025.1548241
[13] 邓婷鹤, 何秀荣, 王佳友. 居住模式对老人福利的影响: 基于代际关系的视角——来自我国老人膳食质量的证据[J]. 财经研究, 2016, 42(12): 39-48.
[14] 余央央, 陈杰. 子女近邻而居, 胜于同一屋檐?——居住安排与中国农村老年人认知健康[J]. 财经研究, 2020, 46(8): 49-63+155.