马克思主义社会观视域下积极老龄化的社会建构与实践路径研究
Research on the Social Construction and Practical Pathways of Active Aging from the Perspective of Marxist View of Society
摘要: 人口老龄化是我国的基本国情,但长期被置于“负担”的话语框架中,其作为社会历史过程的本质因而被遮蔽。以马克思主义社会观为理论基础,批判传统老龄化研究将老年人口预设为“社会负担”的意识形态性质,并从观念转型、制度建构、实践整合三个维度探讨积极老龄化的实现路径。研究发现:老龄化被感知为“问题”的根源不在于老年人口规模扩大,而在于现有社会关系结构缺乏容纳庞大老年人口的弹性;老年人被视为“负担”还是“资源”,取决于特定历史阶段的生产方式和分配方式。积极老龄化的本质是一场深层的社会建构,目标是推动老龄化话语从“社会负担”向“社会资源”的范式转换,提升老年人的社会主体性。在“未富先老”的国情下,构建中国自主的老龄化知识体系,将积极老龄化的社会建构与中国式现代化探索有机结合。
Abstract: Population aging is a fundamental national condition of China, yet it has long been framed within a discourse of “burden”, which obscures its essential nature as a socio-historical process. Grounded in the Marxist view of society, this study critically examines the ideological underpinnings of traditional aging research that presumes the elderly population as a “social burden”, and explores the pathways to active aging from three dimensions: conceptual transformation, institutional construction, and practical integration. The findings reveal that the perception of aging as a “problem” does not originate from the expansion of the elderly population per se, but from the lack of flexibility in existing social relational structures to accommodate such a population. Whether the elderly are perceived as a “burden” or a “resource” depends on the modes of production and distribution at specific historical stages. The essence of active aging lies in a deep process of social construction aimed at facilitating a paradigm shift in aging discourse from “social burden” to “social resource”, thereby enhancing the social subjectivity of the elderly. Under the national condition of “getting old before getting rich”, it is necessary to construct an indigenous Chinese knowledge system on aging and organically integrate the social construction of active aging with the exploration of Chinese-style modernization.
参考文献
|
[1]
|
王萍萍: 2025年全国人口总量为140489万人 人口高质量发展持续推进[EB/OL]. 2026-01-19. https://www.stats.gov.cn/xxgk/jd/sjjd2020/202601/t20260119_1962338.html, 2026-06-06.
|
|
[2]
|
马瑞丽. 积极老龄化的理念与路径[N]. 中国社会科学报, 2023-12-29(A06).
|
|
[3]
|
付才辉, 卓唯佳, 林毅夫. 构建中国式老龄化自主知识体系探索[J]. 社会科学辑刊, 2026(1): 32-44.
|
|
[4]
|
韩鹏. 关于老年人收入的政治经济学分析[J]. 马克思主义研究, 2018(11): 88-95.
|
|
[5]
|
马克思. 资本论: 第1卷[M]//马克思恩格斯文集: 第5卷. 北京: 人民出版社, 2009: 89.
|
|
[6]
|
牟成文, 王韦君. 马克思关于作为制度性贫困的无产阶级贫困思想[J]. 当代世界与社会主义, 2025(1): 66-73.
|
|
[7]
|
王伟进, 陆杰华. 老龄社会及其治理面临的认知挑战与应对[J]. 北京行政学院学报, 2025(2): 98-108.
|
|
[8]
|
杨敏, 严天欣. 老年身份话语的困境与出路——从二元对立到主体间性[J]. 中国人民大学学报, 2025, 39(3): 144-152.
|
|
[9]
|
范世明. 应对人口老龄化需要实现“四个转向” [J]. 中国社会保障, 2025(2): 44-45.
|
|
[10]
|
矫冬梅. 可行能力框架下老年人发展观及其对我国积极老龄化政策的启示[J]. 决策与信息, 2026(3): 80-88.
|
|
[11]
|
马克思. 关于费尔巴哈的提纲[M]//马克思恩格斯文集: 第1卷. 北京: 人民出版社, 2009: 501.
|
|
[12]
|
李海洋, 韦弋昌. 马克思人口理论视域下积极应对人口老龄化战略: 缘起、脉络与中国化[J]. 昆明学院学报, 2025, 47(5): 70-79.
|
|
[13]
|
黄胜伟. 推动“十五五”老龄事业高质量发展[N]. 中国社会报, 2025-12-29(A02).
|