数字赋能与多元协同:社区智慧养老应急服务的运行机制与实践路径
Digital Empowerment and Multi-Agent Collaboration: Operational Mechanisms and Practical Pathways of Community Smart Emergency Services for the Elderly
摘要: 我国人口老龄化持续深化,城市老旧社区独居老人居家安全风险凸显,传统行政主导的应急服务存在响应链条长、资源碎片化等局限。本文以贵阳市“贵人守护”平台为案例,依托TOE理论框架,从技术、组织、环境三维度剖析社区智慧养老应急服务的运行机制。研究发现,该服务体现为技术创新、人才资源与环境约束的三维耦合:技术维度通过智能终端与数据平台实现从被动响应向主动预警转型;组织维度以退役军人队伍为核心,构建多元主体协同的医养救服一体化体系;环境维度受地理约束、政策支持与技术支撑共同塑造。研究同时揭示,当前面临技术适老化不足、协同碎片化、数字鸿沟显著等困境。据此提出优化路径:技术提质需深化适老化改造与预测性应急能力;组织聚力需完善社会化协同网络与多元筹资机制;环境赋能需弥合数字鸿沟与培育可持续服务生态。本文拓展了TOE理论在民生保障领域的应用,为西南山地城市及同类地区提供了可复制经验。
Abstract: China’s deepening population aging has heightened home safety risks for elderly individuals living alone in urban aging communities. Traditional administratively-led emergency services are constrained by lengthy response chains and fragmented resources. Drawing on the Technology-Organization-Environment (TOE) framework, this study examines Guiyang’s “Guiren Shouhu” platform to analyze the operational mechanisms of community smart elderly care emergency services. Findings reveal a three-dimensional coupling of technological innovation, human resources, and environmental constraints: intelligent terminals and data platforms enable the shift from passive response to proactive early warning; veteran-centered teams construct an integrated medical-nursing-rescue-service system through multi-stakeholder collaboration; and geographical constraints, policy support, and digital infrastructure collectively shape service delivery. The study identifies predicaments including inadequate technological age-friendliness, fragmented collaboration, and pronounced digital divides. Optimization pathways are proposed: deepening age-friendly transformation and predictive capabilities; improving socialized collaboration networks and diversified financing; and bridging digital divides to cultivate sustainable service ecosystems. This paper extends TOE theory to public welfare, offering replicable experience for southwestern mountainous cities and similar regions.
文章引用:杨营焱. 数字赋能与多元协同:社区智慧养老应急服务的运行机制与实践路径[J]. 老龄化研究, 2026, 13(9): 344-351. https://doi.org/10.12677/ar.2026.139665

参考文献

[1] 中华人民共和国2025年国民经济和社会发展统计公报[EB/OL]. 2026-02-28.
https://www.stats.gov.cn/sj/zxfb/202602/t20260228_1962662.html, 2026-05-22.
[2] 张继政, 尹艺蓉. 协同治理视角下单位制社区嵌入式养老的“角色-资源-权力”协同机制研究——以济宁市公路家园社区为例[J]. 公关世界, 2026(3): 164-166.
[3] 杨博文, 毛春合. 社会生态系统视域下政府推动社区居家养老服务多元协同供给的创新路径[J]. 老龄科学研究, 2025, 13(12): 24-33.
[4] 史柏年. 老人社区照顾的发展与策略[J]. 中国青年政治学院学报, 1997, 16(1): 101-104.
[5] 王文俊. 人口老龄化背景下社区居家养老问题研究——以南宁市为例[J]. 行政与法, 2016(10): 58-66.
[6] 王新建, 胡广伟, 司文峰, 等. 数字环境下社区养老精准化服务价值网络构建——基于政策文本内容的分析[J]. 情报科学, 2024, 42(7): 10-22.
[7] 左美云, 于越. 智慧养老的现状、问题与趋势[J]. 科技与金融, 2023(7): 11-15.
[8] 齐爱琴. 国内智慧养老文献综述[J]. 科技视界, 2017(7): 272-273.
[9] Suryadevara, N.K., Mukhopadhyay, S.C., Wang, R. and Rayudu, R.K. (2013) Forecasting the Behavior of an Elderly Using Wireless Sensors Data in a Smart Home. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 26, 2641-2652.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engappai.2013.08.004
[10] van Vuuren, J., Thomas, B., Agarwal, G., et al. (2021) Reshaping Healthcare Delivery for Elderly Patients: The Role of Community Paramedicine; A Systematic Review. BMC Health Services Research, 21, Article No. 29.
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-020-06037-0
[11] Nimrod, G. (2020) Aging Well in the Digital Age: Technology in Processes of Selective Optimization with Compensation. The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, 75, 2008-2017.
https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gbz111
[12] Verhoest, K. and Mattei, P. (2010) Special Issue on ‘Welfare governance reforms and effects in the Post-Golden Age’. Public Management Review, 12, 163-171.
[13] 韩烨. 加快长期护理保险在农村试点, 破解农村养老困局[J]. 中国人力资源社会保障, 2025(4): 63.
[14] Tornatzky, L.G., Fleischer, M. and Chakrabarti, A. (1990) Process of Technological Innovation. Lexington Books, 1-20.
[15] 廖爱娣, 杨婷婷. TOE框架下智慧养老服务水平提升路径研究——基于31个省区市的模糊集定性比较分析[J]. 江汉学术, 2025, 44(6): 33-46.
[16] 余沛林, 徐强. 数字技术嵌入农村智慧养老的现实困境与优化路径——基于TOE理论框架的视角[J]. 农业科技与信息, 2026(1): 142-147.
[17] 张成岗, 宁学斯. 基层社区智慧养老的生成逻辑及实践路径——基于TOE框架的案例探索[J]. 公共管理学报, 2025, 22(3): 89-101, 171.
[18] 王宁. 代表性还是典型性?——个案的属性与个案研究方法的逻辑基础[J]. 社会学研究, 2002(5): 123-125.