延迟退休背景下超龄劳动者权益保障困境与破解路径
Rights Dilemmas of Over-Age Workers and Social Governance Pathways in an Aging Society
DOI: 10.12677/ar.2026.139678, PDF,   
作者: 蔡义瑕:贵州大学法学院,贵州 贵阳
关键词: 超龄劳动者积极老龄化劳动权益Over-Age Workers Active Aging Labor Rights and Interests
摘要: 随着我国人口老龄化程度持续加深与延迟退休政策落地推进,超龄劳动者群体规模不断扩大,其权益保护已成为解决的重要社会议题。本文以超龄劳动者的权益维护为研究核心,系统梳理超龄劳动者权益维护的现实依据与理论依据,深入剖析其在就业权、核心劳动权益、社会保障及权利救济四个维度面临的突出困境,最终从优化就业环境、强化劳动权益保护、健全社会保障体系、构建多元纠纷解决机制四个方面,提出针对性的维护路径。研究表明,超龄劳动者劳动权益维护具备坚实的现实需求与理论支撑,当前其权益保障面临就业歧视突出、核心权益受损、社保衔接不畅、救济机制失灵等多重难题,需通过政策引导、制度完善、监管强化与机制创新,构建全方位的权益保护体系。
Abstract: As China’s population aging intensifies and the delayed retirement policy is implemented, the number of over-age workers continues to grow, making the protection of their rights and interests a critical social issue. This paper focuses on the safeguarding of over-age workers’ rights, systematically reviewing the practical and theoretical foundations for their protection. It delves into the prominent challenges they face across four key dimensions: employment rights, core labor rights, social security, and right remedies. Subsequently, the paper proposes targeted solutions focusing on four areas: optimizing the employment environment, strengthening the protection of labor rights, improving the social security system, and establishing a diversified dispute resolution mechanism. The study concludes that safeguarding the labor rights of over-age workers is supported by strong practical needs and theoretical supports. However, their current rights protection faces multiple difficulties, including significant employment discrimination, infringement of core rights, inadequate social security coordination, and ineffective remedy mechanisms. Therefore, it is essential to build a comprehensive rights protection system through policy guidance, institutional improvement, enhanced supervision, and mechanism innovation.
文章引用:蔡义瑕. 延迟退休背景下超龄劳动者权益保障困境与破解路径[J]. 老龄化研究, 2026, 13(9): 439-445. https://doi.org/10.12677/ar.2026.139678

参考文献

[1] 胡晓东. 超龄劳动者的劳动权益保障研究[J]. 北京劳动保障职业学院学报, 2025, 19(4): 10-15.
[2] 彭红艳, 王海燕. 超龄劳动者权益保障与工会作为[J]. 天津市工会管理干部学院学报, 2025, 42(4): 46-53.
[3] 王天玉. 劳动关系认定标准的法理[J]. 中国应用法学, 2025(2): 40-50.
[4] 丁英顺. 日本促进高龄劳动者就业的经验启示[J]. 人民论坛, 2021(17): 89-93.
[5] 徐洁, 燕颖川. 算法年龄歧视的现实挑战与规制路径[J]. 学术交流, 2023(7): 134-155.
[6] 程龙. 超龄劳动者退出劳动给付认定规则研究[J]. 宜宾学院学报, 2026, 26(1): 78-89.
[7] 邹爱华, 黄冠. 超龄劳动者保护的利益衡量与规则重塑[J]. 温州大学学报(社会科学版), 2024, 37(5): 17-27.
[8] 冯彦君, 顾男飞. 积极老龄化战略的劳动法实现机制[J]. 理论与改革, 2024(2): 140-153.
[9] 杨菊华, 闫紫菊. 老有所为: 中国老龄人力资源开发利用的理论逻辑与实现路径[J]. 河北大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2026, 51(2): 36-48.
[10] 薛长礼. 渐进式延迟法定退休年龄背景下高龄劳动者的就业权利保障[J]. 人口研究, 2025, 49(5): 52-61.
[11] 李静, 王小凤. “积极”何以可能? 健康, 保障与退休老年人的社会参与困境[J]. 人口与社会, 2025, 41(6): 1-12.
[12] 孟现玉. 延迟退休背景下职工基本养老保险制度的调整界限与路径[J]. 保险研究, 2025(10): 70-81.