数智时代教师身份认同的研究脉络与演进趋势——基于中外核心文献的系统性回顾
Research Trajectories and Trends of Teacher Identity in the Digital Age—A Systematic Review of Core Chinese and International Literature
DOI: 10.12677/ces.2026.149720, PDF,    科研立项经费支持
作者: 吴非凡:绍兴大学外国语学院,浙江 绍兴
关键词: 数智时代教师身份认同人工智能CiteSpaceDigital Age Teacher Identity Artificial Intelligence CiteSpace
摘要: 随着人工智能技术越来越多地融入教育教学,教师传统的角色定位受到冲击,数智时代教师身份认同问题日益凸显。本研究基于CNKI与WOS核心数据库(2015~2026),采用系统性文献回顾(Systematic Review)方法,并辅助以CiteSpace进行主题聚类,分析了国内外教师数智时代身份认同的研究脉络与趋势。研究发现,国内外相关研究最初关注身份危机以及技术适配,转向对教师内在心理与教学观念的探讨,再发展为目前人机协同环境下身份重构与互动关系重建的演变过程。数字化转型促使教师不断重构专业角色。教师不仅是教学内容的设计者,更是人机协同环境下,通过具体教学决策与行为调整,实现算法反馈与师生情感共鸣相平衡的关键主体。基于此,本文提出,未来研究应超越宽泛的理论探讨,通过真实的课堂人机分工实证、基于情感视角的叙事研究,以及针对本土政策驱动环境的中长期追踪,将抽象的身份认同研究转化为具体的教师发展与支持路径。
Abstract: With the increasing integration of artificial intelligence into education and teaching, the traditional role positioning of teachers has been challenged, making the issue of teachers’ identity in the digital age increasingly prominent. Based on the CNKI and WOS core databases (2015~2026), this study employed a systematic literature review method, supplemented by CiteSpace for thematic clustering to analyze the research trajectories and trends of teachers’ identity in the digital age domestically and internationally. The findings reveal an evolutionary process in related research: it initially focused on identity crises and technological adaptation, then shifted toward the exploration of teachers’ internal psychology and teaching beliefs, and has now developed into the reconstruction of identity and interactive relationships within human-machine collaborative environments. Digital transformation compels teachers to continuously reconstruct their professional roles. Teachers are not only the designers of teaching content, but also the key agents capable of achieving a balance between algorithmic feedback and teacher-student emotional resonance through specific teaching decisions and behavioral adjustments in human-machine collaborative environments. Based on this, this paper proposes that future research should move beyond broad theoretical discussions, and transform abstract identity research into specific teacher development and support pathways through empirical investigations of human-machine division of labor in real classrooms, narrative research from an emotional perspective, and longitudinal tracking within local policy-driven environments.
文章引用:吴非凡. 数智时代教师身份认同的研究脉络与演进趋势——基于中外核心文献的系统性回顾[J]. 创新教育研究, 2026, 14(9): 565-576. https://doi.org/10.12677/ces.2026.149720

参考文献

[1] 教师数字素养: JY/T 0646-2022 [S/OL].
http://www.moe.gov.cn/srcsite/A16/s3342/202302/W020230214594527529113.pdf, 2022-11-30.
[2] 段俊吉. 教师身份的数字流动及其认同建构[J]. 中国远程教育, 2025, 45(6): 111-125.
[3] 周东. 人工智能时代教师的身份镜像: 困境与建构[J]. 中国远程教育, 2024, 44(4): 81-93.
[4] 张家军, 王美潔. 智能时代的教师身份认同: 内涵、危机与应对[J]. 当代教育科学, 2024(9): 3-12.
[5] Beijaard, D., Meijer, P.C. and Verloop, N. (2004) Reconsidering Research on Teachers’ Professional Identity. Teaching and Teacher Education, 20, 107-128.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2003.07.001
[6] Samuel, M. and Stephens, D. (2000) Critical Dialogues with Self: Developing Teacher Identities and Roles—A Case Study of South African Student Teachers. International Journal of Educational Research, 33, 475-491.
https://doi.org/10.1016/s0883-0355(00)00030-6
[7] 傅蝶, 李凯. 教育数字化转型背景下的职教教师身份认同[J]. 中国职业技术教育, 2024(33): 3-10+23.
[8] 徐兴子. 人工智能时代教师专业身份认同的挑战与突围[J]. 教育科学研究, 2023(4): 19-25.
[9] 张曦琳. 智能时代高校教师的身份危机及其重塑[J]. 现代教育技术, 2020, 30(11): 5-11.
[10] 罗莎莎, 靳玉乐. 智能时代教师角色的危机、成因及其应对——基于场景理论的视角[J]. 教师教育研究, 2020, 32(3): 53-59.
[11] 许悦婷, 古玥. 人工智能时代的外语教学与外语教师专业发展: 挑战、身份认同危机与出路[J]. 当代外语研究, 2025(1): 60-72.
[12] 杨国良, 蔡其勇. 数智时代教师专业身份认同危机的显现与消解[J]. 教育研究, 2025, 46(12): 139-150.
[13] 邹杨, 陈杰. 人工智能赋能背景下高校英语教师身份认同研究[J]. 现代英语, 2025(22): 82-84.
[14] 吕寒雪. 人机协同教学中教师身份认同的情感理路与提升路径: 一个情感社会学的解读[J]. 电化教育研究, 2023, 44(12): 108-115.
[15] 卢晓中, 王雨. 教师身份认同及其提升[J]. 高等教育研究, 2020, 41(12): 58-66.
[16] 庄海玲. 人工智能时代大学英语教师角色重塑与发展路径研究[J]. 语言与文化研究, 2025, 33(6): 68-71.
[17] 余胜泉. 人工智能教师的未来角色[J]. 开放教育研究, 2018, 24(1): 16-28.
[18] 王超, 田小红. 人工智能时代的教师专业身份: 挑战与建构[J]. 教师教育学报, 2021, 8(2): 66-75.
[19] 陈敏, 杨会云, 周驰. AI教育建构者: 智能时代教师角色转型与能力重构[J]. 远程教育杂志, 2025, 43(6): 33-40+51.
[20] Wang, H., Cui, Y. and Fang, H. (2026) Identity Tensions of EFL Teachers in Navigating Genai‐Empowered Language Teaching: A Case Study of Two Secondary School Teachers in China. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 36, 2648-2659.
https://doi.org/10.1111/ijal.70106
[21] Kim, S. and Brutt-Griffler, J. (2026) Professional Identity Development of Pre-Service English Teachers in the Era of Artificial Intelligence. Journal of Language, Identity & Education, 1-18.
https://doi.org/10.1080/15348458.2026.2627369
[22] Lutovac, S., Keränen, V., Körkkö, M., Uitto, M. and Clandinin, D.J. (2024) Teachers’ Experiences of Being Unsettled within Their Relationships with Parents: Shifting Professional Knowledge Landscapes. Teaching and Teacher Education, 152, Article 104790.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2024.104790
[23] Lee, J.H., Hwang, Y. and Lee, S. (2026) Genai-Mediated Activity Theory (GMAT) for L2 Teachers. Language Learning & Technology, 30, 1-21.
https://doi.org/10.64152/10125/73675
[24] Zhang, Y., Lai, C. and Gu, M.M.Y. (2025) Becoming a Teacher in the Era of AI: A Multiple-Case Study of Pre-Service Teachers’ Investment in AI-Facilitated Learning-to-Teach Practices. System, 133, Article 103746.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2025.103746
[25] Syahruddin, and Agus, M. (2026) Critical Digital Literacy for Teachers: Evaluating Pedagogical Models, Support Systems, and Policy Implications in a Hybrid Learning Era. Teaching and Teacher Education, 175, Article 105437.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2026.105437
[26] Wang, Y. and Zhang, H. (2026) (Re)Constructing English as a Foreign Language (EFL) Tutor Identity in the Age of Artificial Intelligence: Insights from China’s Shadow Education. European Journal of Education, 61, e70651.
https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.70651
[27] Ghiasvand, F. and Seyri, H. (2025) A Collaborative Reflection on the Synergy of Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Language Teacher Identity Reconstruction. Teaching and Teacher Education, 160, Article 105022.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2025.105022
[28] Lehtinen, A., Kostiainen, E., Martin, A. and Näykki, P. (2024) Pre-Service Teachers Co-Constructing Narratives about the Future of Education. European Journal of Teacher Education, 1-23.
https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2024.2393329
[29] Kwihangana, F. (2024) Teacher Positioning in Educational ICT Policies: Implications for Digital Teacher Identity Development in Under-Resourced Contexts. Journal of Education Policy, 40, 242-265.
https://doi.org/10.1080/02680939.2024.2386309
[30] Chen, Y., Mei, H. and Shu, D. (2026) Unpacking Identity Tensions and Agency of Translation and Interpreting Teachers: A Case Study in China. International Journal of Applied Linguistics.
https://doi.org/10.1111/ijal.70242
[31] Kim, K. and Kwon, K. (2025) Unveiling Teacher Identity Development: A Case Study of AI Curriculum Implementation in a Rural Middle School Computer Science Class. Teaching and Teacher Education, 160, Article 105032.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2025.105032
[32] Su, Y. (2023) Delving into EFL Teachers’ Digital Literacy and Professional Identity in the Pandemic Era: Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK) Framework. Heliyon, 9, e16361.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e16361
[33] Tsou, W., Lin, A.M.Y. and Chen, F. (2024) Language, Culture and Curriculum, 37, 529-543.
https://doi.org/10.1080/07908318.2024.2362326
[34] Gu, M.M. and Lai, C. (2019) An Ethical Analysis of How ESL Teachers Construct Their Professional Identities through the Use of Information Technology in Teaching. British Educational Research Journal, 45, 918-937.
https://doi.org/10.1002/berj.3531
[35] Trevisan, O. (2024) Teacher Digital Identity Divergences: From Teacher Education to Classroom. British Educational Research Journal, 50, 2519-2541.
https://doi.org/10.1002/berj.4041
[36] Wright, W.T. (2023) Digital Remix as a Pedagogical Platform Intervention. Learning, Media and Technology, 50, 276-289.
https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2023.2290511
[37] 教育部关于印发《教育信息化2.0行动计划》的通知[EB/OL].
http://www.moe.gov.cn/srcsite/A16/s3342/201804/t20180425_334188.html, 2018-04-13.
[38] Priestley, M., Biesta, G. and Robinson, S. (2015) Teacher Agency. In: Evers, J. and Kneyber, R., Eds., Flip the System, Routledge, 134-148.
https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315678573-15
[39] Selwyn, N. (2016) Is Technology Good for Education? Polity Press.
[40] Christensen, M.K., Nielsen, K.S. and O’Neill, L.D. (2022) Embodied Teacher Identity: A Qualitative Study on ‘Practical Sense’ as a Basic Pedagogical Condition in Times of COVID-19. Advances in Health Sciences Education, 27, 577-603.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-022-10102-0