数智时代的“慢成长”:小学生审辨思维培养的“守拙”路径
Slow Growth in the Digital Intelligence Era: A Down-to-Earth Approach to Cultivating Primary School Students’ Critical Thinking
摘要: 生成式AI深度嵌入基础教育,使技术的极速供给与学生思维的缓慢建构形成矛盾。AI的即时反馈虽然提升了知识获取效率,却使小学生面临认知外包、思维惰化与质疑弱化的风险。本研究基于杜威反思性思维,结合小学生从具体运算向形式运算过渡的认知特征,将审辨思维界定为观察与直觉质疑、直观分析与比较、初步整合与表达、结果性回顾与调整四个递进维度,提出“数智时代的慢成长”这一核心命题,以杜威反思性思维的时间性、审辨思维的可教性及学历案的过程性为学理根基,并引入“守拙”教育哲学作为价值锚点。本文据此提出四条培养路径:教学设计创设“慢时空”;角色重构构建“师–生–智”协同模式;任务驱动设计生活化“慢实践”情境;评价改革建立多维增值体系。研究认为,教育应善用技术并守住学生思维的主体性,以“慢”御“快”,让儿童先成为拥有独立思考习惯的思考者,再成长为能够驾驭AI的学习者。
Abstract: The deep integration of generative artificial intelligence into basic education has given rise to a contradiction between the rapid provision of technological resources and the gradual construction of students’ thinking. Although instant feedback offered by AI boosts the efficiency of knowledge acquisition, it exposes primary school students to hazards such as cognitive outsourcing, intellectual inertia and weakened willingness to question. Based on Dewey’s reflective thinking theory and the cognitive trait of primary school students transitioning from concrete operational thought to formal operational thought, this study divides critical thinking into four progressive dimensions: observation and intuitive inquiry, intuitive analysis and comparison, preliminary integration and expression, and outcome-oriented review and adjustment. This paper proposes the core proposition of “unhurried growth in the digital intelligence era”. Its theoretical underpinnings include the temporality of Dewey’s reflective thinking, the teachability of critical thinking and the procedural attribute of learning plans, with the educational philosophy of “upholding unpretentious simplicity” taken as its value anchor. Accordingly, four cultivation strategies are put forward: constructing unhurried learning time and space through instructional design; restructuring stakeholder roles to build a collaborative teacher-student-AI model; designing life-based unhurried practical scenarios via task-driven teaching; and advancing assessment reform to establish a multi-dimensional value-added evaluation system. This study holds that education should make proper use of technology while preserving the subjectivity of students’ thinking. By counteracting technological haste with educational slowness, children can first grow into independent thinkers with established habits of reflective thought, and then become competent learners who are able to command artificial intelligence.
文章引用:黄柯, 郭淼鑫. 数智时代的“慢成长”:小学生审辨思维培养的“守拙”路径[J]. 教育进展, 2026, 16(9): 1570-1578. https://doi.org/10.12677/ae.2026.1692057

参考文献

[1] 刘三女牙, 郝晓晗. 生成式人工智能助力教育创新的挑战与进路[J]. 清华大学教育研究, 2024, 45(3): 1-12.
[2] 陈本皓. 人机协同下的AI风险链: 认知外包、能力空心化、深度思维僵化[J]. 广西大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2025, 47(5): 194-204.
[3] 贺斌, 徐莹, 刘烨. 生成式人工智能对学生高阶思维影响的元分析[J]. 黑龙江高教研究, 2026, 44(6): 152-160.
[4] 施澜, 余璇然, 陈诗羽, 等. 生成式人工智能是否有助于提升学生的高阶思维?——基于对60节课堂实录的分析[J]. 开放教育研究, 2026, 32(3): 108-120.
[5] 马香莲, 陈正浩. 迟钝的自由: 人工智能时代“守拙”教育哲学的价值意蕴[J]. 教育理论与实践, 2026(16): 3-12.
[6] Sweller, J. (1988) Cognitive Load during Problem Solving: Effects on Learning. Cognitive Science, 12, 257-285.
https://doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog1202_4
[7] Bjork, R.A. (1994) Memory and Metamemory Considerations in the Training of Human Beings. In: Metcalfe, J. and Shimamura, A., Metacognition: Knowing about Knowing, MIT Press, 185-205.
https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/4561.003.0011
[8] Dewey, J. (1910) How We Think. D.C. Heath & Co.
[9] 马利红, 魏锐, 刘坚, 等. 审辨思维: 21世纪核心素养5C模型之二[J]. 华东师范大学学报(教育科学版), 2020, 38(2): 45-56.
[10] 唐瑜君, 宋乃庆, 蔡金法. 小学生批判性思维倾向与问题提出表现的现状及相关性研究[J]. 数学教育学报, 2023, 32(5): 35-41.
[11] 徐傲雪. ChatGPT类产品在初等教育领域的应用价值及潜在风险[J]. 新课程导学, 2023(29): 44-48.
[12] 魏锐, 刘坚, 白新文, 等. “21世纪核心素养5C模型”研究设计[J]. 华东师范大学学报(教育科学版), 2020, 38(2): 20-28.
[13] 崔允漷. 学历案: 学生立场的教案变革[N]. 中国教育报, 2016-06-09(006).
[14] Vygotsky, L.S., Cole, M., John-Steiner, V., Scribner, S. and Souberman, E. (1978) Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Harvard University Press.
[15] 刘怀亚, 贾积有. 生成式人工智能促进学生高阶思维发展的内在机制和教学建议——基于IRIT模型的构建[J]. 北京教育学院学报, 2026, 40(2): 81-87.
[16] 林崇德, 胡卫平. 思维型课堂教学的理论与实践[J]. 北京师范大学学报(社会科学版), 2010(1): 29-36.
[17] 李海峰, 王炜. 人机争论探究法: 一种争论式智能会话机器人支持的学生高阶思维能力培养模式探索[J]. 电化教育研究, 2024, 45(3): 106-112+128.
[18] 杨晓哲, 舒薇澄. 人工智能介入课堂教学的边界审视[J]. 北京教育学院学报, 2026, 40(2): 1-6.
[19] 李琳, 张洁. 指向创造性成长的儿童审辩式思维培养——基于小学道德与法治教学的省思[J]. 教育研究与评论, 2024(6): 45-53.
[20] 李慧. 真实任务驱动: 审辩式思维培养的课堂生态建构与实践——以“面积单位”教学为例[J]. 教育科学论坛, 2026(11): 41-43.
[21] 孙婧, 骆婧雅, 王颖. 人工智能时代反思教学的本质——基于批判教育学的视角[J]. 中国电化教育, 2020(6): 16-21.