考虑制造商竞争的平台销售模式均衡决策研究
Equilibrium Decision-Making of Platform Sales Strategies under Manufacturer Competition
摘要: 在平台经济快速发展与制造商渠道竞争日趋激烈的现实背景下,针对一方自建平台直销、另一方依托第三方平台合作的不对称竞争供应链,本文构建由两个替代制造商与一个电商平台组成的Stackelberg博弈模型,分别求解转售、寄售、混合三种销售模式下的均衡价格、批发价格与成员最优利润,并开展潜在市场规模、渠道弹性、佣金费率的单因素敏感性分析。研究结果表明:制造商B的均衡决策受关键参数显著驱动,转售模式利润稳定但定价权受限,寄售模式灵活但对佣金敏感,混合模式在竞争加剧环境下更具优势;潜在市场规模扩大有利于直销制造商而挤压合作制造商利润,渠道弹性提升可通过“以量补价”提升整体供应链收益,佣金费率则对寄售与混合模式产生非线性影响并存在明显阈值效应。本文完善了竞争场景下平台销售模式的均衡理论,可为制造商渠道策略选择与电商平台佣金机制设计提供决策参考。
Abstract: Against the practical backdrop of the rapid development of the platform economy and increasingly fierce channel competition among manufacturers, this paper considers an asymmetric competitive supply chain in which one manufacturer builds its own direct-selling platform while the other relies on cooperation with a third-party platform. A Stackelberg game model consisting of two competing substitute manufacturers and one e-commerce platform is constructed. The equilibrium prices, wholesale prices, and optimal profits of supply chain members are derived separately under three sales modes: reselling, consignment, and hybrid. Furthermore, single-factor sensitivity analyses are conducted with respect to potential market size, channel elasticity, and commission rate. The results show that the equilibrium decisions of Manufacturer B are significantly driven by key parameters. The reselling mode yields stable profits but restricts pricing power; the consignment mode is flexible yet sensitive to the commission rate; and the hybrid mode is more advantageous in an environment of intensified competition. An expansion of potential market size benefits the direct-selling manufacturer but squeezes the profits of the cooperative manufacturer. An improvement in channel elasticity can enhance the overall supply chain revenue through “volume compensating for price”. The commission rate exerts a nonlinear effect on both consignment and hybrid modes with an obvious threshold effect. This paper enriches the equilibrium theory of platform sales modes in competitive scenarios and provides decision-making references for manufacturers in channel strategy selection and for e-commerce platforms in commission mechanism design.
文章引用:周永成, 沐年国. 考虑制造商竞争的平台销售模式均衡决策研究[J]. 电子商务评论, 2026, 15(9): 845-854. https://doi.org/10.12677/ecl.2026.1591065

参考文献

[1] 曹序杰. 绿色供应链下考虑政府补贴的零售商销售模式选择研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 太原: 山西大学, 2023.
[2] 韩小花. 基于制造商竞争的闭环供应链回收渠道的决策分析[J]. 系统工程, 2010, 28(5): 36-41.
[3] 王文宾, 王智慧, 杨斯奇, 等. 制造商竞争下闭环供应链的押金返还制度研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2021, 29(6): 179-188.
[4] 赵道致, 原白云, 夏良杰, 等. 碳排放约束下考虑制造商竞争的供应链动态博弈[J]. 工业工程与管理, 2014, 19(1): 65-71.
[5] 吴志丹, 黄敏. 制造商竞争偏好的闭环供应链绩效分析[J]. 系统工程学报, 2020, 35(1): 73-87.
[6] 南江霞, 吴小勇, 张茂军. 区块链赋能的低碳市场制造商产量竞争与碳减排技术合作[J]. 中国管理科学, 2025, 33(6): 360-368.
[7] 周驰, 王艺馨, 于静. 批发, 代理还是混合?——与自营平台竞争的复合平台销售模式选择策略[J]. 山东大学学报(理学版), 2023, 58(1): 89-100.
[8] Zhang, R., Huang, Z.J., Liu, B. and Wang, J.L. (2024) Freshness-Keeping Efforts and Value-Added Service Choice in Fresh Food Supply Chain. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 190, Article ID: 110063.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2024.110063
[9] 董志刚, 徐庆, 马骋. 电子商务环境下双渠道供应链的制造商分销渠道选择[J]. 系统工程, 2015, 33(6): 26-33.
[10] 第 52 次中国互联网络发展状况统计报告[EB/OL]. 2023-08-28.
https://www.cnnic.cn/NMediaFile/2023/0908/MAIN1694151810549M3LV0UWOAV.pdf, 2024-04-16.
[11] Liu, B., Zhao, X.Y. and Gu, Q.Q. (2024) Pricing Strategy and Platform Competition with Partial Multi-Homing Agents: When the Aggregation Platform Exists in Ride-Sharing Market. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 184, Article ID: 103483.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tre.2024.103483
[12] 王美. 平台竞争和消费金融双视角下电商平台的商品质量问题研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 济南: 山东大学, 2023.
[13] Zhang, R., Liu, B. and Wang, W.L. (2012) Pricing Decisions in a Dual Channels System with Different Power Structures. Economic Modelling, 29, 523-533.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2011.08.024
[14] 杨天剑, 田建改. 不同渠道权力结构下供应链定价及绿色创新策略[J]. 软科学, 2019, 33(12): 127-132.
[15] 孙书省, 浦徐进, 韩广华. 考虑线下权力结构的制造商线上销售模式选择研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2019, 27(5): 119-129.