大学生时间管理对思政感知的影响:学业内卷行为与自我概念的链式中介作用
Time Management Disposition and Perception of Ideological and Political Education in College Students: Serial Mediation of Academic Involution and Self-Concept
DOI: 10.12677/ap.2026.169462, PDF,   
作者: 袁 月:云南民族大学教育学院,云南 昆明;关香丽:玉溪师范学院教师教育学院,云南 玉溪
关键词: 时间管理倾向思政感知学业内卷行为自我概念链式中介Time Management Disposition Perception of Ideological and Political Education Academic Involution Behavior Self-Concept Serial Mediation
摘要: 为探讨大学生时间管理倾向对思政感知的影响及其内在心理机制,本研究基于资源保存理论与自我决定理论,构建了一个链式中介模型,考察学业内卷行为与自我概念在二者之间的序列中介作用。采用方便抽样法,选取云南和陕西两省高校共489名大学生(Mage = 20.3岁;男生47.85%),使用青少年时间管理倾向量表、大学生学业内卷量表、Wallace自我概念量表及大学生课程思政感知量表进行问卷调查。结果表明:(1) 时间管理倾向对思政感知的直接效应不显著,提示其影响可能以间接路径为主;(2) 学业内卷行为与自我概念在时间管理倾向与思政感知之间构成显著的链式中介路径,间接效应值为0.029,Bootstrap 95%置信区间为[0.004, 0.061],效应占比15.10%;(3) 学业内卷行为单独的中介路径呈现显著的遮掩效应,间接效应值为−0.059,95%置信区间为[−0.121, −0.008]。上述发现揭示了时间管理倾向对思政感知影响的复杂作用机制:良好的时间管理能力通过抑制非理性内卷竞争、保护与提升自我概念,间接增强大学生的思政感知;而学业内卷行为在时间管理与思政感知之间的遮掩效应则提示,内卷行为的降低也可能通过削弱某些与竞争相关的参与动机而减弱思政感知。本研究首次将时间管理倾向与思政感知纳入同一心理机制模型,为高校通过协同开展时间管理训练、优化竞争生态与提升自我概念以增强思政教育实效性提供了实证依据。
Abstract: To investigate the impact of college students’ time management disposition on their perception of ideological and political education (IPE) and its underlying psychological mechanisms, this study, grounded in Conservation of Resources Theory and Self-Determination Theory, constructed a serial mediation model examining the sequential mediating roles of academic involution behavior and self-concept. A convenience sample of 489 college students (Mage = 20.3 years; 47.85% male) from universities in Yunnan and Shaanxi provinces completed the Adolescence Time Management Disposition Scale, the College Students’ Academic Involution Scale, the Wallace Self-Concept Scale, and the University Classroom Ideological and Political Education Integration Student Perception Scale. Results showed that: (1) The direct effect of time management disposition on IPE perception was not significant; (2) Academic involution behavior and self-concept formed a significant serial mediation pathway between time management disposition and IPE perception, with an indirect effect value of 0.029 (Bootstrap 95% CI [0.004, 0.061]), accounting for 15.10% of the total effect; and (3) The separate mediating pathway through academic involution behavior exhibited a significant suppression effect, with an indirect effect value of –0.059 (95% CI [−0.121, −0.008]). These findings reveal a complex mechanism with multiple pathways: effective time management indirectly enhances IPE perception by curbing irrational involution competition and protecting or promoting selfconcept; however, the reduction of involution behavior may also weaken superficially high perception, possibly due to reduced competition-related motivational engagement. Notably, this interpretation remains tentative and alternative explanations cannot be ruled out.
文章引用:袁月, 关香丽 (2026). 大学生时间管理对思政感知的影响:学业内卷行为与自我概念的链式中介作用. 心理学进展, 16(9), 409-419. https://doi.org/10.12677/ap.2026.169462

参考文献

[1] 陈必忠, 孙晓军(2022). 中国内地大学生时间管理倾向的时代变迁: 1999-2020. 心理科学进展, 30(9), 1968-1980.
[2] 丛中, 高文凤(1999). 自我接纳问卷的编制与信度效度检验. 中国行为医学科学, 8(1), 20-22.
[3] 郭婉然, 陶梦欣, 钟元赫, 李牧宸(2024). 大学生时间管理倾向对积极学业情绪的影响: 核心自我评价的中介作用. 理学进展, 14(3), 204-213.
[4] 韩会芳, 李义安, 韦嘉, 张进辅(2014). 大学生自尊与拖延: 时间管理倾向的中介效应. 西南师范大学学报(自然科学版), 39(10), 106-110.
[5] 黄希庭, 张志杰(2001). 青少年时间管理倾向量表的编制. 心理学报, 33(4), 338-343.
[6] 鲁平, 安妍, 李洋(2016). 大学生学业自我概念、学习动机与学习成绩的关系. 中国健康心理学杂志, 24(7), 1089-1092.
[7] 唐莹(2024). 大学生学业内卷行为量表的编制及影响因素研究. 硕士学位论文, 开封: 河南大学.
[8] 温忠麟, 叶宝娟(2014). 中介效应分析: 方法和模型发展. 心理科学进展, 22(5), 731-745.
[9] 杨晓燕(2002). Wallace自我概念量表在中学生中的应用. 硕士学位论文, 广州: 华南师范大学.
[10] 杨秀芹, 徐叶莹, 汪宇(2022). 艰难的突围: 大学生“内卷”的多重效应. 高教探索, (5), 118-123.
[11] 袁月, 马文婷, 关香丽(2026). 基于认知-情感-行为模型的大学生课程思政感知量表编制. 心理学进展, 2026, 16(9), 243-254.
[12] 苑津山, 幸泰杞(2021). “入局与破局”: 高校学生内卷参与者的行为逻辑与身心自救. 高教探索, (10), 123-128.
[13] 张傲杨(2022). 大学生内卷化困境生成机理透视——基于大学生学习动机发展的自我系统模型. 科教文汇, (24), 18-21.
[14] 周浩, 龙立荣(2004). 共同方法偏差的统计检验与控制方法. 心理科学进展, 12(6), 942-950.
[15] 朱松泽, 李楚欣(2023). 课程思政对大学生政治认同的影响机理研究——以首都高校大学生为研究对象. 成都理工大学学报(社会科学版), 31(4), 103-112.
[16] Hobfoll, S. E. (1989). Conservation of Resources: A New Attempt at Conceptualizing Stress. American Psychologist, 44, 513-524.
https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066x.44.3.513
[17] Lazarus, R. S., & Folkman, S. (1984). Stress, Appraisal, and Coping. Springer.
[18] Marsh, H. W., & Craven, R. G. (2006). Reciprocal Effects of Self-Concept and Performance from a Multidimensional Perspective: Beyond Seductive Pleasure and Unidimensional Perspectives. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 1, 133-163.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6916.2006.00010.x
[19] Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-Determination Theory and the Facilitation of Intrinsic Motivation, Social Development, and Well-Being. American Psychologist, 55, 68-78.
https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066x.55.1.68
[20] Shavelson, R. J., Hubner, J. J., & Stanton, G. C. (1976). Self-Concept: Validation of Construct Interpretations. Review of Educational Research, 46, 407-441.
https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543046003407
[21] Wallace, G. R., Spaner, S. D., & Filer, P. S. (1984). Factorial Comparison of the Wallace Self-Concept Scale between Special Education Teachers and Regular Classroom Teachers. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 44, 199-207.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164484442003
[22] Ye, X., Yang, W., Cheng, T., & Gao, H. (2025). The Relationship between Academic Delay of Gratification and Depressive Symptoms among College Students: Exploring the Roles of Academic Involution and Academic Resilience. Behavioral Sciences, 15, Article No. 1486.
https://doi.org/10.3390/bs15111486