慈善组织参与教育帮扶的实践路径研究——以Y基金会为例
Research on the Practical Path of Charitable Organizations in Educational Assistance—A Case Study of Foundation Y
摘要: 2026年,我国顺利完成脱贫攻坚同乡村振兴有效衔接五年过渡期帮扶任务,乡村帮扶工作全面转入常态化精准治理阶段。现阶段,巩固脱贫攻坚成果、坚决守住不发生规模性返贫底线,是乡村帮扶工作的核心任务。教育帮扶作为阻断农村贫困代际传递的治本之策,是常态化防返贫治理的关键支撑。当前,政府单一主导的传统帮扶模式存在供给单一、精准度不足等短板,难以适配基层差异化的帮扶需求。以基金会为代表的慈善组织组织凭借机制灵活、基层下沉度高的独特优势,有效弥补了公共帮扶体系的不足。本文以y基金会为案例,基于其“圆梦行动”教育帮扶实践项目,系统探析慈善组织参与乡村教育帮扶的实践路径,剖析现有模式的现存问题,探索优化路径,凝练可复制、可推广的长效帮扶范式,为完善常态化防返贫教育帮扶体系提供实践路径。
Abstract: In 2026, China successfully fulfilled the five-year transitional support task linking poverty alleviation with rural revitalization, and rural support work has fully entered a stage of regularized targeted governance. At this stage, consolidating the achievements of poverty alleviation and resolutely forestalling large-scale relapse into poverty constitute the core mandate of rural support initiatives. As a fundamental strategy to break the intergenerational transmission of rural poverty, educational support serves as a pivotal pillar for regularized anti-poverty governance. The conventional government-led support model is plagued by drawbacks including singular service supply and inadequate targeting accuracy, which fail to accommodate differentiated grassroots support demands. Charitable organizations represented by foundations boast unique strengths such as flexible operational mechanisms and extensive grassroots outreach, effectively compensating for deficiencies in the public support system. Taking Foundation Y as a case study and drawing on its educational support program “Dream Fulfillment Initiative”, this paper systematically explores the practical pathways for charitable organizations to engage in rural educational assistance, analyzes prominent flaws within the existing model, proposes optimization strategies, and develops replicable and scalable long-term support paradigms. It aims to provide practical references for refining the regularized educational support system against poverty relapse.
参考文献
|
[1]
|
刘世清. 目标悬浮、技术化治理与可持续性缺失——后扶贫时代教育精准扶贫如何继续前行? [J]. 南京社会科学, 2021(5): 146-153.
|
|
[2]
|
袁利平, 姜嘉伟. 教育扶贫的作用机制与路径创新[J]. 西北农林科技大学学报(社会科学版), 2020, 20(2): 35-43.
|
|
[3]
|
田波, 柳长兴. 人力资本视角下的“志智双扶”问题研究: 后扶贫时代的扶贫治理[J]. 重庆理工大学学报(社会科学), 2020, 34(2): 66-76.
|
|
[4]
|
薛美琴, 马超峰. 在地性整合: 社会组织立体式参与乡村振兴的路径[J]. 学习与实践, 2023(6): 131-140.
|
|
[5]
|
傅昌波, 游海霞, 魏璞祯. 关于完善新时代慈善事业制度环境的思考[J]. 中国行政管理, 2022(11): 152-154.
|
|
[6]
|
李怀瑞, 邓国胜. 社会力量参与乡村振兴的新内源发展路径研究——基于四个个案的比较[J]. 中国行政管理, 2021(5): 15-22.
|
|
[7]
|
姚松, 刘婷婷. 教育缓解相对贫困实践中的社会组织参与: 价值意蕴、现实困境及优化路径[J]. 教育与经济, 2022, 38(3): 35-40, 66.
|
|
[8]
|
吴晓蓉, 田晓苗. 后扶贫时代我国农村教育反贫困的价值理性回归——基于可行能力理论视角[J]. 国家教育行政学院学报, 2020(6): 29-34, 81.
|
|
[9]
|
林靖云, 刘亚敏. 我国教育治理中的社会参与: 困境与出路[J]. 现代教育管理, 2020(11): 44-50.
|
|
[10]
|
邓翔, 张鸿铭, 朱鹏润. 为有源头活水来——中国特色教育帮扶政策长期效果评估[J]. 教育与经济, 2025, 41(2): 53-62, 96.
|
|
[11]
|
龙永红, 汪霞. 社会组织参与教育治理的主体性及其建构[J]. 现代教育管理, 2018(8): 25-30.
|
|
[12]
|
蹇世琼, 贾伟, 蔡其勇. 中国式教育帮扶的“国家逻辑”阐释[J]. 教育学术月刊, 2026(2): 25-34.
|