人教2024七年级英语教材插图多模态协同效果研究——基于八个单元的个案分析
Research on the Multimodal Synergistic Effects of Illustrations in the 2024 PEP Edition of the Grade 7 English Textbook—A Case Study Based on Eight Units
摘要: 本研究对2024年人教版七年级英语教材中选取的八个单元进行个案分析,旨在探究教材插图与文本、版面布局、颜色等多模态资源的协同模式及功能效果。基于Kress & van Leeuwen的视觉语法理论、张德禄的多模态话语分析框架及模态协同理论,采用文本分析法,对样本中的39页含插图页面进行编码分析。在所选样本范围内,统计分析显示:插图以叙事再现为主(26幅,66.67%),概念再现为辅(12幅,30.77%);模态协同模式以互补–强化关系为主(28页,71.79%),互补–补充关系为辅(9页,23.08%);多模态协同在教材不同教学板块中发挥着语境创设(15页,38.46%)、语篇支架(7页,17.95%)、任务支架(7页,17.95%)等差异化教学功能。基于样本单元统计分析,研究对象教材插图并非简单装饰,而是与其他模态协同配合,发挥“1 + 1 > 2”的教学效果。本研究可为一线教师深入理解教材编写意图、高效使用教材多模态资源提供参考。
Abstract: This study conducts a case study of eight selected units from the 2024 PEP edition of the Grade 7 English textbook, analyzing the synergy types between illustrations and other modalities (e.g., text, page layout, color) and the synergy effects. Based on Kress & van Leeuwen’s visual grammar theory, Zhang Delu’s multimodal discourse analysis framework, and modality synergy theory, this study adopts text analysis method. A total of 39 textbook pages containing illustrations were coded and analyzed. Based on the chosen samples, research findings show that narrative representation dominates on textbook illustrations (26 pages, 66.67%), followed by conceptual representation (12 pages, 30.77%). The predominant synergy mode between illustrations and other modalities is complementary-reinforcement (28 pages, 71.79%), with complementary-supplementary as the secondary mode (9 pages, 23.08%). Multimodal synergy performs differentiated effects across different textbook teaching sections, including context creation (15 pages, 38.46%), discourse scaffolding (7 pages, 17.95%), and task direction (7 pages, 17.95%). To conclude, based on the analysis of the sample units, textbook illustrations are not mere decorations but work synergistically with other modalities to achieve a “1 + 1 > 2” effects. This study provides insights for front-line teachers to better understand textbook writers’ design intentions and to more effectively utilize multimodal resources in textbooks.
参考文献
|
[1]
|
中华人民共和国教育部. 义务教育英语课程标准(2022年版) [S]. 北京: 北京师范大学出版社, 2022.
|
|
[2]
|
Barthes, R. (1977) Rhetoric of the Image. Sage Publication Ltd.
|
|
[3]
|
Martinec, R. and Salway, A. (2005) A System for Image-text Relations in New (and Old) Media. Visual Communication, 4, 337-371. https://doi.org/10.1177/1470357205055928
|
|
[4]
|
Ahour, T. and Zafarani, P. (2016) A Critical Visual Analysis of Gender Representation of ELT Materials from a Multimodal Perspective. The Journal of Applied Linguistics, 9, 78-98.
|
|
[5]
|
陈小娟. 关于人教版高中英语教材2004版和2019版中性别呈现的研究——基于多模态批评话语分析视角[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 武汉: 华中师范大学, 2022.
|
|
[6]
|
Ajayi, L. (2012) How Teachers Deploy Multimodal Textbooks to Enhance English Language Learning. TESOL Journal, 6, 16-35.
|
|
[7]
|
Tahririan, M.H. and Sadri, E. (2013) Analysis of Images in Iranian High School EFL Course Books. Iranian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 16, 137-160.
|
|
[8]
|
中华人民共和国教育部. 普通高中英语课程标准(2017年版2020年修订) [S]. 北京: 人民教育出版社, 2020.
|
|
[9]
|
高玮洁. 初中英语教材插图效应的研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 南京: 南京师范大学, 2009.
|
|
[10]
|
张德禄, 王璐. 多模态话语模态的协同及在外语教学中的体现[J]. 外语学刊, 2010(2): 97-102.
|
|
[11]
|
Kress, G. and van Leeuwen, T. (1996) Reading Images: The Grammar of Visual Design. Routledge.
|
|
[12]
|
Halliday, M.A.K. (1978) Language as Social Semiotic: The Social Interpretation of Language and Meaning. Arnold.
|
|
[13]
|
张德禄. 多模态话语分析综合理论框架探索[J]. 中国外语, 2009, 6(1): 24-30.
|
|
[14]
|
张德禄, 等. 多模态话语分析理论与外语教学[M]. 北京: 高等教育出版社, 2015.
|
|
[15]
|
Salbego, N., Heberle, V. and Balen, M. (2015) A Visual Analysis of English Textbooks: Multimodal Scaffolded Learning. Calidoscópio, 13, 5-13. https://doi.org/10.4013/cld.2015.131.01
|