不同艾灸频率对寒湿型腰椎间盘突出症疗效的回顾性比较
Retrospective Comparison of Therapeutic Effects of Different Moxibustion Frequency on Cold Damp Type Lumbar Disc Herniation
摘要: 目的:比较不同艾灸频率对寒湿型腰椎间盘突出症的临床疗效,探讨艾灸治疗频率与疗效的关系,为优化艾灸治疗方案提供循证依据。方法:采用回顾性研究方法,收集2021年1月至2025年12月在珠海市中西医结合医院针灸科就诊的寒湿型腰椎间盘突出症患者病历资料。根据艾灸治疗频率分为高频组(实际接受艾灸 ≥ 3次/周)和低频组(0~2次/周),高频组42例、低频组28例,治疗周期均为1~4周。比较两组患者治疗前后疼痛视觉模拟评分(VAS)的变化。结果:共纳入70例患者,两组基线资料比较差异无统计学意义(P > 0.05)。治疗后两组VAS评分均较治疗前显著降低(P < 0.01)。两组治疗后VAS评分(高频组3.55 ± 0.83,低频组3.64 ± 0.56)差异无统计学意义(P > 0.05)。低频组1例患者出现局部皮肤轻微发红、瘙痒,余患者均未发生不良事件。结论:艾灸治疗寒湿型腰椎间盘突出症可有效缓解疼痛,且安全性良好;在本研究条件下,高频艾灸(实际接受艾灸 ≥ 3次/周)与低频艾灸(0~2次/周)的镇痛疗效相当。本研究反映的是艾灸暴露频率与疗效的关系,艾灸本身的有效性仍需前瞻性随机对照试验验证。
Abstract: Objective: To compare the clinical efficacy of different moxibustion frequencies in the treatment of lumbar disc herniation (LDH) of cold-dampness type, to explore the relationship between moxibustion treatment frequency and therapeutic efficacy, and to provide evidence for optimizing moxibustion treatment protocols. Methods: A retrospective study was conducted. Medical records of patients with cold-dampness type lumbar disc herniation treated in Department of Acupuncture and Moxibustion, Zhuhai Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine Hospital between January 2021 and December 2025 were collected. Patients were divided into a high-frequency group (actually receiving moxibustion ≥ 3 sessions/week) and a low-frequency group (0~2 sessions/week) according to the frequency of moxibustion treatment, with 42 cases in the high-frequency group and 28 cases in the low-frequency group. The treatment course lasted 1~4 weeks for both groups. Changes in the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) pain scores before and after treatment were compared between the two groups. Results: A total of 70 patients were included, and there were no statistically significant differences in baseline characteristics between the two groups (P > 0.05). After treatment, the VAS scores of both groups were significantly lower than those before treatment (P < 0.01). There was no statistically significant difference in post-treatment VAS scores between the two groups (high-frequency group: 3.55 ± 0.83; low-frequency group: 3.64 ± 0.56; P > 0.05). One patient in the low-frequency group developed mild local skin redness and itching, and no adverse events occurred in the remaining patients. Conclusion: Moxibustion can effectively relieve pain in patients with cold-dampness type lumbar disc herniation and has a good safety profile. Under the conditions of this study, the analgesic efficacy of high-frequency moxibustion (≥3 sessions/week) was comparable to that of low-frequency moxibustion (0~2 sessions/week). This study reflects the relationship between the frequency of moxibustion exposure and therapeutic efficacy; the effectiveness of moxibustion itself still needs to be verified by prospective randomized controlled trials.
文章引用:奚羽墨. 不同艾灸频率对寒湿型腰椎间盘突出症疗效的回顾性比较[J]. 中医学, 2026, 15(9): 333-338. https://doi.org/10.12677/tcm.2026.159517

参考文献

[1] 中华医学会骨科学分会脊柱外科学组, 中华医学会骨科学分会骨科康复学组. 腰椎间盘突出症诊疗指南[J]. 中华骨科杂志, 2020, 40(8): 477-487.
[2] 《中医病证诊断疗效标准∙膝周滑囊炎》项目组, 滕军燕. 中医病证诊断疗效标准∙膝周滑囊炎[J]. 中医正骨, 2025, 37(8): 1-3.
[3] 王尔亮. 汉学家文树德及其《黄帝内经∙灵枢》英译探析[J]. 中华中医药杂志, 2023, 38(8): 3863-3866.
[4] 卢静. 艾灸作用机制及安全性研究进展[J]. 中国民间疗法, 2019, 27(13): 105-107.
[5] 尹燕, 冷琴, 蔡定均. 近5年艾灸治疗腰椎间盘突出症临床研究进展[J]. 内蒙古中医药, 2022, 41(4): 139-142.
[6] 赵会, 朱艳. 基于TRPV1离子通道探讨艾灸镇痛机制[J]. 湖南中医药大学学报, 2022, 42(12): 2117-2121.
[7] 唐娅妮, 崔艺敏, 何轶帆, 等. 艾灸热、光、烟作用机制研究进展[J]. 中国中医药信息杂志, 2022, 29(11): 148-151.
[8] 胡琴琴, 刘萍, 李鸿菲. 拔罐联合艾灸对腰椎间盘突出症患者疼痛程度及腰椎功能的影响[J]. 医疗装备, 2024, 37(5): 137-139.
[9] 刘保延. 针灸学学科发展报告[M]. 北京: 人民卫生出版社, 2021: 347.
[10] 孟晓旭. 腰椎间盘突出症康复治疗中腰部核心肌力训练的临床评估[J]. 基因组学与应用生物学, 2019, 38(1): 308-312.
[11] 赵永宜, 周秦羽, 陈杨, 等. 艾灸的量效关系及作用机制的多学科研究进展[J]. 中医学, 2025, 14(7): 2994-2999.
[12] 侯思宁, 任路, 荆秦, 等. 基于线粒体能量代谢探讨艾灸治疗肾阳虚抑郁症的机制研究[J]. 时珍国医国药, 2025, 36(11): 2131-2134.
[13] 陈惠冰, 杨绮云, 郭小妹. 艾灸疗法的不良反应及安全性分析[J]. 河南中医, 2021, 41(6): 935-938.