技术乌托邦想象下智能翻译困境——过度适配批判与适度陌生化的跨文化交际价值
Techno-Utopian Imagination and the Dilemma of AI-Powered Translation—A Critique of Excessive Adaptation and the Cross-Cultural Communicative Value of Moderate Defamiliarization
摘要: 生成式智能翻译的普及催生了大众对跨语言沟通的技术乌托邦想象,译文流畅顺滑成为公众评判翻译质量的核心标尺,过度适配不断挤压翻译陌生化的生存空间,引发非文学文本跨文化阅读扁平化、同质化问题。现有研究多在文学翻译场景下讨论归化与陌生化,较少从社会科技想象的视角剖析智能翻译内部的价值矛盾。本文依托社会科技想象理论,界定翻译适配与翻译陌生化的概念边界,辨析适度陌生化与翻译讹误的本质区别,揭示“无限适配”幻象经由大众审美、算法反馈双向建构的生成机制,重估适度陌生化在认知提示、差异保存、反思激发层面的跨文化交际价值。研究认为,适配与陌生化并非二元对立,适配承担信息通达的工具价值,适度陌生化承载深度跨文化对话的认知价值。据此从观念澄清、实践策略与评价体系等维度提出二者动态平衡的实现路径,以期完善智能时代翻译价值评判体系。
Abstract: The popularity of generative AI-powered translation has given rise to public Techno-utopian Imagination of cross-linguistic communication. Fluency has become the dominant criterion for translation quality assessment. Excessive adaptation continuously squeezes the room for translational defamiliarization and leads to flattened and homogenized cross-cultural reading of non-literary texts. Existing studies mostly discuss domestication and defamiliarization within literary translation, yet few analyze value contradictions in AI translation from the perspective of Sociotechnical Imaginaries. Drawing on Sociotechnical Imagination Theory, this paper defines the conceptual boundaries of Translational Adaptation and Translational Defamiliarization, and distinguishes moderate defamiliarization from translational errors. It reveals how the fantasy of “unlimited adaptation” is co-constructed by public aesthetic preferences and algorithmic feedback, and re-evaluates the cross-cultural communicative values of moderate defamiliarization in cognitive cueing, diversity preservation and reflective stimulation. This study argues that adaptation and defamiliarization are not binary opposites: adaptation serves the instrumental value of information accessibility, while moderate defamiliarization realizes the cognitive value of in-depth cross-cultural dialogue. Pathways toward their dynamic balance are proposed from the dimensions of conceptual disenchantment, practical strategies and evaluation systems, so as to improve the translation value evaluation system for the AI-driven era.
文章引用:曹谜. 技术乌托邦想象下智能翻译困境——过度适配批判与适度陌生化的跨文化交际价值[J]. 现代语言学, 2026, 14(10): 11-18. https://doi.org/10.12677/ml.2026.1410963

参考文献

[1] 赵苓岑. 智能时代翻译的伦理危机与反思[J]. 外国语, 2025, 48(6): 115-121.
[2] Venuti, L. (1995) The Translator’s Invisibility: A History of Translation. Routledge.
[3] 卢加伟. “知识扁平化”: 知识翻译学视域下牡丹文化意象MT + PE困境与出路[J]. 当代外语研究, 2026(2): 159-171.
[4] 王少爽, 陈媛媛. 技术社会学视域下生成式人工智能对翻译行业发展的影响探析[J]. 上海翻译, 2025(4): 59-65.
[5] Jasanoff, S. (2015) Dreamscapes of Modernity: Sociotechnical Imaginaries and the Fabrication of Power. The University of Chicago Press.
https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226276663.001.0001
[6] 尚智丛, 冯础. “Sociotechnical Imaginary”的含义辨析及中译讨论[J]. 科学与社会, 2022, 12(1): 23-36.
[7] 杨磊. 何以“陌生化”: “现代俄罗斯”的再启蒙[J]. 首都师范大学学报(社会科学版), 2017(6): 119-126.
[8] 王卓. 陌生化理论关照下葛浩文的翻译思想探究——以译作《生死疲劳》为例[J]. 昭通学院学报, 2015, 37(2): 38-41.
[9] 郑敏宇. 重拾依瑞∙列维的翻译思想[J]. 中国翻译, 2013, 34(6): 13-17.
[10] 陈琳. 论陌生化翻译[J]. 中国翻译, 2010, 31(1): 13-20.
[11] 袁筱一. 人工智能与文学翻译批评原则的再思考[J]. 法语国家与地区研究, 2026(1): 1-13.
[12] 杨文地, 范梓锐. 科技语篇机器翻译的译后编辑例析[J]. 上海翻译, 2021(6): 54-59.
[13] 王晔. 陌生化视阈下政治文献术语翻译中的显异研究——基于近年来政府工作报告俄译本的实证分析[J]. 天津外国语大学学报, 2017, 24(3): 7-12, 80.
[14] 王贇, 张政. 数字化时代机器翻译的风险审视及控制研究[J]. 中国翻译, 2022, 43(2): 109-115.
[15] 刘丽婷. 《红高粱家族》葛译本中的陌生化再现研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 西安: 西安外国语大学, 2024.
[16] 陈磊, 李泽世, 王鹏晓, 瞿灼芮, 曹晨宇, 刘红江. 学术论文标题翻译: 常用机器翻译质量评估指标的局限性与多维量化评估标准的构建[J]. 科技传播, 2023, 15(16): 43-46, 50.
[17] 张文煜, 赵璧. 生成式人工智能开创机器翻译的新纪元了吗?——一项质量对比研究及对翻译教育的思考[J]. 北京第二外国语学院学报, 2024, 46(1): 83-98.
[18] 文雯. “巴别塔”的幻象: 生成式人工智能如何重塑本土和全球科研系统之间的张力[J]. 比较教育研究, 2026, 46(2): 3-16.
[19] 王均松, 张政. 人机协同翻译时代的译者提示素养: 框架构建与提升路径[J]. 中国外语, 2026, 23(3): 89-95.
[20] 陈子建, 王斯日古楞, 斯琴图. 大模型微调的多领域机器翻译方法综述[J]. 计算机科学与探索, 2025, 19(4): 916-928.