基于跨参考多机制证据轨迹网络的脑电专注状态识别
EEG-Based Attention State Recognition Using a Cross-Reference Multi-Mechanism Evidence Trajectory Network
DOI: 10.12677/hjbm.2026.165090, PDF,   
作者: 于龙龙*:山东交通学院轨道交通学院,山东 济南;山东中科先进技术有限公司,山东 济南;刘文江:山东交通学院轨道交通学院,山东 济南;孙家政, 张宁玲#:山东中科先进技术有限公司,山东 济南
关键词: 脑电信号;专注状态识别;跨参考表征;因果时间卷积;Electroencephalography; Attention State Recognition; Cross-Reference Representation; Causal Temporal Convolution
摘要: 针对短时窗脑电专注状态识别易受频谱估计波动、参考方式差异及重叠窗口信息泄露的问题,本文提出跨参考多机制证据轨迹网络(Cross-Reference Multi-Mechanism Evidence Trajectory Network, CRMET-Net)。该方法分别在原始参考视图与公共平均参考(common average reference, CAR)视图中分别提取相位–幅值耦合(phase-amplitude coupling, PAC)和复相位锁定特征,构建跨参考互补表征,并结合增益不变多锥窗稀疏复图轨迹(Gain-Invariant Multitaper Complex Graph Trajectory, GIMCGT),同时表征短窗频谱特性与脑区连接关系。训练阶段通过内层交叉验证生成各基分类器的折外预测,并将不同基分类器之间的一致、互补与冲突信息编码为证据序列,利用因果时间卷积网络建模其动态变化。在MEMA放松–专注二分类任务中,CRMET-Net在跨Trial五折交叉验证下取得90.06%的准确率、90.06%的平衡准确率和90.04%的宏平均F1;在留一被试交叉验证(leave-one-subject-out cross-validation, LOSO)下,三项指标分别达到71.46%、71.35%和71.37%。实验结果表明,CRMET-Net具有较好的跨Trial识别性能,并在完全未见被试上表现出一定的迁移潜力。
Abstract: To address the challenges associated with identifying focused states from short-window EEG—specifically susceptibility to spectral estimation fluctuations, variations in referencing schemes, and information leakage across overlapping windows—this paper proposes the Cross-Reference Multi-Mechanism Evidence Trajectory Network (CRMET-Net). This method extracts phase-amplitude coupling (PAC) and complex phase-locking features from both raw reference and common average reference (CAR) views to construct complementary cross-reference representations. It integrates these with Gain-Invariant Multitaper Complex Graph Trajectory (GIMCGT) features to simultaneously characterize short-window spectral properties and connectivity relationships between brain regions. During training, inner-loop cross-validation generates out-of-fold predictions for base classifiers; information regarding consensus, complementarity, and conflict among these classifiers is encoded into evidence sequences, the dynamics of which are modeled using a causal temporal convolutional network. In the MEMA relaxation-versus-focus binary classification task, CRMET-Net achieved an accuracy of 90.06%, a balanced accuracy of 90.06%, and a macro-averaged F1-score of 90.04% under cross-trial five-fold cross-validation; under leave-one-subject-out cross-validation (LOSO), these three metrics reached 71.46%, 71.35%, and 71.37%, respectively. Experimental results demonstrate that CRMET-Net exhibits robust cross-trial recognition performance and shows potential for transferability to entirely unseen subjects.
文章引用:于龙龙, 刘文江, 孙家政, 张宁玲. 基于跨参考多机制证据轨迹网络的脑电专注状态识别[J]. 生物医学, 2026, 16(5): 875-889. https://doi.org/10.12677/hjbm.2026.165090

参考文献

[1] Liu, H., Zhang, Y.Z., Liu, G.J., Du, X.X., Wang, H.C. and Zhang, D.L. (2025) A Multi-Label EEG Dataset for Mental Attention State Classification in Online Learning. ICASSP 2025—2025 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP), Hyderabad, 6-11 April 2025, 1-5.
https://doi.org/10.1109/icassp49660.2025.10889126
[2] Chen, X., Bao, X.T., Jitian, K., Li, R.H., Zhu, L. and Kong, W.Z. (2025) Hybrid EEG Feature Learning Method for Cross-Session Human Mental Attention State Classification. Brain Sciences, 15, Article 805.
https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci15080805
[3] Tang, M., Lan, H., Ju, X.Y., Li, M. and Hu, D.W. (2026) Physiologically Guided Cross-Modal Fusion for Robust Vigilance Estimation. IEEE Sensors Journal, 26, 14715-14725.
https://doi.org/10.1109/jsen.2025.3606532
[4] Postepski, F., Wojcik, G.M., Wrobel, K., Kawiak, A., Zemla, K. and Sedek, G. (2025) Recurrent and Convolutional Neural Networks in Classification of EEG Signal for Guided Imagery and Mental Workload Detection. Scientific Reports, 15, Article No. 10521.
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-92378-x
[5] Lawhern, V.J., Solon, A.J., Waytowich, N.R., Gordon, S.M., Hung, C.P. and Lance, B.J. (2018) EEGNet: A Compact Convolutional Neural Network for EEG-Based Brain-Computer Interfaces. Journal of Neural Engineering, 15, Article ID: 056013.
https://doi.org/10.1088/1741-2552/aace8c
[6] Nouri, Z., Charmin, A., Kalbkhani, H. and Barghandan, S. (2026) Multivariate Synchrosqueezing Transform and Time-Frequency Attention for Mental Workload Classification from EEG Signals. Scientific Reports, 16, Article No. 4948.
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-34783-w
[7] Jiang, W.B., Zhao, L. and Lu, B.L. (2024) Large Brain Model for Learning Generic Representations with Tremendous EEG Data in BCI. International Conference on Learning Representations 2024, Vienna, 7-11 May 2024, 16405-16426.
[8] Wang, G., Liu, W., He, Y., Xu, C., Ma, L. and Li, H. (2024) EEGPT: Pretrained Transformer for Universal and Reliable Representation of EEG Signals. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 37, Vancouver, 10-15 December 2024, 39249-39280.
https://doi.org/10.52202/079017-1239
[9] Wang, J., Zhao, S., Luo, Z., et al. (2025) CBraMod: A Criss-Cross Brain Foundation Model for EEG Decoding. International Conference on Learning Representations 2025, Singapore, 24-26 April 2025, 75310-75346.
[10] Schirrmeister, R.T., Springenberg, J.T., Fiederer, L.D.J., Glasstetter, M., Eggensperger, K., Tangermann, M., et al. (2017) Deep Learning with Convolutional Neural Networks for EEG Decoding and Visualization. Human Brain Mapping, 38, 5391-5420.
https://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.23730
[11] Lachaux, J., Rodriguez, E., Martinerie, J. and Varela, F.J. (1999) Measuring Phase Synchrony in Brain Signals. Human Brain Mapping, 8, 194-208.
https://doi.org/10.1002/(sici)1097-0193(1999)8:4<194::aid-hbm4>3.0.co;2-c
[12] Chacko, R.V., Kim, B., Jung, S.W., Daitch, A.L., Roland, J.L., Metcalf, N.V., et al. (2018) Distinct Phase-Amplitude Couplings Distinguish Cognitive Processes in Human Attention. NeuroImage, 175, 111-121.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.03.003
[13] Aru, J., Aru, J., Priesemann, V., Wibral, M., Lana, L., Pipa, G., et al. (2015) Untangling Cross-Frequency Coupling in Neuroscience. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 31, 51-61.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conb.2014.08.002
[14] Szczepanski, S.M., Crone, N.E., Kuperman, R.A., Auguste, K.I., Parvizi, J. and Knight, R.T. (2014) Dynamic Changes in Phase-Amplitude Coupling Facilitate Spatial Attention Control in Fronto-Parietal Cortex. PLOS Biology, 12, e1001936.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1001936
[15] Qiao, S.L., Xia, X.M., Chen, J. and Valsecchi, M. (2025) Attentional Tracking Reduces Cortical Alpha Oscillations. Scientific Reports, 15, Article No. 34067.
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-14585-w
[16] Simeone, D., Polo, E.M., Barbieri, R. and Paglialonga, A. (2025) Dynamic Assessment of Listening Effort by EEG Alpha Oscillations during an Adaptive Speech-in-Noise Test. Scientific Reports, 15, Article No. 34421.
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-17451-x
[17] Yao, D., Qin, Y., Hu, S., Dong, L., Bringas Vega, M.L. and Valdés Sosa, P.A. (2019) Which Reference Should We Use for EEG and ERP Practice? Brain Topography, 32, 530-549.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10548-019-00707-x
[18] Brookshire, G., Kasper, J., Blauch, N.M., Wu, Y.C., Glatt, R., Merrill, D.A., et al. (2024) Data Leakage in Deep Learning Studies of Translational EEG. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 18, Article 1373515.
https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2024.1373515
[19] Kinahan, S., Saidi, P., Daliri, A., Liss, J. and Berisha, V. (2024) Achieving Reproducibility in EEG-Based Machine Learning. The 2024 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency, Rio de Janeiro, 3-6 June 2024, 1464-1474.
https://doi.org/10.1145/3630106.3658983
[20] Rosenblatt, M., Tejavibulya, L., Jiang, R., Noble, S. and Scheinost, D. (2024) Data Leakage Inflates Prediction Performance in Connectome-Based Machine Learning Models. Nature Communications, 15, Article No. 1829.
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-024-46150-w
[21] Barachant, A., Bonnet, S., Congedo, M. and Jutten, C. (2012) Multiclass Brain-Computer Interface Classification by Riemannian Geometry. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, 59, 920-928.
https://doi.org/10.1109/tbme.2011.2172210
[22] He, H. and Wu, D. (2020) Transfer Learning for Brain-Computer Interfaces: A Euclidean Space Data Alignment Approach. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, 67, 399-410.
https://doi.org/10.1109/tbme.2019.2913914
[23] Junqueira, B., Aristimunha, B., Chevallier, S. and de Camargo, R.Y. (2024) A Systematic Evaluation of Euclidean Alignment with Deep Learning for EEG Decoding. Journal of Neural Engineering, 21, Article ID: 036038.
https://doi.org/10.1088/1741-2552/ad4f18
[24] Liang, S., Li, L., Zu, W., Feng, W. and Hang, W. (2024) Adaptive Deep Feature Representation Learning for Cross-Subject EEG Decoding. BMC Bioinformatics, 25, Article No. 393.
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12859-024-06024-w
[25] Zhi, H.Y., Yu, T.Y., Gu, Z.H., Lin, Z.B., Che, L., Li, Y.Q., et al. (2025) Supervised Contrastive Learning-Based Domain Generalization Network for Cross-Subject Motor Decoding. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, 72, 401-412.
https://doi.org/10.1109/tbme.2024.3432934
[26] Liang, Z., Zheng, Z., Chen, W., Ma, X., Pei, Z. and Sun, X. (2025) Domain Generalization for Zero-Calibration Brain-Computer Interfaces with Knowledge Distillation-Based Phase Invariant Feature Extraction. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 148, Article ID: 110340.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engappai.2025.110340
[27] Kim, J., Nam, H., Won, D. and Im, C. (2025) Domain-Generalized Deep Learning for Improved Subject-Independent Emotion Recognition Based on Electroencephalography. Experimental Neurobiology, 34, 119-130.
https://doi.org/10.5607/en25011
[28] Delorme, A. and Makeig, S. (2004) EEGLAB: An Open Source Toolbox for Analysis of Single-Trial EEG Dynamics Including Independent Component Analysis. Journal of Neuroscience Methods, 134, 9-21.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneumeth.2003.10.009
[29] Varoquaux, G. (2018) Cross-Validation Failure: Small Sample Sizes Lead to Large Error Bars. NeuroImage, 180, 68-77.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.06.061
[30] Canolty, R.T., Edwards, E., Dalal, S.S., Soltani, M., Nagarajan, S.S., Kirsch, H.E., et al. (2006) High Gamma Power Is Phase-Locked to Theta Oscillations in Human Neocortex. Science, 313, 1626-1628.
https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1128115
[31] Thomson, D.J. (1982) Spectrum Estimation and Harmonic Analysis. Proceedings of the IEEE, 70, 1055-1096.
https://doi.org/10.1109/proc.1982.12433
[32] Bai, S., Kolter, J.Z. and Koltun, V. (2018) An Empirical Evaluation of Generic Convolutional and Recurrent Networks for Sequence Modeling. arXiv: 1803.01271.
[33] Perez, E., Strub, F., De Vries, H., Dumoulin, V. and Courville, A. (2018) Film: Visual Reasoning with a General Conditioning Layer. Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 32, 3942-3951.
https://doi.org/10.1609/aaai.v32i1.11671
[34] Ganin, Y., Ustinova, E., Ajakan, H., et al. (2016) Domain-Adversarial Training of Neural Networks. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 17, 2096-2030.