数字技术赋能大中小思政教育资源一体化研究
Research on the Integration of Ideological and Political Education Resources for Primary, Secondary, and Higher Education through Digital Technology
DOI: 10.12677/ass.2026.159792, PDF,   
作者: 万美玲:江汉大学马克思主义学院,湖北 武汉
关键词: 数字技术;资源一体化;内在逻辑;价值探析;Digital Technology; Resource Integration; Internal Logic; Value Analysis
摘要: 数字技术为大中小学思政教育资源一体化提供了全新的动力机制与实现路径。本文从数据驱动、平台协同、智能适配与沉浸体验四个维度,系统阐释了数字技术赋能思政教育资源一体化的内在逻辑。数据驱动实现了资源建设从经验判断向精准匹配的转变;平台协同打破了传统资源孤岛,构建了生态共建机制;智能适配推动供给模式从统一服务走向个性化服务;沉浸体验借助VR/AR等技术,将抽象说教转化为具身体验,促进价值内化。在此基础上,本文进一步探析了数字技术赋能的三大价值:精准识别资源需求,推动学段衔接科学化;精准供给教学内容,增强情感共鸣与价值认同;精准整合教育资源,构建协同育人生态,同时,本文也审慎分析了数字赋能过程中潜在的数据伦理、算法偏见与技术依赖等风险。数字技术的深度应用,有望推动思政教育从“粗放式”走向“精细化”,实现大中小学思政教育的有机衔接与高质量发展。
Abstract: Digital technology provides a new driving mechanism and implementation pathway for the integrated development of ideological and political education resources across primary, secondary, and higher education institutions. This paper systematically explains the internal logic behind digital technology’s empowerment of such integration through four dimensions: data-driven approaches, platform collaboration, intelligent adaptation, and immersive experiences. Data-driven methods enable a shift from experience-based judgment to precise resource matching; platform collaboration breaks down traditional silos of resources and establishes a co-creation ecosystem; intelligent adaptation transforms supply models from one-size-fits-all services to personalized ones; and immersive experiences leverage VR/AR technologies to convert abstract instruction into embodied learning, promoting value internalization. Building on this foundation, the paper further explores three key values enabled by digital technology: accurately identifying resource needs to promote scientific transitions between educational stages; precisely delivering teaching content to enhance emotional resonance and value identification; and effectively integrating educational resources to build a collaborative ecosystem. At the same time, the paper cautiously analyzes potential risks in the process of digital empowerment, including data ethics, algorithmic bias, and technological dependency. The deep application of digital technology holds promise for transforming ideological and political education from a “coarse” to a “refined” approach, enabling seamless and high-quality integration across all levels of education.
文章引用:万美玲. 数字技术赋能大中小思政教育资源一体化研究[J]. 社会科学前沿, 2026, 15(9): 633-639. https://doi.org/10.12677/ass.2026.159792

参考文献

[1] 林于良. 数智时代思政教育一体化建设的理性审思与路径创新[J]. 江苏高教, 2025(12): 91-96.
[2] 商晓辉, 赵子强. 数字技术赋能当代思政课程的多维逻辑与实现路径[J]. 高等农业教育, 2024(1): 121-127.
[3] 游运珍. 数字技术赋能中华民族共同体意识教育一体化探析[J]. 呼伦贝尔学院学报, 2025, 33(6): 13-18.
[4] 祝智庭, 胡姣. 教育数字化转型的本质探析与研究展望[J]. 中国电化教育, 2022(4): 1-8+25.
[5] 李政涛. 表演: 解读教育活动的新视角[M]. 北京: 教育科学出版社, 2006: 102.
[6] 教育部等十部门关于印发《全面推进“大思政课”建设的工作方案》的通知[J]. 中华人民共和国教育部公报, 2022(10): 8-14.
[7] 李振, 周东岱. 教育知识图谱的概念模型与构建方法研究[J]. 电化教育研究, 2019, 40(8): 78-86+113.
[8] 叶浩生. 具身认知: 认知心理学的新取向[J]. 心理科学进展, 2010, 18(5): 705-710.
[9] 张法琨. 皮亚杰的教育科学发展观[J]. 北京师范大学学报, 1983(6): 83-87+93.
[10] 班杜拉. 思想和行动的社会基础——社会认知论[M]. 林颖, 等, 译. 上海: 华东师范大学出版社, 2001.
[11] 李辽宁, 吴璐曦. 思想政治教育中教育者与受教育者情感共鸣的价值意蕴、生成机理与促进策略[J]. 思想政治教育研究, 2025, 41(4): 37-44.
[12] 祝智庭, 林梓柔, 魏非, 闫寒冰. 教师发展数字化转型: 平台化、生态化、实践化[J]. 中国电化教育, 2023(1): 8-15.