城市老年人“老有所为”社会支持机制的生成逻辑
The Generative Logic of Social Support Mechanism for Urban Elderly People’s “Productive Engagement”
摘要: 在积极应对人口老龄化国家战略背景下,推动城市低龄老年人“老有所为”成为老龄治理的重要议题。现有研究多从影响因素层面展开分析,对社会支持机制的生成过程关注不足。基于积极老龄化理论、社会支持理论、社会交换理论与结构化理论,本文构建“主体需求–制度回应–社会网络–互动调适”四维分析框架,探讨城市低龄老年人“老有所为”社会支持机制的生成逻辑。研究发现,该机制源于主体需求驱动,经由制度回应实现结构化建构,通过社会网络完成资源嵌入与实践转化,并在持续互动调适中实现动态优化与演进,四者共同构成一个动态生成与循环再生产的支持体系。同时,该机制在现实运行中仍面临需求公共化不足、制度整合碎片化、日常情境嵌入不充分以及反馈机制不畅等结构性困境。研究从生成逻辑视角丰富了相关研究的解释路径,并为城市低龄老年人社会参与支持实践提供参考。
Abstract: Against the backdrop of the national strategy for active aging, promoting “productive engagement” among urban young-old adults has become a critical issue in aging governance. Existing studies mainly focus on influencing factors, paying insufficient attention to the generative process of social support mechanisms. Drawing on active aging theory, social support theory, social exchange theory, and structuration theory, this paper constructs a four-dimensional analytical framework of “subject needs—institutional response—social network—interactive adjustment” to explore the generative logic of the social support mechanism for urban young-old adults’ productive engagement. The study finds that this mechanism originates from subject needs, undergoes structural construction through institutional response, achieves resource embedding and practical transformation via social networks, and realizes dynamic optimization and evolution through continuous interactive adjustment. These four dimensions together constitute a dynamically generated and circularly reproduced support system. Meanwhile, in practical operation, the mechanism still faces structural dilemmas such as insufficient publicization of demands, fragmented institutional integration, inadequate embedding in daily contexts, and poor feedback mechanisms. This research enriches the explanatory pathways of relevant studies from the perspective of generative logic and provides a reference for supporting urban elderly people’s social participation.
参考文献
|
[1]
|
程杰, 李冉. 中国退休人口劳动参与率为何如此之低——兼论中老年人力资源开发的挑战与方向[J]. 北京师范大学学报(社会科学版), 2022(2): 143-155.
|
|
[2]
|
宋月萍, 张光赢, 彭可余. 中国低龄老年人劳动参与的现状、特征及趋势[J]. 人口研究, 2024, 48(2): 75-89.
|
|
[3]
|
何继新, 高文静. 低龄老年人参与城市基层治理共同体建设: 理论视角、现实困厄与实践路径[J]. 学习与实践, 2025(3): 105-116.
|
|
[4]
|
何继新, 高文静. 外部约束与内生动力: 低龄老年人参与基层治理共同体建设的阻碍问题研究[J]. 社会工作与管理, 2025, 25(5): 65-73.
|
|
[5]
|
杜鹏, 王菲. “老有所为”在中国的发展: 政策变迁和框架构建[J]. 人口与发展, 2011, 17(6): 34-38.
|
|
[6]
|
王欢明, 钟峥云. 社会支持视角下农村老年人互助养老行为及影响因素研究[J]. 广西师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2024, 60(2): 59-74.
|
|
[7]
|
孙启泮. 社会交换理论视角下的城市社区老年人互助养老意愿影响因素研究[J]. 青岛农业大学学报(社会科学版), 2024, 36(3): 42-50, 62.
|
|
[8]
|
World Health Organization (2002) Active Ageing: A Policy Framework. World Health Organization.
|
|
[9]
|
彼得. 社会生活中的交换与权力[M]. 李国武, 译. 北京: 商务印书馆, 2008.
|
|
[10]
|
安东尼∙吉登斯. 社会的构成: 结构化理论大纲[M]. 北京: 三联书店, 1998.
|
|
[11]
|
鲁晓明. 积极老龄化视角下之就业老年人权益保障[J]. 法学论坛, 2021, 36(4): 120-128.
|
|
[12]
|
谢立黎, 汪斌. 积极老龄化视野下中国老年人社会参与模式及影响因素[J]. 人口研究, 2019, 43(3): 17-30.
|