新质生产力对马克思主义生态观的创新与发展
The Innovation and Development of New Quality Productive Forces on Marxist Ecological View
摘要: 本文立足马克思关于人与自然、自然力与生产力关系的基本立场,从理论溯源、内涵阐释与发展创新三方面展开论述,系统揭示新质生产力的绿色本质,并从生态价值观、科技观和历史观三个维度阐释其对马克思主义生态观的时代化创新。研究认为,新质生产力将生态环境从“外部约束”转化为“内在规定”,实现了生态观的时代化发展。通过与国际上“生态现代化”等理论的比较,以及对中国新能源汽车产业的具体案例分析,本文论证了这一绿色生产力范式深植于唯物史观,回应了工业文明下的生态悖论,顺应了从工业文明向可持续文明的演进趋势,以经济效益与生态效益的统一、人的全面发展与生态完善的协同为价值旨归,构建“人与自然生命共同体”。实践层面,需以生态文明理念为先导,健全绿色制度与治理机制,强化绿色科技创新驱动,为高质量发展和美丽中国建设提供理论依据与实践指引。
Abstract: Grounded in Marx’s fundamental positions on the relationship between humanity and nature, and between natural forces and productive forces, this paper systematically reveals the green essence of new quality productive forces through theoretical tracing, connotative interpretation, and developmental innovation. It further elucidates its contemporary Sinicization of Marxist ecology from three dimensions: ecological values, ecological views on science and technology, and ecological historical perspectives. The study argues that new quality productive forces transform the ecological environment from an “external constraint” into an “internal imperative”, thereby achieving a contemporary development of ecological thought. By comparing with international theories such as “ecological modernization” and conducting a specific case analysis of China’s new energy vehicle industry, this paper demonstrates that green productive forces paradigm is deeply rooted in historical materialism, responds to the ecological paradox of industrial civilization, and conforms to the evolutionary trend from industrial civilization to sustainable civilization. It takes the unity of economic and ecological benefits, as well as the synergy between comprehensive human development and ecological improvement, as its value orientation, constructing a “community of life between humanity and nature”. At the practical level, it is necessary to take the concept of ecological civilization as a guide, improve green institutions and governance mechanisms, and strengthen green scientific and technological innovation, so as to provide theoretical foundations and practical guidance for high-quality development and the construction of a Beautiful China.
参考文献
|
[1]
|
马克思. 1844年经济学哲学手稿[M]. 中共中央马克思恩格斯列宁斯大林著作编译局, 编译. 北京: 人民出版社, 2018.
|
|
[2]
|
恩格斯. 自然辩证法[M]. 中共中央马克思恩格斯列宁斯大林著作编译局, 编译. 北京: 人民出版社, 2018.
|
|
[3]
|
席景. 福斯特对马克思“新陈代谢断裂”理论的解读及其启示[J]. 哲学进展, 2022, 11(4): 806-812.
|
|
[4]
|
佟明燕. 马克思生产力理论的生态向度及其当代启示[J]. 贵州师范学院学报, 2025, 41(2): 8-12.
|
|
[5]
|
马克思. 资本论: 第1卷[M]. 北京: 人民出版社, 2004.
|
|
[6]
|
马克思. 哥达纲领批判[M]//马克思, 恩格斯. 马克思恩格斯选集: 第3卷. 北京: 人民出版社, 2012: 357.
|
|
[7]
|
韩升, 王雪钰. 新质生产力发展的生态哲学意涵[N]. 中国社会科学报, 2024-03-27(2861).
|
|
[8]
|
张志朋, 李丽利. 新质生产力赋能人与自然和谐共生的现代化探赜——基于生产力实体性要素视角[J]. 北京林业大学学报(社会科学版), 2026, 25(3): 24-30.
|
|
[9]
|
任福兵, 孔德进. 新质生产力生态向度的核心意蕴与实践进路[J]. 上海理工大学学报(社会科学版), 2025, 47(6): 581-590.
|
|
[10]
|
沈广明. 马克思主义生产力理论的生态叙事[J]. 马克思主义研究, 2025(11): 67-74.
|
|
[11]
|
江沙. “新质生产力本身就是绿色生产力”的三维探析[J]. 河北农业大学学报(社会科学版), 2025, 27(2): 23-33.
|